Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Islam’s Marriage with Neoliberalism: State Transformation in Turkey, Yıldız Atasoy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price:
$30.00+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Historical Materialism

Abstract Yıldız Atasoy’s recent survey of state transformation in Turkey reiterates some of the most typical shortcomings of Marxian approaches to the Ottoman/Turkish modernisation. This involves an ahistorical conception of capitalism reduced to commercial expansion and a structuralist method that transhistoricises the historical differentiation of the economic from the political. Combined together in Atasoy’s book, capitalism no longer exists in the shape of specific social relations and particular juridical/political forms, but rather it precedes and determines them. Consequently, social struggles over production and reproduction are separated from and no longer implicated within struggles over the redefinition of citizenship, secularism and democracy. An implicit economic determinism eventually prevails, reproducing functionalist modes of argumentation. Based on a theoretical and historical critique of Atasoy’s argument, this review seeks to provide new insights into Ottoman/Turkish modernity from a Political Marxist perspective.

1. Adanır Fikret Chirot Daniel "‘Tradition and Rural Change in Southeastern Europe During Ottoman Rule’" The Origins of Backwardness in Eastern Europe 1989 Berkeley University of California Press
2. Ahmad Feroz Ahmad Feroz "‘Kemalizmin Ekonomi Politigi’" Ittihatciliktan Kemalizme 2009 Istanbul Kaynak Yayinlari
3. Alper Emre , Öniş Ziya "‘Financial Globalization, the Democratic Deficit and Recurrent Crises in Emerging Markets: The Turkish Experience in the Aftermath of Capital Account Liberalization’" Emerging Markets, Finance and Trade 2003 Vol 39 3 5 26
4. Amsden Alice Evans Peter B. , Rueschemeyer Dietrich , Skocpol Theda "‘The State and Taiwan’s Economic Development’" Bringing The State Back In 1985 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
5. Amsden Alice The Rise of the Rest: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies 2001 Oxford Oxford University Press
6. Anderson Perry Lineages of the Absolutist State 1974 London New Left Books
7. Atasoy Yıldız Turkey, Islamists and Democracy: Transition and Globalization in a Muslim State 2005 London I.B. Tauris
8. Atasoy Yıldız Islam’s Marriage with Neoliberalism: State Transformation in Turkey 2009 Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230246669
9. Aydın Zülküf The Political Economy of Turkey 2005 London Pluto Press
10. Barkan Ömer Lütfü "‘Les Problèmes Fonciers dans l’Empire Ottoman au temps de sa fondation’" Annales d’Histoire Sociale 1939 Vol 1 3 233 237
11. Barnes John Robert An Introduction to Religious Foundations in the Ottoman Empire 1986 Leiden Brill
12. Berberoğlu Berch Turkey in Crisis: From State Capitalism to Neo-colonialism 1982 London Zed Books
13. Berktay Halil "‘The Feudalism Debate: The Turkish End – Is “Tax-vs.-Rent” Necessarily the Product and Sign of a Modal Difference?’" The Journal of Peasant Studies 1987 Vol 14 3 291 333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066158708438332
14. Blackbourn David , Eley Geoff The Peculiarities of German History: Bourgeois Society and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Germany 1984 Oxford Oxford University Press http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198730583.001.0001
15. Boratav Korkut Turkiye Iktisat Tarihi 1908–2002 2003 Ankara Imge Yayinevi
16. Brenner Robert "‘The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism’" New Left Review 1977 Vol I 104 25 92
17. Brenner Robert Aston Trevor H. , Philpin C.H.E. "‘The Agrarian Roots of European Capitalism’" The Brenner Debate: Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe 1985 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
18. Bromley Simon Rethinking Middle East Politics: State Formation and Development 1994 Austin University of Texas Press
19. Cetin Tamer , Oguz Fuat The Political Economy of Regulation in Turkey 2011 New York Springer
20. Chibber Vivek Locked in Place: State-Building and Late Industrialization in India 2003 Princeton Princeton University Press
21. Comninel George Rethinking the French Revolution: Marxism and the Revisionist Challenge 1987 London Verso
22. Cox Robert W. Cox Robert W. , Sinclair Timothy J. "‘Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’" Approaches to World Order 1996 Cambridge Cambridge University Press http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607905
23. Dinler Demet "‘Türkiye’de Güçlü Devlet Geleneği Tezinin Eleştirisi’" Praksis 2003 Vol 9 17 54
24. Dufour Frédérick Guillaume "‘Social-Property Regimes and the Uneven and Combined Development of Nationalist Practices’" European Journal of International Relations 2007 Vol 13 4 583 604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354066107083148
25. Duzgun Eren "‘Class, State and Property: Modernity and Capitalism in Turkey’" European Journal of Sociology 2012 Vol 53 2 118 149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003975612000070
26. Ercan Fuat "‘Çelişkili Bir Süreklilik Olarak Sermaye Birikimi: Türkiye’de Kapitalizmin Gelişme Dinamiklerinin Anlaşılması için Marksist Bir Çerçeve Denemesi’" Praksis 2002 Vol 5 25 75
27. Ercan Fuat , Oğuz Şebnem "‘Rescaling as a Class Relationship and Process: The Case of Public Procurement Law in Turkey’" Political Geography 2006 Vol 25 6 641 656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.05.006
28. Göçek Fatma Müge Rise of the Bourgeoisie, Demise of Empire: Ottoman Westernization and Social Change 1996 Oxford Oxford University Press http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195099256.001.0001
29. Günaydın Gökhan "‘Türkiye Tarım Politikalarında “Yapısal Uyum”: 2000’li Yıllar’" Mulkiye 2009 Vol 262 175 222
30. Güran Cahit Cetin , Oguz "‘The Political Economy of Privatization in Turkey: An Evaluation’" 2011
31. Güran Tevfik Yıldız "‘Zirai Politika ve Ziraatte Gelismeler 1839–1876’" 1992
32. Haldon John F. The State and the Tributary Mode of Production 1993 London Verso
33. Helleiner Eric Stubbs Richard , Underhill Geoffrey "‘From Breton Woods to Global Finance: A World Turned Upside Down’" Political Economy and the Changing Global Order 1994 Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan
34. Heper Metin "‘The European Union, the Turkish Military and Democracy’" South European Society and Politics 2005 Vol 10 1 33 44 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13608740500037924
35. Hilton Rodney , Lefebvre Georges , Procacci Giuliano , Merrington John , Hill Christopher , Hobsbawm Eric , Dobb Maurice , Sweezy Paul , Takahashi Kohachiro The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism 1976 London New Left Books
36. Hoffmann Clemens "‘The Balkanization of Ottoman Rule: Premodern Origins of the Modern International System in Southeastern Europe’" Cooperation and Conflict 2008 Vol 43 4 373 396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010836708096881
37. Inalcık Halil "‘Land Problems in Turkish History’" The Muslim World 1955 Vol 45 3 221 228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.1955.tb02226.x
38. Insel Ahmet "‘Tanrı’nin Hikmetinden Sermayenin Hikmetine: Wallerstein Tarihi’nin Bir Eleştirisi’" Toplum ve Bilim 1984 Vol 25/6 133 148
39. Islamoğlu Huri Owen Roger "‘Property as a Contested Domain: A Reevaluation of the Ottoman Land Code of 1858’" New Perspectives on Property and Land in the Middle East 2000 Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press
40. Islamoğlu Huri The Ottoman Empire and the World-Economy 1987 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
41. Islamoğlu Huri , Keyder Çaglar Islamoglu "‘Agenda for Ottoman History’" 1987
42. Issawi Charles The Economic History of Turkey, 1800–1914 1980 Chicago The University of Chicago Press
43. Kasaba Resat The Ottoman Empire and the World Economy: The Nineteenth Century 1988 Albany State University of New York Press
44. Kasnakoğlu Haluk Richards Alan "‘Agricultural Price Support Policies in Turkey: An Empirical Investigation’" Food, States, and Peasants: Analyses of the Agrarian Question in the Middle East 1986 Boulder, CO. Westview
45. Keyder Çaglar State and Class in Turkey: A Study in Capitalist Development 1987 London Verso
46. Keyder Çaglar , Yenal Zafer "‘Agrarian Change under Globalization: Markets and Insecurity in Turkish Agriculture’" Journal of Agrarian Change 2011 Vol 11 1 60 86 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00294.x
47. Keyman Fuat "‘Modernization, Globalization and Democratization in Turkey: The AKP Experience and Its Limits’" Constellations 2010 Vol 17 2 312 327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00596.x
48. Konings Martijn , Panitch Leo Panitch , Konings "‘The Politics of Imperial Finance’" 2009
49. Kurmuş Orhan Emperyalizmin Turkiye’ye Girisi 2008 Istanbul Yordam Yayinlari
50. Lacher Hannes "‘Embedded Liberalism, Disembedded Markets: Reconceptualising the Pax Americana’" New Political Economy 1999 Vol 4 3 343 360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563469908406408
51. Lacher Hannes Bugra Ayse , Agarten Kaan "‘The Slight Transformation: Contesting the Legacy of Karl Polanyi’" Reading Karl Polanyi for the Twenty-First Century: Market Economy as a Political Project 2007 Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan
52. Maier Charles S. "‘The Politics of Productivity: Foundations of American International Economic Policy after World War II’" International Organization 1977 Vol 31 4 607 633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018634
53. Mardin Serif "‘Historical Thresholds and Stratification: Social Class and Class Consciousness’" Religion, Society, and Modernity in Turkey 2006 New York Syracuse University Press
54. Mayer Arno J. The Persistence of the Old Regime: Europe to the Great War 1981 New York Pantheon Books
55. Milor Vedat "‘A Comparative Study of Planning and Economic Development in Turkey and France: Bringing the State Back In’" 1989 PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley
56. Oğuz Şebnem "‘Globalization and Contradictions of State Restructuring in Turkey’" 2008 PhD thesis, York University, Toronto
57. Oktar Suat , Varlı Arzu "‘Demokrat Parti’nin Tarim Politikasi, 1950–4’" Marmara Üniversitesi I.I.B.F Dergisi 2010 Vol 28 1 1 22
58. Ortaylı İlber "‘Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda sanayileşme anlayışına bir örnek: Islah–ı Sanayi Komisyonu olayı’" METU Studies in Development 1978 1978 Special Issue on Turkish Economic History 123 130
59. Owen Roger The Middle East in the World Economy, 1800–1914 1981 London Methuen
60. Pamuk Şevket The Ottoman Empire and European Capitalism, 1820–1913: Trade, Investment and Production 1987 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
61. Pamuk Şevket "‘Globalization, Industrialization and Changing Politics in Turkey’" New Perspectives on Turkey 2008a Vol 38 267 273
62. Pamuk Şevket Lains Pedro , Pinilla Vicente "‘Agriculture and Economic Development in Turkey, 1870–2000’" Agriculture and Economic Development in Europe since 1870 2008b London Routledge
63. Panitch Leo , Gindin Sam Panitch , Konings "‘Finance and American Empire’" 2009
64. Panitch Leo , Konings Martjin American Empire and the Political Economy of Global Finance 2009 Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan
65. Quataert Donald Yıldız "‘Main Problems of the Economy during the Tanzimat Period’" 1992
66. Quataert Donald Quataert Donald "‘Ottoman Manufacturing in the Nineteenth Century’" Manufacturing in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey, 1500–1950 1994 Albany State University of New York Press
67. Rosenberg Justin The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations 1994 London Verso
68. Ruggie John G. "‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Post-War Economic Order’" International Organization 1982 Vol 36 2 379 415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993
69. Rupert Mark Producing Hegemony 1995 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
70. Sanlı Kerem Cem , Ardıyok Şahin Cetin , Oguz "‘The Legal Structure of Competition Policy in Turkey’" 2011
71. Shilliam Robbie "‘Hegemony and the Unfashionable Problematic of “Primitive Accumulation”’" Millenium: Journal of International Studies 2004 Vol 33 1 59 88 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03058298040330010301
72. Shilliam Robbie German Thought and International Relations: The Rise and Fall of a Liberal Project 2009 Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230234154
73. Sunar Ilkay Islamoglu "‘State and Economy in the Ottoman Empire’" 1987
74. Teoman Ozgur , Kaymak Muammer "‘Commercial Agriculture and Economic Change in the Ottoman Empire during the Nineteenth Century: A Comparison of Raw Cotton Production in Western Anatolia and Egypt’" The Journal of Peasant Studies 2008 Vol 35 2 314 334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150802151074
75. Teschke Benno The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations 2003 London Verso
76. Thompson Edward Palmer "‘The Peculiarities of the English’" Socialist Register 1965 Vol 2 311 361
77. Thompson Edward Palmer "‘The Peculiarities of the English’" The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays 1978 [1965] London Merlin
78. Timur Taner Turk Devrimi ve Sonrasi 2001 Ankara Imge Kitabevi
79. Wallerstein Immanuel , Decdeli Hale , Kasaba Reşat Islamoglu "‘The Incorporation of the Ottoman Empire into the World-Economy’" 1987
80. Watson Matthew The Political Economy of International Capital Mobility 2007 Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230592667
81. Wood Ellen Meiksins Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism 1995 Cambridge Cambridge University Press http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558344
82. Wood Ellen Meiksins "‘Back to Marx’" Monthly Review 1997a Vol 49 2 1 9 http://dx.doi.org/10.14452/MR-049-02-1997-06_1
83. Wood Ellen Meiksins "‘Modernity, Postmodernity, or Capitalism?’" Review of International Political Economy 1997b Vol 4 3 539 561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/096922997347742
84. Wood Ellen Meiksins The Origins of Capitalism 1999 New York Monthly Review Press
85. Wood Ellen Meiksins Citizens to Lords: A Social History of Western Political Thought from Antiquity to the Middle Ages 2008 London Verso
86. Yalman Galip "‘Tarihsel Bir Perspektiften Türkiye’de Devlet ve Burjuvazi: Rölativist Bir Paradigma mı Hegemonya Stratejisi mi?’" Praksis 2002 Vol 5 7 23
87. Yalvaç Faruk "‘Strategic Depth or Hegemonic Depth? A Critical Realist Analysis of Turkey’s Position in the World System’" International Relations 2012 Vol 26 2 165 180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0047117811428331
88. Yeldan Erinç "‘Neoliberal Global Remedies: From Speculative-Led Growth to IMF-Led Crisis in Turkey’" Review of Radical Political Economics 2006 Vol 38 2 193 213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0486613405285423
89. Yıldız Hakkı Dursun 150. Yilinda Tanzimat 1992 Ankara Turk Tarih Kurumu Yayinlari
90. FN1 1. Keyman 2010.
91. FN2 2. Heper 2005.
92. FN3 3. Pamuk 2008a.
93. FN4 4. Ercan and Oḡuz 2006.
94. FN5 5. Yalvaç 2012.
95. FN6 6. A large group of scholars who have written extensively on Turkey from world-systems theory (WST) and dependency-theory perspectives have especially employed this conception. See Islamoḡlu and Keyder 1987; Kasaba 1988; Wallerstein, Decdeli and Kasaba 1987; Berberoḡlu 1982. For more nuanced approaches operating within the general parameters of world-systems and dependency theories, see Sunar 1987; Keyder 1987; Pamuk 1987; Boratav 2003.
96. FN7 7. Ercan 2002; Oḡuz 2008.
97. FN8 8. Although there have been many attempts to overcome the limitations of structuralist explanations by drawing attention to the local dynamics of the Ottoman Empire and Turkey (e.g. Atasoy 2005, p. 13; Gocek 1996, pp. 17–18; Insel 1984; Yalman 2002) the critique of the Braudelian/Wallersteinian understanding of capitalism has remained largely underdeveloped. As a result, capitalism is almost unanimously assumed to exist merely by virtue of the commercial and imperialist ties linking the Empire to the capitalist world-system, which no longer presupposes the existence of capitalist social relations. Marxian approaches to Ottoman/Turkish modernity eventually fail to distinguish between the capitalist world market and capitalism, jettisoning the theory of capitalism through their exclusive focus on imperialism (compare Wood 1997a, p. 3). For a thorough critique, see Brenner 1977 and 1985. For a debate on the origins of and transition to capitalism, see Hilton, Lefebvre, Procacci, Merrington, Hill, Hobsbawm, Dobb, Sweezy and Takahashi 1976.
98. FN9 9. See Brenner 1985; Wood 1995 and 1999; Comninel 1987; Lacher 2007; Teschke 2003.
99. FN10 10. Thompson 1978, p. 84.
100. FN11 11. Wood 1999, p. 14.
101. FN12 12. Brenner 1977, p. 39.
102. FN13 13. Compare Wood 1997b.
103. FN14 14. Pamuk 1987, p. 83.
104. FN15 15. Pamuk 1987, pp. 11–12.
105. FN16 16. Teoman and Kaymak 2008, pp. 317–18.
106. FN17 17. Adanır 1989, p. 155; Güran 1992, pp. 229–30.
107. FN18 18. Islamoglu 2000; Inalcik 1955, p. 227.
108. FN19 19. Kurmuş 2008, p. 79.
109. FN20 20. Issawi 1980, pp. 37–43; Pamuk 2008b, p. 388.
110. FN21 21. Comninel 1987; Blackbourn and Eley 1984; Mayer 1981.
111. FN22 22. Shilliam 2004, p. 59.
112. FN23 23. The transformation of the sultan’s slave into modern bureaucracy was the first step to the non-capitalist modernisation of statecraft. With the Tanzimat reforms, sultans’ ‘slaves’ secured almost hereditary rights to state office without the threat of confiscation, thus enhancing their privileged status at the apex of the state. Centralisation of taxation, modern war-making and the growing importance of the diplomatic service, however, forced them to build up a larger bureaucratic apparatus. Military and civil bureaucracy recruited larger and more provincial segments of late Ottoman society – mainly ayans, esrafs and prosperous peasants – into the lower grades of the state structure, with the modern institutions of education disseminated. It is these latter recruits who revolted against the upper reaches of the bureaucracy in the period from the 1850s to the Young Turk Revolution and made access to the state more talent-based. As a consequence, the state became even more important as a means of access to the surplus, and it became organically linked to the countryside – an important source of the peasant-based populism of the Young-Turk and Kemalist modernisation. See Mardin 2006, pp. 19–20.
113. FN24 24. Both the bureaucracy and the central military grew enormously during the nineteenth century. The number of military troops increased from 24,000 regular soldiers in 1837 to 120,000 in 1849. More strikingly, there were a half-million civil-service posts in 1900 that had not existed in 1800; see Quataert 1992, p. 218. Concomitantly, just prior to the Tanzimat reforms, ‘some 70 per cent of revenues were spent on the forces of coercion – and still many soldiers went unpaid’ (see Bromley 1994, p. 54, citing Owen 1981). One has to note that this was not an instance of ‘Ottoman exceptionalism’ either. Although the sale of offices was ended, and with state positions being opened up to talent, state-careers in nineteenth-century France also retained their importance: in 1863 the salaries of the Ministry of Finance alone consumed one-quarter of the taxes it levied (see Comninel 1987, p. 202).
114. FN25 25. For the peasant resistance against the institutionalisation of private property in land, see Islamoḡlu 2000; Inalcık 1955, p. 227. For the town-dweller resistance to the establishment of factories, see Quataert 1994, pp. 92–3. For the reluctance of the Ottoman reformers to promote industrialisation in the face of societal resistance, see Ortaylı 1978, p. 125.
115. FN26 26. Hoffman 2008. For a theoretical discussion on nationalism, see Dufour 2007.
116. FN27 27. The concepts used here are borrowed from Shilliam 2009, who provides an excellent account of the processes of subject-constitution in France and Germany in comparison to the impersonality of the capitalist subject in Britain.
117. FN28 28. Wood 1995, p. 22.
118. FN29 29. Barkan 1939, p. 237.
119. FN30 30. Quataert 1992, p. 92.
120. FN31 31. Admittedly, the issue of absence of private property in the Ottoman Empire is a contentious one (see Berktay 1987; Haldon 1993). However, it must be stressed that regardless of debates on the extent to which usufruct rights were hereditary and privatised in the Ottoman Empire, there is no disagreement that these extensive usufruct rights never turned into private property de jure. For a similar interpretation of the legal status of vakıf lands, see Barnes 1986.
121. FN32 32. Anderson 1974.
122. FN33 33. Compare Wood 2008, p. 191.
123. FN34 34. Atasoy’s analysis of the postwar world-economy is, by and large, informed by Fred Block’s reading of Karl Polanyi. For similar interpretations see Ruggie 1982; Cox 1996. Based on research on the previously unknown works of Karl Polanyi, it has been recently argued that reading postwar economy as an ‘embedded’ economic form is a severe misinterpretation of Polanyi’s original point of view (see Lacher 2007).
124. FN35 35. Watson 2007, p. 30.
125. FN36 36. Helleiner 1994, pp. 165, 173; Lacher 1999, p. 356; Panitch and Gindin 2009, p. 21.
126. FN37 37. Konings and Panitch 2009, pp. 231, 241.
127. FN38 38. For an extensive analysis of Fordism as it was practised in the Ford Motor Company, see Rupert 1995.
128. FN39 39. Maier 1977, pp. 613–14.
129. FN40 40. Boratav 2003, p. 95.
130. FN41 41. Ahmad 2009, p. 188; Timur 2001, p. 93.
131. FN42 42. Two points have to be clarified here. First, I do not mean that the cases of successful late development were achieved without state intervention. However, the state provision of subsidies in such countries as South Korea and Taiwan worked to ensure that capitalists became subjected to the rules of reproduction in the international market. Likewise, the provision of subsidies to peasants to enhance productivity was compensated for by charging the peasantry above-market prices for their access to fertilisers and consumption goods (see Amsden 2001; Amsden 1985, pp. 86–7). Second, this is not to make a ‘strong state versus weak bourgeoisie’ argument. For a critique of this widely held argument, see Yalman 2002; Dinler 2003; Duzgun 2012. My intention is simply to draw attention to the historical trajectory of the constitution and consolidation of capitalism in Turkey with a particular focus on class dynamics and property regimes. For a similar analysis with a specific focus on the developmental state, see Chibber 2003.
132. FN43 43. Milor 1989, pp. 255–6.
133. FN44 44. The Agricultural Bank-provided credits to agriculture increased almost ten-fold between 1948 and 1958 (see Oktar and Varlı 2010, p. 12).
134. FN45 45. Over 25 per cent of the total value of agricultural production was procured by the state throughout the ISI years (see Kasnakoğlu 1986, p. 132). Also, the domestic terms of trade increased in favour of agriculture by 41 per cent from 1960–1 to 1975–6 (see Boratav 2003, p. 136).
135. FN46 46. Keyder 1987, p. 131.
136. FN47 47. Pamuk 2008b, p. 392.
137. FN48 48. For instance, despite significantly lower levels of productivity, manufacturing wages in Turkey were three times the level of South Korean wages in 1974, double in 1977 and still 50 per cent higher than Korean wages in 1979 (see Keyder 1987, pp. 159–61).
138. FN49 49. For a similar critique, see Shilliam 2004.
139. FN50 50. Aydın 2005, pp. 158–9.
140. FN51 51. State support for agriculture decreased from 3.2 per cent of GDP in 1999 to 0.45 per cent in 2009. See Günaydın 2009, p. 183.
141. FN52 52. Figures obtained from the Turkish Institute of Statistics, as published in 2010.
142. FN53 53. Aydın 2005, p. 152; Keyder and Yenal 2011.
143. FN54 54. Yeldan 2006; Alper and Öniş 2003.
144. FN55 55. The Antitrust Act of 1994 filled an important loophole in the Turkish legal system, for the first time putting into operation Article 167 of the 1982 Turkish Constitution that obliged the state to prevent cartelisation and monopolisation in the economy. The Competition Board, established as an ‘independent’ institution in 1997, further strengthened the rule of competition, upholding it as a constitutional responsibility (see Sanlı and Ardıyok 2011, p. 76).
145. FN56 56. While annual privatisation income was $380 million between 1980 and 2003, after 2003 it reached $6 billion annually. Also, privatisation entered the constitution only in 1999, countering for the first time the explicit constitutional references to ‘nationalisation’ and ‘use for public good’ (see Güran 2011, pp. 23, 38).
146. FN57 57. Oğuz 2008, p. 118.
147. FN58 58. Rosenberg 1994.
148. FN59 59. Duzgun 2012.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1569206x-12341262
2012-01-01
2015-08-04

Affiliations: 1: York University Toronto eduzgun@yorku.ca

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to email alerts
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Name:*
    Email:*
    Your details
    Name:*
    Email:*
    Department:*
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
     
     
     
    Other:
     
    Historical Materialism — Recommend this title to your library

    Thank you

    Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation