Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Open Access Finite vs. non-finite complementation in Post-classical and Early Byzantine Greek

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Finite vs. non-finite complementation in Post-classical and Early Byzantine Greek

  • PDF
  • HTML
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Towards a pragmatic restructuring of the complementation system?

image of Journal of Greek Linguistics

While Classical Greek has a particularly rich complementation system, in later times there is a tendency towards the use of finite complementation. In this context, Cristofaro (1996) has claimed that the Classical opposition whereby the accusative and infinitive is used for non-factive complements, and ὅτι with the indicative and the accusative and participle for factive ones, is disappearing, ὅτι being used as a ‘generic’ complementiser. In this article, I investigate to what extent Cristofaro’s (1996) claim of the pragmatic neutralisation of complementation patterns can be upheld, and whether it could be claimed that a new pragmatic opposition, in terms of ‘register’, is being established. For this purpose, I turn towards documentary papyri, a corpus which is particularly fruitful for socio-historical investigations.

Affiliations: 1: Ghent University klaas.bentein@ugent.be

10.1163/15699846-01701002
/content/journals/10.1163/15699846-01701002
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading

While Classical Greek has a particularly rich complementation system, in later times there is a tendency towards the use of finite complementation. In this context, Cristofaro (1996) has claimed that the Classical opposition whereby the accusative and infinitive is used for non-factive complements, and ὅτι with the indicative and the accusative and participle for factive ones, is disappearing, ὅτι being used as a ‘generic’ complementiser. In this article, I investigate to what extent Cristofaro’s (1996) claim of the pragmatic neutralisation of complementation patterns can be upheld, and whether it could be claimed that a new pragmatic opposition, in terms of ‘register’, is being established. For this purpose, I turn towards documentary papyri, a corpus which is particularly fruitful for socio-historical investigations.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/journals/15699846/17/1/15699846_017_01_s002_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/15699846-01701002&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/15699846-01701002
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15699846-01701002
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15699846-01701002
2017-01-01
2017-12-14

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation