Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

How to do Transregional History: A Concept, Method and Tool for Early Modern Border Research

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

This article argues that the method of transregional history offers a valuable new tool for studying early modern territorial borders. Where existing research strands do not always suffice to accommodate the complexity of such boundaries, this new concept can serve as an alternative. Firstly, transregional history points out that early modern boundaries were not the outcome of actions that were pursued at one spatial level, be it local, regional, national, transnational, or global, but existed at multiple negotiated levels at once. Secondly, the method prompts historians: a) to not predefine “the” singular border of the region under scrutiny, but to follow historical actors as they shifted from one course of action to another in dealing with these multiple borders; and b) to question what transcended the boundaries of a region instead of highlighting how they separated one “unique” area from the next. In doing so, transregional history helps to reformulate questions about territorial boundaries, to make novel heuristic choices in research where and when borders matter, and, hence, to improve our understanding of transboundary historical change.

Affiliations: 1: KU Leuven, Early Modern History Research Group, Transregionalhistory.eu violet.soen@kuleuven.be ; 2: KU Leuven, Early Modern History Research Group, Transregionalhistory.eu bram.deridder@kuleuven.be ; 3: KU Leuven, Early Modern History Research Group, Transregionalhistory.eu alexander.soetaert@kuleuven.be ; 4: KU Leuven, Early Modern History Research Group, Transregionalhistory.eu werner.thomas@kuleuven.be ; 5: KU Leuven, Early Modern History Research Group, Transregionalhistory.eu johan.verberckmoes@kuleuven.be ; 6: KU Leuven, Early Modern History Research Group, Transregionalhistory.eu sophie.verreyken@kuleuven.be

10.1163/15700658-12342541
/content/journals/10.1163/15700658-12342541
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15700658-12342541
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15700658-12342541
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15700658-12342541
2017-07-31
2017-11-23

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Journal of Early Modern History — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation