The Prospects and Pitfalls of “Just-So” Storytelling in Evolutionary Accounts of Religion
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
You must be logged in to use this functionality
AbstractI discuss problems importing evolutionary language into the study of religion. It is not impossible to do, but it is difficult to carry out properly in practice. I suggest five criteria for scholarship in the study of religion to amount to good science when incorporating such language. They are 1) avoiding just-so storytelling as much as possible 2) the requirement to add a compelling level of explanation beyond the historical narrative 3) clearly distinguishing between proximate and ultimate forms of causation and explanation, and favoring proximate causes where possible 4) addressing the specific content of religion directly as part of the narrative 5) being explicit about the genre of scholarship undertaken, whether science-writing, humanistic exploration, or some mix of the two. Wiebe and Martin’s arguments do not end up rising to the challenge that they themselves have instigated to have a truly scientific study of religion.
Full text loading...
Assmann Jan Johnston S. I. "Monotheism and polytheism" Religions of the Ancient World, A Guide 2004 Cambridge, MA Belknap/Harvard University Press
Carpenter Christopher J. "Meta-analyses of sex differences in responses to sexual versus emotional infidelity men and women are more similar than different" Psychology of Women Quarterly 2012 Vol 36 1 25 37 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414537
Davis G. Scott Believing and Acting: The Pragmatic Turn in Comparative Religion and Ethics 2012 Oxford Oxford University Press
Martin Luther H , Wiebe Don "Religious studies as a scientific discipline: The persistence of a delusion" Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2012 Vol 80 3 587 597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfs030
McCauley Robert N. "A cognitive science of religion will be difficult, expensive, complicated, radically counter-intuitive, and possible: A response to Martin and Wiebe" Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2012 Vol 80 3 605 610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfs031
Sesardic Neven "Evolution of human jealousy: A just-so story or a just-so criticism?" The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2003 December 1 Vol 33 4 427 443
Weiner Jonathan The Beak of the Finch 1994 New York, NY Vintage
Wiebe Don Martin L. , Sørensen J. "Beneath the surface of history" Past Minds: Studies in Cognitive Historiography 2011 Sheffield Equinox Press
Wrangham Robert Catching Fire: How Cooking Made us Human 2009 New York Basic Books