Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

On Naturalness, Innateness, and God-beliefs: A Reply to Shook

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Method & Theory in the Study of Religion

Shook (2017) argues that if god-beliefs are “innate,” one is obligated to be skeptical about them by virtue of their mutually incompatible plurality and nativist origin. Second, Shook suggests that even if god-beliefs are not innate, it is still epistemically vicious to believe in gods. Shook also raises concerns about using theology to motivate or interpret scientific inquiry. This response essay clarifies the character of the theories offered in the cognitive science of religion (CSR), including rejecting that innateness of god-beliefs is a common view. Shook’s primary claims are then evaluated with the conclusion that they are not adequately argued or substantiated.

Affiliations: 1: Fuller Theological Seminary 180 N. Oakland Ave., Pasadena, ca 91104 staroffice@fuller.edu

10.1163/15700682-12341399
/content/journals/10.1163/15700682-12341399
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15700682-12341399
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Atran Scott 2002 In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion Oxford, UK Oxford University Press
2. Barrett Justin L. 2012 Born Believers: The Science of Children’s Religious Beliefs New York, NY The Free Press
3. Barrett Justin L. 2011 Cognitive Science, Religion, and Theology: From Human Minds to Divine Minds West Conshohocken, PA Templeton Press
4. Barrett Justin L. 2007"Cognitive Science of Religion: What Is It and Why Is It?" Religion CompassVol 1 6 768 786 doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2007.00042.x [Crossref]
5. Barrett Justin L. 2004 Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Walnut Creek, CA AltaMira Press
6. Bering Jesse M. 2011 The Belief Instinct: The Psychology of Souls, Destiny, and the Meaning of Life New York, NY W. W. Norton & Company
7. Bersaglieri T., Sabeti P. C., Patterson N., Vanderploeg T., Schaffner S. F., Drake J. A., Rhodes M., Reich D. E., Hirschhorn J. N. 2004"Genetic Signatures of Strong Recent Positive Selection at the Lactase Gene" The American Journal of Human GeneticsVol 74 6 1111 1120 doi:10.1086/421051. pmc 1182075. pmid 15114531 [Crossref]
8. Bloom Paul 2007"Religion is Natural" Developmental ScienceVol 10 147 151 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.x [Crossref]
9. Boyer Pascal 2001 Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought New York, NY Basic Books
10. Boyer Pascal 1994 The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion Berkeley, CA University of California Press
11. Clark Kelly J., Barrett Justin L. 2010"Reformed Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion" Faith & PhilosophyVol 27 2 174 189 doi: 10.5840/faithphil201027216 [Crossref]
12. Guthrie Stewart E. 1993 Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion New York, NY Oxford University Press
13. Lawson E. Thomas, McCauley Robert N. 1990 Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture Cambridge, MA Cambridge University Press
14. McCauley Robert N. 2011 Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not New York, NY Oxford University Press
15. Pyysiäinen Ilkka 2003 How Religion Works: Towards a New Cognitive Science of Religion Leiden, Netherlands Brill
16. Schloss Jeffrey, Murray Michael 2009 The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Perspectives on the Evolution of Religion New York, NY Oxford University Press
17. Sperber Dan, Hirschfeld Lawrence A. 2004"The Cognitive Foundations of Cultural Stability and Diversity" Trends in Cognitive SciencesVol 8 1 40 46 [Crossref]
18. Tremlin Todd 2006 Minds and Gods: The Cognitive Foundations of Religion New York, NY Oxford University Press [Crossref]
19. Trigg Roger, Barrett Justin L. 2014 The Roots of Religion: Exploring the Cognitive Science of Religion Farnham, Surrey Ashgate Publishing
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15700682-12341399
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15700682-12341399
2017-11-16
2018-10-23

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Method & Theory in the Study of Religion — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation