Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Cultural Memory: Script, Recollection, and Political Identity in Early Civilizations

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Historiography East and West

This is the first chapter of Jan Assmann's book on "Cultural Memory, Script, Recollection, and Political Identity in Early Civilizations" (so far only available in German) in which the author develops a theory of collective memory in related to examples from early high cultures. The author stresses that the culture of recollection is a form of social obligation determining the identity and self-assessment of a group. It is a universal phenomenon, as every collective needs to define itself with the help of memory and thus brings about communion. The culture of recollection pertains to staking out social horizons of meaning and time. It is in one's memory that one reconstructs the Past, and it is the culture of recollection that supplies us with different forms and means of relating to the Past. Death is the most basic form of a break with the past, a break that provokes the necessity to relate to the past and stands therefore at the beginning of the culture of recollection. While the word tradition only stresses continuity, progression, and resumption, Jan Assmann introduces the notion of "cultural memory" characterized by emotive attachment as well as a deliberate reference to the past that overcomes the breach by allowing for both: memory and oblivion.

Based on the writings of the French sociologist Maurice Halbwachs, Jan Assmann discusses the possibility of collective memory as opposed to individual memory. While individuals are the carriers of memory, the memory of individuals cannot exist without the social frames a given collective defines. Recollections, even of the most intimate kind, are formed solely through communication and interaction within the scope of a social group. This implies that the individual can only remember what fits into the social frames of his or her present. Thus every historical fact is transposed into a memory figure to be substantiated by a specific place and a specific time. This form of collective memory testifies to their group membership for those who share in it. A social group that constitutes itself as a memory communion will safeguard its past mainly under two aspects: its unique character, and its duration. It will, in its self-image, emphasize external distinctions while playing down internal ones. At the very point where the past is no longer remembered, history sets in. Historiography starts where memory ends. History as the product of historiography is abstract, and the opposite of memory which is always collective, i.e. group-specific and identity-concrete.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Historiography East and West — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation