Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Correlations between frogs and pond attributes in central New South Wales, Australia: What makes a good pond?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Applied Herpetology

We assessed if certain attributes of human created ponds in a forest environment make them more favourable for use by frogs. We recorded 24 habitat variables associated with 45 ponds in a forested area of central New South Wales and compared these with counts of frogs at the ponds. We used Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) to explore which variables influenced community structure and Generalised Linear Modelling techniques to determine the variables influencing the total numbers of frogs and/or species using the ponds. We also used Zero Inflated Poisson modelling to assess which variables influenced the presence and abundance of individual species. We recorded 24 species, but only nine used a third or more of the ponds. CCA indicated that our measured variables had little influence on community structure and species did not cluster into regular associations. Species richness was significantly, but only weakly related to the measured variables, which displayed little explanatory value. Variables that significantly influenced the presence and/or abundance of individual species varied widely, but depth was most often important for the former and bank and emergent vegetation for the latter. Predicting a pond type that benefits a select group of species is not possible, but pond types beneficial to some species were identified. The results suggest that we can construct or modify ponds in forests to benefit selected species, but a range of ponds are required to benefit permanent pond breeding species.

10.1163/157075406775247012
/content/journals/10.1163/157075406775247012
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/157075406775247012
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/157075406775247012
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/157075406775247012
2006-01-01
2016-12-02

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Applied Herpetology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation