Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Swimming and jumping in a semi-aquatic frog

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Animal Biology
For more content, see Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie (Vol 1-17) and Netherlands Journal of Zoology (Vol 18-52).

Locomotion has a clear ecological relevance for many animals. As animals need to move in order to escape from predators, find food, defend territories, etc., it is expected that locomotor performance might affect an individual's survival and reproduction. Clear links have also been found between an animal's performance and its morphology. A function analysis can unravel the underlying mechanistic facets of this link.

Frogs are interesting model species because they add an extra element to this topic; they have to perform in two entirely different physical environments, particularly semi-aquatic species. However, no trade-off was found between jumping and swimming performance. Morphological correlates were found but, to understand causations, a thorough understanding of the mechanics of locomotion is required.

When comparing the mechanics of jumping and swimming, the question arises of how to ensure a sound comparison. Ideally, some measure of 'effort' has to be added to the analysis. We suggest the use of the propulsive impulse. Unexpectedly, the impulse of swimming proved to be significantly smaller than the jumping impulses during locomotion in a semi-aquatic frog, Rana esculenta, even when maximal performance had been induced in both media.

To verify our impulse calculations, we analysed the external forces during both locomotor modes. The forces during terrestrial locomotion can be measured directly using a force plate; determining the forces in water requires a more complex set-up. For that reason, we performed a DPIV (Digital Particle Image Velocimetry) analysis on the flow generated by swimming frogs. These experiments confirmed the results of our impulse calculations.

10.1163/1570756053276934
/content/journals/10.1163/1570756053276934
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1570756053276934
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1570756053276934
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1570756053276934
2005-01-01
2016-12-10

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Animal Biology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation