Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

A comparative study of the functional morphology of parapodia and setae in nereids (Polychaeta: Nereididae)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Animal Biology
For more content, see Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie (Vol 1-17) and Netherlands Journal of Zoology (Vol 18-52).

Errant polychaetes of the family Nereididae can be found in a wide range of sub- and intertidal habitats. They can burrow, crawl and swim. The latter two behaviours are primarily achieved by the use of parapodia and their attached setae. Here we compare the parapodia and setae of five species of atoke nereids living in either soft or hard substrate in a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) study. Three types of setae, found in all the worms examined, were consistently different across species, allowing us to compare setal distribution. However, neither distribution nor number of setae, or intersetal gap showed a clear dependence on substrate. Thus it appears that the morphology is not adapted to a specific substrate. This might be because both the parapodia and the setae serve multiple functions in the living animal. Location of the parapodium and the size of the intersetal gap showed some dependence on whether the atoke stage swims. However, neither the area of the parapodium nor of the setal bundles seems to relate to swimming. Phylogenetic relationships amongst the examined species, from three genera all in the subfamily Nereidinae, did not significantly influence either of the morphological parameters investigated. This study indicates that the morphology of the parapodia and setae of nereids is not adapted to any specific function, instead they are presumably important for a variety of tasks performed by the worms.

10.1163/157075606775904704
/content/journals/10.1163/157075606775904704
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/157075606775904704
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/157075606775904704
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/157075606775904704
2006-01-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Animal Biology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation