Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Out of place and out of time – towards a more integrated approach to heterochrony

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Animal Biology
For more content, see Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie (Vol 1-17) and Netherlands Journal of Zoology (Vol 18-52).

Heterochrony (changes in the relative timing of development between species) has been studied almost exclusively using morphological characters, with a focus on changes in size and shape (as a surrogate for time) between ancestral species and their descendents. Such an approach is restrictive in that it precludes the investigation of heterochronies in other, non-morphological traits and, therefore, hampers a more integrated approach to heterochrony. Such an integrated approach, where cellular, molecular and genetic approaches are used within a comparative phylogenetic framework to investigate developmental sequences, has been advocated by workers such as Smith and Raff. Here we suggest that equal emphasis should be given to the importance of physiological and ecological mechanisms that relate to changes in developmental sequence. Reviews of the history and status of physiological and ecological heterochrony reveal several examples for each, although progress has been hampered to some degree by a lack of recognition of physiological heterochrony and a lack of mechanistic understanding (heterochronies in evolutionary ecology). What emerges is that each discipline potentially brings something quite different, and complementary, to the study of heterochrony. The emergence of physiological heterochrony has arguably put the emphasis back on the object of selection and how the developing organism works: studies relating ecology and heterochrony have sought to establish whether or not there is an adaptive basis to altered sequences. We propose that any future studies of heterochrony should seek to exploit these different strengths rather than see them as merely complementary approaches.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Animal Biology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation