Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Invasive bullfrogs as predators in a Neotropical assemblage: What frog species do they eat?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Animal Biology
For more content, see Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie (Vol 1-17) and Netherlands Journal of Zoology (Vol 18-52).

Anurans are important prey for the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus, but field assessments of its diet in the context of a local prey assemblage are lacking. We aimed to identify the frog species consumed by an invasive bullfrog population in subtropical South America, and to assess their relative importance among other types of prey. Characterization of the frog assemblage in the study area also allowed us to calculate the degree of electivity of the recorded anuran prey, in order to gain insight regarding bullfrog feeding preferences and to test if the bullfrog prey composition differed from a random sample of the assemblage. A total of 32.6% of the bullfrogs had at least one anuran in the stomach contents, and post-metamorphic anurans represented 49.1% of the relative prey importance for adult bullfrogs. Anurans were preyed on by all size classes, and constituted the volumetrically most important prey category in the diet of individuals heavier than 100 g. Cycloramphidae, Hylidae and Leiuperidae were positively selected, and Hypsiboas pulchellus and Physalaemus cuvieri were the species most often taken. We found a low occurrence of cannibalism, despite the high density of bullfrogs at the study site. Our results showed that the degree of electivity differed among bullfrog prey types, suggesting that some frog species may be preyed on in a higher proportion than their relative abundance in the assemblage. Testing the clues provided by this assemblage-level approach may lead to a better assessment of the interactions between bullfrogs and the native frog fauna.

Affiliations: 1: 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; 2: 2Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Av. Efigênio Sales, 2239, CP 478, 69011-970, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil; 3: 3Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Boelter R.A. , Cechin S.Z. ( 2007) "Impact of the Bullfrog diet ( Lithobates catesbeianus– Anura, Ranidae) on native fauna: case study from the region of Agudo – RS – Brazil". Nat. Conserv., Vol 5, 115- 123.
2. Both C. , Kaefer I.L. , Santos T.G. , Cechin S.Z. ( 2008) "An austral anuran assemblage in the Neotropics: seasonal occurrence correlated with photoperiod". J. Nat. Hist., Vol 42, 205- 222.
3. Both C. , Lingnau R. , Santos-Jr A.P. , Madalozzo B. , Lima L.P. , Grant T. ( 2011) "Widespread occurrence of the American bullfrog, Lithobates catesbeianus(Shaw, 1802) (Anura: Ranidae), in Brazil". South American J. Herpetol., Vol 6, 127- 134.
4. Bury R.B. , Whelan J.A. ( 1984) Ecology and Management of the Bullfrog. Resource Publication 155, US Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.
5. Cook D.G. , Jennings M.R. ( 2007) "Microhabitat use of the California Red-legged Frog and introduced Bullfrog in a seasonal marsh". Herpetologica, Vol 63, 430- 440.[430:MUOTCR]2.0.CO;2
6. Crump M.L. , Scott N.J.J. ( 1994) "Visual encounter surveys". In: Heyer W.R. , Donnelly M.A. , McDiarmid R.W. , Hayek L.C. , Foster M.S. (Eds.) Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians, pp.  84- 92. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
7. Daszak P. , Cunningham A. , Hyatt A.D. ( 2003) "Infectious disease and amphibian population declines". Divers. Distrib., Vol 9, 141- 150.
8. Davis M.A. ( 2009) Invasion Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Doan T.M. ( 2003) "Which methods are most effective for surveying rain forest herpetofauna?" J. Herpetol., Vol 37, 72- 81.[0072:WMAMEF]2.0.CO;2
10. Giovanelli J.G.R. , Haddad C.F.B. , Alexandrino J. ( 2007) "Predicting the potential distribution of the alien invasive American Bullfrog ( Lithobates catesbeianus) in Brazil". Biol. Invasions, Vol 10, 585- 590.
11. Gotelli N.J. , Entsminger G.L. ( 2007) EcoSim: Null Models Software for Ecology (version 7). 7th ed. Acquired Intelligence Inc. and Kesay-Bear, Jericho. Available at
12. Govindarajulu P. , Price W.M.S. , Anholt B.R. ( 2006) "Introduced bullfrogs ( Rana catesbeiana) in western Canada: has their ecology diverged?" J. Herpetol., Vol 40, 249- 260.
13. Hirai T. ( 2004) "Diet composition of introduced bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana, in the Mizorogaike Pond of Kyoto, Japan". Ecol. Res., Vol 19, 375- 380.
14. Hothem R.L. , Meckstroth A.M. , Wegner K.E. , Jennings M.R. , Crayon J.J. ( 2009) "Diets of three species of anurans from the Cache Creek watershed, California, USA". J. Herpetol., Vol 43, 275- 283.
15. Jacobs J. ( 1974) "Quantitative measurement of food selection: a modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev’s electivity indices". Oecologia, Vol 14, 413- 417.
16. Kaefer I.L. , Boelter R.A. , Cechin S.Z. ( 2007) "Reproductive biology of the invasive bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianusin southern Brazil". Ann. Zool. Fenn., Vol 44, 435- 444.
17. Klein R.M. ( 1984) "Aspectos dinâmicos da vegetação do sul do Brasil". Sellowia, Vol 36, 5- 54.
18. Legendre P. , Legendre L. ( 1998) Numerical Ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
19. Lowe S. , Browne M. , Boudjelas S. , De Poorter M. ( 2000) 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species: A Selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. The Invasive Species Specialist Group, Auckland.
20. Magnusson W.E. , Lima A.P. , Silva W.A. , Araújo M.C. ( 2003) "Use of geometric forms to estimate volume of invertebrates in ecological studies of dietary overlap". Copeia, Vol 2003, 13- 19.[0013:UOGFTE]2.0.CO;2
21. Menin M. , Lima A.P. , Magnusson W.E. , Waldez F. ( 2007) "Topographic and edaphic effects on the distribution of terrestrially reproducing anurans in Central Amazonia: mesoscale spatial patterns". J. Trop. Ecol., Vol 23, 539- 547.
22. Parker I.M. , Simberloff D. , Lonsdale W.M. , Goodell K. , Wonham M. , Kareiva P.M. , Williamson M.H. , Von Holle B. , Moyle P.B. , Byers J.E. , Goldwasser L. ( 1999) "Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders". Biol. Invasions, Vol 1, 3- 19.
23. Pearl C.A. , Adams M.J. , Bury R.B. , McCreary B. ( 2004) "Asymmetrical effects of introduced Bullfrogs ( Rana catesbeiana) on native ranid frogs in Oregon". Copeia, Vol 2004, 11- 20.
24. Pinkas L. , Oliphant M.S. , Iverson I.L.K. ( 1971) "Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters". Calif. Fish Game Fish. Bull., Vol 152, 105.
25. Santos T.G. , Kop K. , Spies M.R. , Trevisan R. , Cechin S.Z. ( 2008) "Distribuição temporal e espacial de anuros em área de Pampa, Santa Maria, RS". Iheringia Sér. Zool., Vol 98, 244- 253.
26. Schloegel L.M. , Ferreira C.M. , James T.Y. , Hipolito M. , Longcore J.E. , Hyatt A.D. , Yabsley M. , Martins A.M.C.R.P.F. , Mazzoni R. , Davies A.J. , Daszak P. ( 2010) "The North American bullfrog as a reservoir for the spread of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidisin Brazil". Anim. Conserv., Vol 13, 53- 61.
27. Silva E.T. , Reis E.P. , Feio R.N. , Ribeiro Filho O.P. ( 2009) "Diet of the invasive frog Lithobates catesbeianus(Shaw, 1802) (Anura: Ranidae) in Viçosa, Minas Gerais State, Brazil". South American J. Herpetol., Vol 4, 286- 294.
28. Silva E.T. , Ribeiro Filho O.P. , Feio R.N. ( 2011) "Predation of native anurans by invasive Bullfrogs in Southeastern Brazil: Spatial variation and effect of microhabitat use by prey". South American J. Herpetol., Vol 6, 1- 10.
29. Silvano D.L. , Segalla M.V. ( 2005) "Conservação de anfíbios no Brasil". Megadiversidade, Vol 1, 79- 86.
30. Toledo L.F. , Ribeiro L.S. , Haddad C.F.B. ( 2007) "Anurans as prey: an exploratory analysis and size relationships between predators and their prey". J. Zool., Vol 271, 170- 177.
31. Wang Y. , Guo Z. , Pearl C.A. , Li Y. ( 2007) "Body size affects the predatory interactions between introduced American Bullfrogs ( Rana catesbeiana) and native anurans in China: an experimental study". J. Herpetol., Vol 41, 514- 520.[514:BSATPI]2.0.CO;2
32. Wang Y. , Li Y. ( 2009) "Habitat selection by the introduced American Bullfrog ( Lithobates catesbeianus) on Daishan Island, China". J. Herpetol., Vol 43, 205- 211.
33. Werner E.E. , Wellborn G.A. , McPeek M.A. ( 1995) "Diet composition in postmetamorphic bullfrogs and green frogs: Implications for interspecific predation and competition". J. Herpetol., Vol 29, 600- 607.
34. Wu Z. , Li Y. , Wang Y. , Adams M.J. ( 2005) "Diet of introduced bullfrogs ( Rana catesbeiana): Predation on and diet overlap with native frogs on Daishan Island, China". J. Herpetol., Vol 39, 668- 674.
35. Young B.E. , Stuart S.N. , Chanson J.S. , Cox N.A. , Boucher T.M. ( 2004) Disappearing Jewels: The Status of New World Amphibians. NatureServe, Arlington.
36. Zimmerman B.L. ( 1994) "Audio strip transects". In: Heyer W.R. , Donnelly M.A. , McDiarmid R.W. , Hayek L.C. , Foster M.S. (Eds.) Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians, pp.  9297. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Animal Biology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation