Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

A tradeoff between mate-quality recognition and species recognition in male Bufo gargarizans that co-occur with Rana catesbeiana

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Animal Biology
For more content, see Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie (Vol 1-17) and Netherlands Journal of Zoology (Vol 18-52).

Typically, anuran amphibians favor larger females as mates because larger females lay more eggs; thus, males in amplexus can increase the number of eggs fertilized, and fitness. However, males may also prefer those females that were closest to the norm for their population in overlapping populations, and these individuals do not receive the benefits of enhanced fertilization success. In this study, we test how male Bufo gargarizans choose mates in the presence and absence of an invasive species, bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana). When given a simultaneous choice between a small male and a large female toad, males discriminated between the sexes and attempted to clasp a large female. However, when one male toad was presented with a large female bullfrog and a small female toad, the males chose both with equal frequency. Therefore, male B. gargarizans appears to trade-off between species and mate-quality recognition, such that those toads co-occurring with heterospecifics do not blindly prefer mate-quality to ensure conspecific matings.

Affiliations: 1: 1Department of Biology, College of Life Science, Xinyang Normal University, SD 464000, China; 2: 2College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Maryland, USA; 3: 3School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

10.1163/15707563-00002429
/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-00002429
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-00002429
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Andersson M. ( 1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
2. Arntzen J.W. ( 1999) "Sexual selection and male mate choice in the common toad, Bufo bufo ". Ethol. Ecol. Evol., Vol 11, 407- 414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1999.9522823
3. Berven K.A. ( 1981) "Mate choice in the wood frog, Rana sylvatica ". Evolution, Vol 35, 707- 722. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408242
4. Bourne G.R. ( 1993) "Proximate costs and benefits of mate acquisition at leks of the frog Ololygon rubra ". Anim. Behav., Vol 45, 1051- 1056. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1993.1131
5. Buchanan B.W. ( 1993) "Effects of enhanced lighting on the behaviour of nocturnal frogs". Anim. Behav., Vol 45, 893- 899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1993.1109
6. Byrne P.G. , Roberts J.D. ( 1999) "Simultaneous mating with multiple males reduces fertilization success in the myobatrachid frog, Crinia georgiana ". Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., Vol 266, 717- 721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0695
7. Chen W. , Lu X. ( 2011) "Sex recognition and mate choice in male Rana kukunoris ". Herpetol. J., Vol 21, 141- 144.
8. Cheong S.K. , Sung H.C. , Park S.R. ( 2008) "Inability of mate and species recognition by male Asian toads, Bufo gargarizans ". Anim. Cell. Syst., Vol 12, 93- 96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2008.9647160
9. Clutton-Brock T.H. , Parker G.A. ( 1995) "Sexual coercion in animal 235 societies". Anim. Behav., Vol 49, 1345- 1365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1995.0166
10. Davies N.B. , Halliday T.R. ( 1979) "Competitive mate searching in male common toads Bufo bufo ". Anim. Behav., Vol 27, 1253- 1267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(79)90070-8
11. Davies N.M. , Halliday T.R. ( 1977) "Optimal mate selection in the toad Bufo bufo ". Nature, Vol 269, 56- 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/269056a0
12. Duellman W.E. , Trueb L. ( 1994) Biology of Amphibians. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
13. Elmberg J. ( 1987) "Random mating in a boreal population of European common frogs. Rana temporaria ". Holarct. Ecol., Vol 10, 193- 195.
14. Elmberg J. ( 1991) "Factors affecting male yearly mating success in the common frog Rana temporaria ". Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., Vol 28, 125- 131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00180989
15. Emlen S.T. , Oring L.W. ( 1977) "Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems". Science, Vol 197, 215- 223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.327542
16. Gagliardi-Seeley J.L. , Itzkowitz M. ( 2006) "Male size predicts the ability to defend offspring in the biparental convict cichlid Archocentrus nigrofasciatus ". J. Fish Biol., Vol 69, 1239- 1244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01174.x
17. Gerhardt H.C. , Dyson M.L. , Tanner S.D. ( 1996) "Dynamicproperties of the advertisement calls of gray tree frogs: patterns of variability and female choice". Behav. Ecol., Vol 7, 7- 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/7.1.7
18. Halliday T.R. ( 1983) "The study of mate choice". In: Bateson P. (Ed.) Mate Choice, pp.  3- 32. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Halliday T.R. , Tejedo M. ( 1995) "Intrasexual selection and alternative mating behaviour". In: Heatwole H. , Sullivan B.K. (Eds.) Amphibian Biology, Vol Vol. 2: Social behaviour, pp.  419- 468. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton.
20. Hettyey A. , Török J. , Hėvizi G. ( 2005) "Male mate choice lacking in the agile frog, Rana dalmatina ". Copeia, Vol 2, 403- 408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/CE-04-115R2
21. Howard R.D. ( 1978) "The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana ". Evolution, Vol 32, 850- 871. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2407499
22. Katsikaros K. , Shine R. ( 1997) "Sexual dimorphism in the tusked frog, Adelotus brevis(Anura: Myobatrachidae): the roles of natural and sexual selection". Biol. J. Linn. Soc., Vol 60, 39- 51.
23. Kirkpatrick M. ( 1996) "Good genes and direct selection in the evolution of mating preferences". Evolution, Vol 50, 2125- 2140. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2410684
24. Kolm N. ( 2001) "Females produce larger eggs for large males in a paternal mouthbrooding fish". Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, Vol 268, 2229- 2234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1792
25. Liao W.B. , Lu X. ( 2009a) "Sex recognition by male Andrew’s toad Bufo andrewsiin a subtropical montane region". Behav. Process., Vol 82, 100- 103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2009.04.005
26. Liao W.B. , Lu X. ( 2009b) "Male mate choice in the Andrew’s toad Bufo andrewsi: a preference for larger females". J. Ethol., Vol 27, 413- 417.
27. Liao W.B. , Lu X. ( 2011) "Proximate mechanisms leading to large male-mating advantage in the Andrew’s toad Bufo andrewsi ". Behaviour, Vol 148, 1087- 1102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/000579511X589848
28. Lu X. , Ma X.Y. , Li Y. , Fan L.Q. ( 2009) "Breeding behavior and mating system in relation to body size in Rana chensinensis, a temperate frog endemic to northern China". J. Ethol., Vol 27, 391- 400.
29. Lu X. , Ma X.Y. , Fan L.Q. , Yu T.L. ( 2010) "Opportunity for sexual selection arises at moderate densities in the frog Rana chensinensis: an experimental approach". J. Ethol., Vol 28, 257- 262.
30. MacDiarmid A.B. , Butler M.J. ( 1999) "Sperm economy and limitation in spiny lobsters". Behav. Ecol. & Sociobiol., Vol 46, 14- 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002650050587
31. Marco A. , Kiesecker J.M. , Chivers D.P. , Blaustein A.R. ( 1998) "Sex recognition and mate choice by male western toads, Bufo boreas ". Anim. Behav., Vol 55, 1631- 1635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0711
32. Marquez R. , Bosch J. ( 1997) "Male advertisement call and female preference in sympatric and allopatric midwife toads". Anim. Behav., Vol 54, 1333- 1345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0529
33. Pfennig K.S. ( 2000) "Female spadefoot toads compromise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings". Behav. Ecol., Vol 11, 220- 227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/11.2.220
34. Plath M. , Tobler M. ( 2007) "Sex recognition in surface and cave-dwelling Atlantic molly females Poecilia mexicana(Poeciliidae, Teleostei): influence of visual and non-visual cues". Acta Ethol., Vol 10, 81- 88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10211-007-0033-y
35. Robertson J.G.M. ( 1990) "Female choice increases fertilization success in an Australian frog Uperoleia laevigata ". Anim. Behav., Vol 39, 639- 645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80374-4
36. Schmidt-Nielsen K. ( 1984) Scaling: Why Is Animal Size So Important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167826
37. Stebbins R.C. , Cohen N.W. ( 1995) A Natural History of Amphibians. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
38. Sullivan B.K. , Ryan M.J. , Verrell P.A. ( 1995) "Female choice and mating system structure". In: Heatwole H. (Ed.) Amphibian Biology, Vol Vol. 2: Social behaviour, pp.  469- 517. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton.
39. Systat, I.N.C.( 1997) Statistics. Systat, Evanston, Illinois.
40. Telford S.R. , Van Sickle J. ( 1989) "Sexual selection in an African toad ( Bufo gutteralis): the roles of morphology, amplexus displacement and chorus participation". Behaviour, Vol 110, 62- 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853989X00385
41. Verrell P.A. ( 1985) "Male mate choice for large, fecund females in the red-spotted newt, Notophthalmus viridescens: how is the size assessed?" Herpetologica, Vol 41, 382- 386.
42. Wilbur H.M. , Rubenstein D.I. , Fairchild L. ( 1978) "Sexual selection in toads: the roles of female choice and male body size". Evolution, Vol 32, 264- 270. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2407594
43. Yu T.L. , Sharma M.D. ( 2012) "Sex recognition and mate choice by male Bufo gargarizansin Central China". Zool. Sci., Vol 29, 347- 350. http://dx.doi.org/10.2108/zsj.29.347
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-00002429
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-00002429
2014-01-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Animal Biology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation