Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The effect of male-male competition and ornament size on mean and variance of courtship intensity towards heterospecific and conspecific females

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Animal Biology

Discrimination between hetero- and conspecifics is the elementary choice an individual performs when searching for potential mates. The level of selectivity and strength of species discrimination is modified by variance in the quality of females, level of the male’s reproductive investment, mate search costs, and the competitive environment. The effect of the competitive environment on both species discrimination and conspecific mate choice has seldom been studied simultaneously. We experimentally manipulated territorial competition of Calopteryx splendensdamselfly males in the wild, and asked two questions. First, does increased competition influence the territorial males’ responses towards introduced heterospecific C. virgofemales. The effect of the size of the territorial males’ sexual ornaments (wing spot) on their responses towards females was also investigated. Second, does increased competition influence the territorial males’ response towards conspecific females? The effect of the size of the territorial males ornament was again investigated. The mean level of response towards heterospecific females did not change between the control (i.e., no competitors presented) and the competition (i.e., two competitors presented) treatments, but the variance of responses towards heterospecifics was greater in the competition treatment. The territorial males’ responses towards conspecific females did not change between control and competition treatments. These results indicate individual differences in the behavior of males towards heterospecifics when territorial competition was experienced. The observed pattern of discrimination might be adaptive when overall reproductive success is considered.

Affiliations: 1: 1University of Jyvaskyla, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyvaskyla, Finland; 2: 4University of Jyvaskyla, Faculty of Information Technology, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyvaskyla, Finland

10.1163/15707563-00002465
/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-00002465
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-00002465
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Amundsen T. , Forsgren E. ( 2001) "Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., Vol 98, 13155- 13160. [Crossref]
2. Anderson M. ( 1994) Sexual Selection. 1st ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
3. Barry K.L. , Kokko H. ( 2010) "Male mate choice: why sequential choice can make its evolution difficult". Anim. Behav., Vol 80, 163- 169. [Crossref]
4. Barton N.H. , Hewitt G.M. ( 1985) "Analysis of hybrid zones". Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., Vol 16, 113- 148. [Crossref]
5. Bateman A.J. ( 1948) "Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila ". Heredity, Vol 2, 349- 368. [Crossref]
6. Bateson P. (Ed.) ( 1983) Mate Choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Bel-Venner M.C. , Dray S. , Allainé D. , Menu F. , Venner S. ( 2008) "Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider". Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., Vol 275, 77- 82. [Crossref]
8. Bonduriansky R. ( 2001) "The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence". Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc., Vol 76, 305- 339. [Crossref]
9. Brown W.D. , Chimenti A.J. , Siebert J.R. ( 2007) "The payoff of fighting in house crickets: motivational asymmetry increases male aggression and mating success". Ethology, Vol 113, 457- 465. [Crossref]
10. Buchholtz C. ( 1951) "Untersuchungen an der Libellen-Gattung Calopteryx Leach, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ethologischer Fragen". Z. Tierpsychologie, Vol 8, 273- 293. [Crossref]
11. Callander S. , Backwell P.R.Y. , Jennions M.D. ( 2012) "Context-dependent male mate choice: the effects of competitor presence and competitor size". Behav. Ecol., Vol 23, 355- 360. [Crossref]
12. Candolin U. , Salesto T. ( 2009) "Does competition allow male mate choosiness in threespine sticklebacks?" Am. Nat., Vol 173, 273- 277. [Crossref]
13. Clutton-Brock T. ( 1984) "Reproductive effort and terminal investment in iteroparous animals". Am. Nat., Vol 123, 212- 229. [Crossref]
14. Clutton-Brock T. ( 2007) "Sexual selection in males and females". Science, Vol 318, 1882- 1885. [Crossref]
15. Contreras-Garduño J. , Buzatto B.A. , Serrano-Meneses M.A. , Najera-Cordero K. , Cordoba-Aguilar A. ( 2008) "The size of the red wing spot of the American rubyspot as a heightened condition-dependent ornament". Behav. Ecol., Vol 19, 724- 732. [Crossref]
16. Contreras-Garduño J. , Canales-Lazcano J. , Córdoba-Aguilar A. ( 2005) "Wing pigmentation, immune ability, fat reserves and territorial status in males of the rubyspot damselfly, Hetaerina americana ". J. Ethol., Vol 24, 165- 173.
17. Córdoba-Aguilar A. , Jiménez-Cortés J.G. , Lanz-Mendoza H. ( 2009) "Seasonal variation in ornament expression, body size, energetic reserves, immune response, and survival in males of a territorial insect". Ecol. Entomol., Vol 34, 228- 239. [Crossref]
18. Cordoba-Aguilar A. , Cordero-Rivera A. ( 2005) "Evolution and ecology of calopterygidae (Zygoptera: Odonata): status of knowledge and research perspectives". Neotrop. Entomol., Vol 34, 861- 879. [Crossref]
19. Coyne J.A. , Orr H.A. ( 2004) Speciation. 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
20. Dewsbury D.A. ( 1982) "Ejaculate cost and male choice". Am. Nat., Vol 119, 601- 610. [Crossref]
21. Dijkstra K.-D.B. , Lewington R. ( 2006) Field Guide to the Dragonflies of Britain and Europe. British Wildlife Publishing, Dorset.
22. Dumont H.J. ( 2006) "Calopterygidae". In: Field Guide to the Dragonflies of Britain and Europe, pp.  65- 71. British Wildlife Publishing, Dorset.
23. Edward D.A. , Chapman T. ( 2011) "The evolution and significance of male mate choice". Trends Ecol. Evol., Vol 26, 647- 654. [Crossref]
24. Fawcett T.W. , Johnstone R.A. ( 2003) "Mate choice in the face of costly competition". Behav. Ecol., Vol 14, 771- 779. [Crossref]
25. Forsyth A. , Montgomerie R.D. ( 1987) "Alternative reproductive tactics in the territorial damselfly Calopteryx maculata: sneaking by older males". Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., Vol 21, 73- 81. [Crossref]
26. Gibbons D.W. , Pain D. ( 1992) "The influence of river flow rate on the breeding behaviour of Calopteryxdamselflies". J. Anim. Ecol., Vol 61, 283- 289. [Crossref]
27. González-Tokman D.M. , González-Santoyo I. , Córdoba-Aguilar A. ( 2013) "Mating success and energetic condition effects driven by terminal investment in territorial males of a short-lived invertebrate". Funct. Ecol., Vol 27, 739- 747. [Crossref]
28. Grant P.R. , Grant B.R. ( 1997) "Hybridization, sexual imprinting, and mate choice". Am. Nat., Vol 149, 1- 28. [Crossref]
29. Gwynne D. ( 1981) "Sexual difference theory: Mormon crickets show role reversal in mate choice". Science, Vol 213, 779- 780. [Crossref]
30. Halliday T.R. ( 1983) "The study of mate choice". In: Bateson P. (Ed.) Mate Choice, pp.  3- 33. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
31. Härdling R. , Kokko H. ( 2005) "The evolution of prudent choice". Evol. Ecol. Res., Vol 7, 697- 715.
32. Hendrix L.J. , Carter M.W. , Scott D.T. ( 1982) "Covariance analyses with heterogeneity of slopes in fixed models". Biometrics, Vol 38, 641- 650. [Crossref]
33. Hooper R.E. , Siva-Jothy M.T. ( 1996) "Last male sperm precedence in a damselfly demonstrated by RAPD profiling". Mol. Ecol., Vol 5, 449- 452. [Crossref]
34. Humphries M.M. , Shonfield J. , Boutin S. , McAdam A.G. , Taylor R.W. ( 2012) "Territorial defence behaviour in red squirrels is influenced by local density". Behaviour, Vol 149, 369- 390. [Crossref]
35. Hyman J. , Hughes M. , Searcy W.A. , Nowicki S. ( 2004) "Individual variation in the strenght of territory defence in male song sparrows: correlates of age, territory tenure, and neighbor aggressiveness". Behaviour, Vol 141, 15- 27. [Crossref]
36. Iwasa Y. , Pomiankowski A. ( 1999) "Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution". J. Theor. Biol., Vol 200, 97- 109. [Crossref]
37. Jennions M.D. , Petrie M. ( 1997) "Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences". Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc., Vol 72, 283- 327. [Crossref]
38. Jeswiet S.B. , Lee-Jenkins S.S.Y. , Godin J.-G.J. ( 2012) "Concurrent effects of sperm competition and female quality on male mate choice in the Trinidadian guppy ( Poecilia reticulata)". Behav. Ecol., Vol 23, 195- 200. [Crossref]
39. Jordan L.A. , Brooks R.C. ( 2012) "Recent social history alters male courtship preferences". Evolution (N.Y.), Vol 66, 280- 287.
40. Jordan L.A. , Kokko H. , Kasumovic M. ( 2014) "Reproductive foragers: male spiders choose mates by selecting among competitive environments". Am. Nat., Vol 183, 638- 649. [Crossref]
41. Keränen I. , Kahilainen A. , Knott K.E. , Kotiaho J.S. , Kuitunen K. ( 2013) "High maternal species density mediates unidirectional heterospecific matings in Calopteryxdamselflies". Biol. J. Linn. Soc., Vol 108, 534- 545. [Crossref]
42. Kokko H. , Brooks R. , Jennions M.D. , Morley J. ( 2003) "The evolution of mate choice and mating biases". Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., Vol 270, 653- 664. [Crossref]
43. Koskimaki J. , Rantala M.J. , Taskinen J. , Tynkkynen K. , Suhonen J. ( 2004) "Immunocompetence and resource holding potential in the damselfly, Calopteryx virgoL." Behav. Ecol., Vol 15, 169- 173. [Crossref]
44. Kotiaho J.S. ( 2001) "Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence". Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc., Vol 76, 365- 376. [Crossref]
45. Kotiaho J.S. , Alatalo R.V. , Mappes J. , Parri S. ( 1999) "Honesty of agonistic signalling and effects of size and motivation asymmetry in contests". Acta Ethol., Vol 2, 13- 21. [Crossref]
46. Kotiaho J.S. , Puurtinen M. ( 2007) "Mate choice for indirect genetic benefits: scrutiny of the current paradigm". Funct. Ecol., Vol 21, 638- 644. [Crossref]
47. Lessells C.M. , Boag P.T. ( 1987) "Unrepeatable repeatabilities – a common mistake". Auk, Vol 104, 116- 121. [Crossref]
48. Mateos C. , Carranza J. ( 1997) "Signals in intra-sexual competition between ring-necked pheasant males". Anim. Behav., Vol 53, 471- 485. [Crossref]
49. Mautz B.S. , Jennions M.D. ( 2011) "The effect of competitor presence and relative competitive ability on male mate choice". Behav. Ecol., Vol 22, 769- 775. [Crossref]
50. Møller A.P. , Alatalo R.V. ( 1999) "Good-genes effects in sexual selection". Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., Vol 266, 85- 91. [Crossref]
51. Nuechterlein G.L. , Buitron D. ( 1998) "Interspecific mate choice by late-courting male western grebes". Behav. Ecol., Vol 9, 313- 321. [Crossref]
52. Pajunen V.I. ( 1966) "Aggressive behaviour and territoriality in a population of Calopteryx virgoL. (Odon., Calopterygidae)". Ann. Zool. Fennici, Vol 3, 201- 214.
53. Parker G.A. ( 1983) "Mate quality and mating decisions". In: Bateson P. (Ed.) Mate Choice, pp.  141- 164. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
54. Petrie M. ( 1983) "Mate choice in role reversed species". In: Bateson P. (Ed.) Mate Choice, pp.  167- 181. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
55. Pfennig K.S. ( 1998) "The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate-quality recognition". Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., Vol 265, 1743- 1748. [Crossref]
56. Pitnick S. , García-González F. ( 2002) "Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster ". Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., Vol 269, 1821- 1828. [Crossref]
57. Plaistow S. , Siva-Jothy M.T. ( 1996) "Energetic constraints and male mate-securing tactics in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens xanthostoma(Charpentier)". Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., Vol 263, 1233- 1238. [Crossref]
58. Puurtinen M. , Ketola T. , Kotiaho J.S. ( 2009) "The good-genes and compatible-genes benefits of mate choice". Am. Nat., Vol 174, 741- 752. [Crossref]
59. Qvarnström A. ( 2001) "Context-dependent genetic benefits from mate choice". Trends Ecol. Evol., Vol 16, 5- 7. [Crossref]
60. Rantala M.J. , Koskimäki J. , Taskinen J. , Tynkkynen K. , Suhonen J. ( 2000) "Immunocompetence, developmental stability and wingspot size in the damselfly Calopteryx splendensL." Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., Vol 267, 2453- 2457. [Crossref]
61. Reynolds J.D. , Gross M.R. ( 1990) "Costs and benefits of female mate choice: is there a lek paradox?" Am. Nat., Vol 136, 230- 243. [Crossref]
62. Schneider J.M. , Lucass C. , Brandler W. , Fromhage L. ( 2011) "Spider males adjust mate choice but not sperm allocation to cues of a rival". Ethology, Vol 117, 970- 978. [Crossref]
63. Schwagmeyer P.L. , Parker G.A. ( 1990) "Male mate choice as predicted by sperm competition in thirteen-lined ground squirrels". Nature, Vol 348, 62- 64. [Crossref]
64. Singer F. ( 1990) "Reproductive costs arising from incomplete habitat segregation among three species of Leucorrhiniadragonflies". Behaviour, Vol 115, 188- 202. [Crossref]
65. Siva-Jothy M.T. ( 2000) "A mechanistic link between parasite resistance and expression of a sexually selected trait in a damselfly". Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., Vol 267, 2523- 2527. [Crossref]
66. Svensson E.I. , Karlsson K. , Friberg M. , Eroukhmanoff F. ( 2007) "Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation". Curr. Biol., Vol 17, 1943- 1947. [Crossref]
67. Tomkins J.L. , Radwan J. , Kotiaho J.S. , Tregenza T. ( 2004) "Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox". Trends Ecol. Evol., Vol 19, 323- 328. [Crossref]
68. Trivers R. ( 1972) "Parental investment and sexual selection". In: Campbell B. (Ed.) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971, pp.  136- 179. Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago.
69. Tynkkynen K. , Grapputo A. , Kotiaho J.S. , Rantala M.J. , Vaananen S. , Suhonen J. ( 2008) "Hybridization in Calopteryxdamselflies: the role of males". Anim. Behav., Vol 75, 1431- 1439. [Crossref]
70. Tynkkynen K. , Kotiaho J.S. , Luojumaki M. , Suhonen J. ( 2005) "Interspecific aggression causes negative selection on sexual characters". Evolution, Vol 59, 1838- 1843. [Crossref]
71. Tynkkynen K. , Kotiaho J.S. , Luojumaki M. , Suhonen J. ( 2006) "Interspecific territoriality in Calopteryxdamselflies: the role of secondary sexual characters". Anim. Behav., Vol 71, 299- 306. [Crossref]
72. Tynkkynen K. , Raatikainen K. , Häkkilä M. , Haukilehto E. , Kotiaho J.S. ( 2009) "Alternative reproductive tactics and the propensity of hybridization". J. Evol. Biol., Vol 22, 2512- 2518. [Crossref]
73. Tynkkynen K. , Rantala M.J. , Suhonen J. ( 2004) "Interspecific aggression and character displacement in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens ". J. Evol. Biol., Vol 17, 759- 767. [Crossref]
74. Ulmar Grafe T. ( 1997) "Costs and benefits of mate choice in the lek-breeding reed frog, Hyperolius marmoratus ". Anim. Behav., Vol 53, 1103- 1117. [Crossref]
75. Van Dongen W.F.D. , Mulder R.A. ( 2008) "Male and female golden whistlers respond differently to static and dynamic signals of male intruders". Behav. Ecol., Vol 19, 1025- 1033. [Crossref]
76. Venner S. , Bernstein C. , Dray S. , Bel-Venner M.-C. ( 2010) "Make love not war: when should less competitive males choose low-quality but defendable females?" Am. Nat., Vol 175, 650- 661. [Crossref]
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-00002465
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-00002465
2015-07-16
2018-11-13

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Animal Biology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation