Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Mating pattern, female reproduction and sexual size dimorphism in a narrow-mouthed frog (Microhyla fissipes)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this advance article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality
image of Animal Biology

Affiliations: 1: College of Ecology, Lishui University, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

*Corresponding author; e-mail: zhlin1015@126.com
10.1163/15707563-17000067
/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-17000067
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-17000067
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-17000067
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-17000067
2018-09-04
2018-10-16
1. Andersson M. (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
2. Arak A. (1983) "Male-male competition and mate choice in anuran amphibians". In: Bateson P. (Ed.) Mate Choice, pp.  181-210. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
3. Bastos R.P., Haddad C.F.B. (1996) "Breeding activity of the Neotropical treefrog Hyla elegans (Anura, Hylidae)". J. Herpetol., Vol 30, 355-360. [Crossref]
4. Bell R.C., Zamudio K.R. (2012) "Sexual dichromatism in frogs: natural selection, sexual selection and unexpected diversity". Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., Vol 279, 4686-4693.
5. Böll S., Linsenmair K.E. (1998) "Size-dependent male reproductive success and size-assortative mating in the midwife toad Alytes obstetricans". Amphib. Reptil., Vol 19, 75-89. [Crossref]
6. Bourne G.R. (1993) "Proximate costs and benefits of mate acquisition at leks of the frog Ololygon rubra". Anim. Behav., Vol 45, 1051-1059. [Crossref]
7. Buzatto B.A., Thyer E.M., Roberts J.D., Simmons L.W. (2016) "Sperm competition and the evolution of precopulatory weapons: testis size and amplexus position, but not arm strength, affect fertilization success in a chorusing frog". Evolution, Vol 71, 329-341. [Crossref]
8. Cai M.Z. (2009) "Microhylidae". In: Fei L., Hu S.Q., Ye C.Y., Huang Y.Z. (Eds) Fauna Sinica, Amphibia, vol. 2 (Anura), pp.  904-910. Science Press, Beijing, China.
9. Chajma P., Vojar J. (2016) "The effect of size-assortative mating on fertilization success of the common toad (Bufo bufo)". Amphib. Reptil., Vol 37, 389-395. [Crossref]
10. Crespi B.J. (1989) "Causes of assortative mating in arthropods". Anim. Behav., Vol 38, 980-1000. [Crossref]
11. Davies N.B., Halliday T.R. (1977) "Optimal mate selection in the toad Bufo bufo". Nature, Vol 269, 56-58. [Crossref]
12. De Lisle S.P., Rowe L. (2013) "Correlated evolution of allometry and sexual dimorphism across higher taxa". Am. Nat., Vol 182, 630-639. [Crossref]
13. Dittrich C., Rodríguez A., Segev O., Drakulić S., Feldhaar H., Vences M., Rödel M.O. (2018) "Temporal migration patterns and mating tactics influence size-assortative mating in Rana temporaria". Behav. Ecol., Vol 29, 418-428. [Crossref]
14. Fairbairn D.J. (1997) "Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females". Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., Vol 28, 659-687. [Crossref]
15. Fan X.L., Lin Z.H., Ji X. (2013) "Male size does not correlate with fertilization success in two bufonid toads that show size-assortative mating". Curr. Zool., Vol 59, 740-746. [Crossref]
16. Fei L., Ye C.Y., Jiang J.P. (2012) Colored Atlas of Chinese Amphibians and Their Distributions. Sichuan Science and Technology Publishing House, Chengdu, China.
17. Gosner K.L. (1960) "A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification". Herpetologica, Vol 16, 183-190.
18. Gramapurohit N.P., Radder R.S. (2012) "Mating pattern, spawning behavior, and sexual size dimorphism in the tropical toad Bufo melanostictus (Schn.)". J. Herpetol., Vol 46, 412-416. [Crossref]
19. Green D.M. (2015) "Implications of female body-size variation for the reproductive ecology of an anuran amphibian". Ethol. Ecol. Evol., Vol 27, 173-184. [Crossref]
20. Gutiérrez G., Luddecke H. (2002) "Mating pattern and hatching success in a population of the Andean frog Hyla labialis". Amphib. Reptil., Vol 23, 281-292. [Crossref]
21. Halliday T.R., Tejedo M. (1995) "Intrasexual selection and alternative mating behaviour". In: Heatwole H., Sullivan B.K. (Eds) Amphibian Biology: Social Behaviour, pp.  419-468. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, UK.
22. Han X., Fu J.Z. (2013) "Does life history shape sexual size dimorphism in anurans? A comparative analysis". BMC Evol. Biol., Vol 13, 27. DOI:10.1186/1471-2148-13-27.
23. Krupa J.J. (1988) "Fertilization efficiency in the great plains toad Bufo cognatus". Copeia, Vol 1988, 800-802. [Crossref]
24. Kuramoto M., Joshy S.H. (2006) "Morphological and acoustic comparisons of Microhyla ornata, M. fissipes, and M. okinavensis (Anura: Microhylidae)". Curr. Herpetol., Vol 25, 15-27. [Crossref]
25. Liao W.B., Chen W. (2012) "Inverse Rensch’s rule in a frog with female-biased sexual size dimorphism". Naturwissenschaften, Vol 99, 427-431. [Crossref]
26. Liao W.B., Zeng Y., Zhou C.Q., Jehle R. (2013) "Sexual size dimorphism in anurans fails to obey Rensch’s rule". Front. Zool., Vol 10, 10. DOI:10.1186/1742-9994-10-10.
27. Liao W.B., Liu W.C., Merilä J. (2015) "Andrew meets Rensch: sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch’s rule in Andrew’s toad (Bufo andrewsi)". Oecologia, Vol 177, 389-399. [Crossref]
28. Liu C.C., Hu S.Q. (1961) Chinese Tailless Amphibians. Science Press, Beijing, China.
29. Liu W.Z., Lue S.Q. (1991) "Microhylidae Guenther". In: Yang D.T. (Ed.) The Amphibian-Fauna of Yunnan, pp.  224-247. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, China.
30. Liu S.L., Song Z.M., Zhang J.Z., He M.Y. (1996) "Studies on early embryonic development in Microhyla ornata". J. Sichuan Univ. (Nat. Sci.), Vol 33, 323-329.
31. Lou S.L., Zhao L., Lu D., Liao W.B. (2016) "Mating patterns in three Bufo andrewsi populations at different latitude". Russ. J. Ecol., Vol 47, 514-518. [Crossref]
32. Lu X., Ma X., Li Y., Fan L. (2009) "Breeding behavior and mating system in relation to body size in Rana chensinensis, a temperate frog endemic to northern China". J. Ethol., Vol 27, 391-400. [Crossref]
33. Lu D., Zhou C.Q., Liao W.B. (2014) "Pattern of sexual size dimorphism supports the inverse Rensch’s rule in two frog species". Anim. Biol., Vol 64, 87-95. [Crossref]
34. Marco A., Lizana M. (2002) "The absence of species and sex recognition during mate search by male common toads Bufo bufo". Ethol. Ecol. Evol., Vol 14, 1-8. [Crossref]
35. Marco A., Kiesecker J.M., Chivers D.P., Blaustein A.R. (1998) "Sex recognition and mate choice by male western toads, Bufo boreas". Anim. Behav., Vol 55, 1631-1635. [Crossref]
36. McGarrity M., Johnson S. (2009) "Geographic trend in sexual size dimorphism and body size of Osteopilus septentrionalis (Cuban treefrog): implications for invasion of the southeastern United States". Biol. Invasions, Vol 11, 1411-1420. [Crossref]
37. Monnet J.M., Cherry M.I. (2002) "Sexual size dimorphism in anurans". Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., Vol 269, 2301-2307. [Crossref]
38. Nali R.C., Zamudio K.R., Haddad C.F.B., Prado C.P.A. (2014) "Size-dependent selective mechanisms on males and females and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in frogs". Am. Nat., Vol 184, 727-740. [Crossref]
39. Orense M.M.D., Tejedo-Madueño M. (1990) "Size-based mating pattern in the tree frog Hyla arborea". Herpetologica, Vol 46, 176-182.
40. Robertson J.G.M. (1986) "Female choice, male strategies and the role of vocalizations in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa". Anim. Behav., Vol 34, 773-784. [Crossref]
41. Robertson J.G.M. (1990) "Female choice increases fertilization success in the Australian frog, Uperoleia laevigata". Anim. Behav., Vol 39, 639-645. [Crossref]
42. Rudoy A. (2017) "Evolution of sexual dimorphism and Rensch’s rule in the beetle genus Limnebius (Hydraenidae): is sexual selection opportunistic?" PeerJ, Vol 5, e3060. DOI:10.7717/peerj.3060. [Crossref]
43. Ryan M.J. (1980) "Female mate choice in a Neotropical frog". Science, Vol 209, 523-525. [Crossref]
44. Shine R. (1979) "Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the Amphibia". Copeia, Vol 1979, 297-306. [Crossref]
45. Székely T., Freckleton R.P., Reynolds J.D. (2004) "Sexual selection explains Rensch’s rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol 101, 12224-12227. [Crossref]
46. Taylor E.D. (1962) "The amphibian fauna of Thailand". Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., Vol 43, 265-599. [Crossref]
47. Vojar J., Puš V., Kopecký O., Chajma P., Šálek M. (2015) "The effect of sex ratio on size-a ssortative mating in two explosively breeding anurans". Amphib. Reptil., Vol 36, 149-154. [Crossref]
48. Wells K.D. (2007) The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA. [Crossref]
49. Woolbright L.L. (1983) "Sexual selection and size dimorphism in anuran Amphibia". Am. Nat., Vol 121, 110-119. [Crossref]
50. Yu T.L., Li H.J., Lu X. (2013) "Mating patterns of Rana kukunoris from three populations along an altitudinal gradient on the Tibetan Plateau". Anim. Biol., Vol 63, 131-138. [Crossref]
Submit comment
Close
Comment moderation successfully completed

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation