Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Relationship between chorusing activity and number of oviposition events in the Otton frog

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Animal Biology

Call surveys are an effective technique for detecting the presence and activity of breeding male frogs. Such surveys have been used to quantify breeding activity at a site under the assumption that male chorusing activity appropriately reflects breeding consequences, such as the number of oviposition events. However, only a few studies have actually examined the relationship between chorusing activity and breeding consequences in the field. In this study, I examined the relationship between chorusing activity (the number of male calls recorded during a five-minute period every night) and the number of oviposition events (number of oviposited egg masses during the night) of the Otton frog, Babina subaspera, with regard to the time lag between calls and oviposition. I constructed nine generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to explain the number of oviposition events by chorusing activity on the same night and on nights 1 to 7 days before the oviposition events. The Akaike information criterion (AiC) of the GLMM was lowest when the number of calls from nights 2 days before the oviposition events was used, indicating that breeding consequences in Otton frogs reflect the chorusing activity of 2 days prior. This study shows that frog call surveys can be reliable tools with which to represent breeding activity at a site as long as the time lag between chorusing activity and breeding consequences is considered.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Environment Conservation, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai-cho, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan

10.1163/15707563-17000143
/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-17000143
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-17000143
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Acevedo M.A., Villanueva-Rivera L.J. (2006) "Using automated digital recording systems as effective tools for the monitoring of birds and amphibians". Wildlife Soc. Bull., Vol 34, 211-214. [Crossref]
2. Barrett K., Guyer C., Samoray S.T., Kanno Y. (2016) "Stream and riparian habitat use by anurans along a forested gradient in western Georgia, USA". Copeia, Vol 104, 570-576. [Crossref]
3. Brooke P.N., Alford R.A., Schwarzkopf L. (2000) "Environmental and social factors influence chorusing behaviour in a tropical frog: examining various temporal and spatial scales". Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., Vol 49, 79-87. [Crossref]
4. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. 2nd Edition. Springer, New York, NY, USA.
5. Buxton V.K., Ward M.P., Sperry J.H. (2015) "Use of chorus sounds for location of breeding habitat in 2 species of anuran amphibians". Behav. Ecol., Vol 26, 1111-1118. [Crossref]
6. Canavero A., Arim M. (2009) "Clues supporting photoperiod as the main determinant of seasonal variation in amphibian activity". J. Nat. Hist., Vol 43, 2975-2984. [Crossref]
7. Courtois E.A., Michel E., Martinez Q., Pineau K., Dewynter M., Ficetola G.F., Fouquet A. (2016) "Taking the lead on climate change: modelling and monitoring the fate of an Amazonian frog". Oryx, Vol 50, 450-459. [Crossref]
8. Gerhardt H.C., Klump G.M. (1988) "Phonotactic responses and selectivity of barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) to chorus sounds". J. Comp. Physiol. A, Vol 163, 795-802. [Crossref]
9. Gosner K.L. (1960) "A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification". Herpetologica, Vol 16, 183-190.
10. Henzi S.P., Dyson M.L., Piper S.E., Passmore N.E., Bishop P. (1995) "Chorus attendance by male and female painted reed frogs (Hyperolius marmoratus): environmental factors and selection pressures". Funct. Ecol., Vol 9, 485-491. [Crossref]
11. Iwai N. (2013) "Morphology, function and evolution of the pseudothumb in the Otton frog". J. Zool., Vol 289, 127-133. [Crossref]
12. Iwai N., Watari Y. (2006) "Distribution of Ishikawa’s frog and the Otton frog on Amami Island". Bull. Herpetol. Soc. Jpn, Vol 2006, 109-114.
13. Murphy C.G. (2003) "The cause of correlations between nightly numbers of male and female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) attending choruses". Behav. Ecol., Vol 14, 274-281. [Crossref]
14. R Core Team (2015) R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at https://www.R-project.org/.
15. Reichert M.S. (2011) "Aggressive calls improve leading callers’ attractiveness in the treefrog Dendropsophus ebraccatus". Behav. Ecol., Vol 22, 951-959. [Crossref]
16. Schalk C.M., Saenz D. (2015) "Environmental drivers of anuran calling phenology in a seasonal Neotropical ecosystem". Austral Ecol., Vol 41, 16-27. [Crossref]
17. Schwartz J.J. (1994) "Male advertisement and female choice in frogs: recent findings and new approaches to the study of communication in a dynamic acoustic environment". Am. Zool., Vol 34, 616-624. [Crossref]
18. Schwartz J.J., Huth K., Hutchin T. (2004) "How long do females really listen? Assessment time for female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor". Anim. Behav., Vol 68, 533-540. [Crossref]
19. Shirose L.J., Bishop C.A., Green D.M., MacDonald C.J., Brooks R.J., Helferty N.J. (1997) "Validation tests of an amphibian call count survey technique in Ontario, Canada". Herpetologica, Vol 53, 312-320.
20. Stevens C.E., Paszkowski C.A. (2004) "Using chorus-size ranks from call surveys to estimate reproductive activity of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica)". J. Herpetol., Vol 38, 404-410. [Crossref]
21. Stevens C.E., Paszkowski C.A., Scrimgeour G.J. (2006) "Older is better: beaver ponds on boreal streams as breeding habitat for the wood frog". J. Wildl. Manage., Vol 70, 1360-1371. [Crossref]
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-17000143
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15707563-17000143
2018-03-28
2018-09-22

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Animal Biology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation