Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Measuring Christian Beliefs

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

$30.00+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Journal of Empirical Theology

This article opens with a critique on the conventional scales intended to measure Christian beliefs. It is concluded that the implicit theological approach behind Creed-alike scales is one that is taken for granted (a neo-scholastic one). The Humanistic Religious Beliefs Scale (HUMBEL) is meant to overcome this one-sidedness. Based on a critical review of two research lines, it was concluded that: a) researchers inspired by the study of Hunt (1972) failed to unravel distinct personality-based attitudes toward one and the same heritage, but that their findings unintentionally point to the existence of different religious beliefs, and b) Felling, Peters and Schreuder (1991), developed scales which represented only the concepts of absolute transcendence and absolute immanence. The concept immanent transcendence was not included. The Humanistic Religious Beliefs Scale is designed to represent a Christian elaboration on the concept of immanent transcendence, and measures to which degree the faith is put forward that God could reveal Himself in the actual contact between people. Both the Humanistic Religious Beliefs Scale and the newly developed Individualistic Religious Belief Scale (INBEL), designed to represent a Christian elaboration on absolute transcendence, and intended to measure to which degree the conviction is expressed that God is concerned with every individual separately, were administered to 455 members of Roman Catholic nuclear families who were involved with the church. Both parents and one of their children were tested. Results indicate that several criteria of external validity are met. It is concluded that Christian religiousness, is rather severely underestimated, when making use of Creed-alike scales, solely. Furthermore it was concluded that the Humanistic Religious Beliefs Scale could neutralize the paradox, that some Christians can be in favour of prejudice and authoritarianism, while others are opposed to it. Some suggestions are made for further research.


Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to email alerts
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Journal of Empirical Theology — Recommend this title to your library

    Thank you

    Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation