Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

A Game Theoretical Approach of Price Negotiation and Coordination in an Innovative Firm-Supplier Context: An Experimental Analysis

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

This article analyzes a sequential interaction between a firm and its supplier, involving negotiation in the first round and coordination between two different production activities in the second round. The evolution of the vertical relations in the manufacturing sectors reveals that the performance of the firms increasingly depends on these two dimensions. Price negotiation determines the share of the profits of the two actors, while coordination determines the performance of the overall chain. To model this sequential interaction between the supplier and the firm, we use the tools and concepts of game theory. While game theory usually considers the coordination problem as an isolated phenomenon, the originality of our work is that it examines the problem of in a context where coordination between agents is preceded by a negotiation phase. The model emphasizes the influence of the price negotiation on the coordination round. Several theoretical predictions are proposed, derived not only from the strict assumptions of game theory, but also from assumptions which relax those of game theory. These predictions are then experimentally tested. The results do not confirm the predictions of game theory. In fact, they are consistent with the predictions put forth as alternatives to the predictions of game theory. They show i) a propensity to maximize the performance of the chain, and ii) a propensity to arrive at an equitable share of the joint profit in the chain. Finally, though the experiment was not designed to study cross-cultural or international cases, the results suggest new research directions in this area.

10.1163/1571806042403045
/content/journals/10.1163/1571806042403045
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1571806042403045
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1571806042403045
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1571806042403045
2004-07-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    International Negotiation — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation