Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Nuclear Politics of Denial: South Africa and the Additional Protocol

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

AbstractSouth Africa was one of the first states to conclude an Additional Protocol with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 2002, allowing the IAEA greater right of access to safeguard nuclear activities and material. In light of this, some observers in the arms control community find it odd that South Africa’s representatives at the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) would be the main objectors to making the conclusion of an Additional Protocol a precondition for states wishing to import uranium enrichment and reprocessing technology (classified as sensitive nuclear technology and material). The South African objection should be viewed as only the most recent in a series of objections to measures that may seem obviously in line with nuclear non-proliferation. This emerging pattern in South Africa’s nuclear diplomacy and, more specifically, the objection to the Additional Protocol condition are related to its membership in the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and can be investigated through the lens of a politics of denial. Denial is the act of saying “no”, but it is also in psychological parlance the unconscious thought process manifesting a refusal to acknowledge the existence of certain unpleasant aspects of external reality. It will be argued that South Africa’s opposition to the Additional Protocol condition can be explained in the context of two instances of denial: (i) a perceived denial by the nuclear haves of what the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty codifies as an inalienable right to peaceful nuclear technology – something that South Africa is cautious to be complicit in; and (ii) the nuclear weapon states’ denial (the psychological meaning) of the unpleasant reality of a hypocritical nuclear order – something that South Africa wants to expose or at least something with which to engage to limit the effects for itself and other NAM members. The politics of denial does not yield to a pragmatist/utopian dichotomy in the nuclear realm, but instead reveals the dialectic nature of realism and idealism in nuclear politics, especially as reflected in South Africa’s nuclear diplomacy.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Political Studies, University of the Western CapeEMS Building Room 4.01.4, Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7535South


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. AFP "“SAfrica out of GNEP to keep right to enrich uranium: minister”" 2007 September 18 Available at:
2. Brazilian-Argentine Agency for Accounting and Control of Nuclear Materials Nuclear Threat Initiative n.d. Available at:
3. Carlson J. "“Letter to the editor: Additional Protocol as a condition of nuclear supply”" Arms Control Today 2011 March Washington, DC Arms Control Association
4. Carr Edward H. The Twenty Year’s Crisis 1919–1939: An introduction to the study of International Relations 1962 London, United Kingdom Macmillan and Co
5. El Baradei Mohamad Age of Deception: Nuclear diplomacy in treacherous times 2011 New York Metropolitan Books
6. Hibbs Mark "“Nuclear Suppliers Group and the IAEA Additional Protocol”" Nuclear Energy Brief 2010 August 18 Washington, DC Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Available at:
7. Hibbs Mark "“New Global Rules for Sensitive Nuclear Trade”" Nuclear Energy Brief 2011 July 28 Washington, DC Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Available at:
8. Hirsch T. "“The IAEA Additional Protocol: What it is and why it matters?”" The Nonproliferation Review 2004 Vol 11 3 140 166 [Crossref]
9. Horner D. "“NSG Revises Rules on Sensitive Exports”" Arms Control Today 2011 July/August Available at:
10. International Atomic Energy Agency "“Safeguards Techniques and Equipment”" International Nuclear Verification Series 2003 Vol 1 Available at:
11. International Atomic Energy Agency "“What we do”" n.d. Available at:
12. Joyner Daniel. H. Interpreting the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty 2011 Oxford, United Kingdom Oxford University Press [Crossref]
13. Kerr Paul K. , Holt Mark , Nikitin Mary "“Nuclear Energy Cooperation with Foreign Countries: Issues for Congress”" Congressional Research Service 2011 August 10 Available at:
14. Kimball D. "“The IAEA Additional Protocol at a glance”" Arms Control Association 2012 December Available at:
15. Kubalkova V. Kubalkova V. , Onuf N. , Kowerts P. "“The Twenty Years’ Catharsis”" International Relations in the Constructed World 1998 Armonk, N.Y. M.E. Sharpe
16. Leith R , Pretorius J. "“Eroding the Middle Ground: The Shift in Foreign Policy Underpinning South African Nuclear Diplomacy”" Politikon 2010 Vol 36 3 345 361 [Crossref]
17. Lewis J. "“Greetings from Bruxelles!”" Arms Control Wonk 2011a May 8 Available at:
18. Lewis J. "“Additional Protocol and ENR Transfers”" Arms Control Wonk 2011b 13 May Available at:
19. Marzo M. "“Additional Protocol: logic and impact”" Brazilian-Argentine Agency for Accounting and Control of Nuclear Energy 2012 Available at:
20. McGoldrick Fred Limiting Transfers of Enrichment and Reprocessing Technology: Issues, Constraints, Options 2011 Cambridge, MA Project on Managing the Atom, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School Available at:
21. Minty A. "“South African Perspectives on Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU). Statement at the International Symposium on Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU)”" International Symposium on Highly Enriched Uranium Oslo, Norway 2006 June 19–20 Available at:
22. Minty A. "“Statement by Ambassador Abdul S. Minty, Special Representative for Disarmament and Nepad at the South African Department for International Relations and Cooperation, during the General Debate of the 2010 Review Conference of Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons”" 2010 May 5 New York Available at:
23. Nassauer O. "“Nuclear energy and proliferation”" Nuclear Power: Myth and Reality 2006 Saxonwold, South Africa Heinrich Boll Foundation
24. Nuclear Suppliers Group "“The NSG – strengthening the nuclear non-proliferation regime”" NSG Plenary Meeting 2004 May 27–28 Goteborg, Sweden Available at:
25. Permanent Mission of South Africa to the United Nations "“Statement by Ambassador Abdul S. Minty, Special Representative for Disarmament and NEPAD at the South African Department for International Relations and Cooperation during the General Debate of the 2010 Review Conference of Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons”" 2010 May 5 New York Available at:
26. Pomper M.A. , Potter W.C. "“Medical isotope production: The US must follow South Africa’s lead”" Bulletin of Atomic Scientists 2010 December 17 Available at:
27. Pretorius J. "“The non-proliferation export norm and the 123 Agreement”" Indian Journal of International Law 2011 Vol 51 81 99
28. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute "“The no-undercut principle – Information exchange procedures”" n.d. Available at:
29. The White House "“Bush Urged International Action Against Spread of WMD”" 2004 11 February Washington, DC Available at:
30. World Nuclear News "“South African radioisotope production on target”" 2010 September 17 Available at:
31. Yew Y. "“Diplomacy and Nuclear Non-proliferation: Navigating the Non-Aligned Movement Discussion Paper 2011–07”" 2011 Cambridge, Massachusetts Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    International Negotiation — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation