Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Multilevel Regimes and Asserting the “Right to Negotiate:” Fitting the Public into Post-Agreement Negotiation

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

AbstractEmerging changes to post-agreement negotiation structures and actors can have important implications for the process and outcome of negotiated agreements. These innovations include the coexistence of negotiated global and regional regimes on the same policy issue, as well as civil society organizations that assert their “right to negotiate” at the domestic level to promote national compliance with regime standards and provisions. The evolution of these factors within the post-agreement negotiations of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) is used as a case study. Globalization and communications technology trends play a major role in promoting these changes.

Affiliations: 1: Center for Negotiation Analysis and Management Systems International600 Water Street SW, Washington, DC 20024USAbertspector@verizon.net

10.1163/15718069-12341264
/content/journals/10.1163/15718069-12341264
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718069-12341264
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Albin Cecilia "“Can NGOs Enhance the Effectiveness of International Negotiation?”" International Negotiation 1999 Vol 4 3 371 387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718069920848534
2. Annan Kofi "“Foreword”" The United Nations Convention Against Corruption 2004 Vienna United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
3. Babu R. Rajesh "“The United Nations Convention Against Corruption: A Critical Overview”" 2006 March 2006 Available at SSRN: .
4. Boutros-Gahali Boutros Weiss T. , Gordenker L. "“Foreword”" NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance 1996 Boulder, CO Lynne Rienner Publishers
5. Chasek Pamela Spector Bertram , Sjöstedt Gunnar , Zartman I. William "“The Negotiating System of Environment and Development in UNCED”" Negotiating International Regimes 1994 London Graham & Trotman
6. Ditmore Melissa , Wijers Marjan "“The Negotiations on the UN Protocol on Trafficking in Persons”" Nemesis 2003 Vol 4 79 88
7. Evans Robert , Jacobson Harold , Putnam Robert Double-Edged Diplomacy 1993 Berkeley, CA University of California Press
8. Institute for Security Studies 2004 “Handbook: A Comparative Analysis – SADC Protocol Against Corruption (2001), AU Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption (2003), UN Convention Against Corruption.” November 2004 Pretoria, South Africa: ISS.
9. Joutsen Matti , Graycar Adam "“When Experts and Diplomats Agree: Negotiating Peer Review of the UN Convention Against Corruption”" Global Governance 2012 Vol 18 425 439
10. Kremenyuk Victor Kremenyuk Victor "“The Emerging System of International Negotiation”" International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues 2002 second edition San Francisco, CA Jossey Bass
11. Management Systems International Public-Private Partnerships against Corruption in Russia: Final Report 2007 Washington, DC MSI
12. Management Systems International Civil Society Advocacy against Corruption: Best Practices Handbook (Promoting Citizen Engagement in Combating Corruption in Ukraine Project). 2009 Washington, DC MSI
13. Management Systems International "“Strengthening Integrity and Accountability Program 1 (SIAP 1): Annual Report – October 1, 2011–September 30, 2012”" 2012a Washington, DC MSI
14. Management Systems International "“Assistance for Afghanistan’s Anti-Corruption Authority (4A) Project: Annual Report, Year 2 – October 1, 2011–September 30, 2012”" 2012b Washington, DC MSI
15. Martin Antoine "“Implementation as the best way to tackle corruption: a study of the UNCAC and the AUC 2003”" 2011 accessed 15 June 2013 Guildford, UK Surrey Law Working Papers 07/2011 Available at:
16. Putnam Robert "“Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games”" International Organization 1988 Vol 42 3 427 460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027697
17. Schultz Jessica "“The United Nations Convention Against Corruption: A Primer for Development Practitioners”" 2007 Bergen, Norway Christen Michelsen Institute U4 Brief No. 3 (February)
18. Sjöstedt Gunnar "“NGOs in WTO Talks: Patterns of Performance and What They Mean”" International Negotiation 2012 Vol 17 1 91 114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180612X630947
19. Spector Bertram Spector Bertram , Zartman I. William "“Deconstructing the Negotiations of Regime Dynamics”" Getting It Done: Post-Agreement Negotiation and International Regimes 2003 Washington, DC United States Institute of Peace Press
20. Spector Bertram "“Promoting Negotiations Between Advocacy Groups and Government Authorities”" 2007 accessed 29 July 2013 Available at:
21. Spector Bertram Negotiating Peace and Confronting Corruption: Challenges for Post-Conflict Societies 2011 Washington, DC United States Institute of Peace Press
22. Spector Bertram "“Negotiating Anti-Corruption Reforms in Post-Conflict Societies: The Case of Afghanistan”" Brown Journal of World Affairs 2012 Vol 18 2 45 56
23. Spector Bertram , Zartman I. William Getting It Done: Post-Agreement Negotiation and International Regimes 2003 Washington, DC United States Institute of Peace Press
24. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Rules of Procedure for the Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption 2007 Vienna, Austria UNODC
25. United States Agency for International Development (USAID) "“Parliament Passes Law Promoting Transparency in Public Sector”" 2003 November 3 accessed 26 July 2013 Available at:
26. Villarreal Roberto "“Countering Corruption from One or Two Sides? Opportunities and Challenges in Cooperation between Government and Civil Society”" 2012 accessed 15 June 2013 Prepared for “Civil Society Organizations Fighting Corruption: Theory and Practice” workshop, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom, July 2012. Available at:
27. Vlassis Dimitri "“The United Nations Convention Against Corruption: A Successful Example of International Action Against Economic Crime”" Temida 2012 June 61 70 http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/TEM1202061V
28. Webb Philippa "“The United Nations Convention Against Corruption: Global Achievement or Missed Opportunity?”" Journal of International Economic Law 2005 March Vol 8 1 191 229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jielaw/jgi009
29. Zartman I. William Spector Bertram I. , Zartman I. William "“Negotiating the Rapids”" Getting It Done: Post-Agreement Negotiation and International Regimes 2003 Washington, DC United States Institute of Peace Press
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15718069-12341264
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718069-12341264
2013-01-01
2016-12-04

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    International Negotiation — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation