Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Justice and Injustice in the Fissile Material (Cutoff) Treaty

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of International Negotiation

The Fissile Material (Cutoff) Treaty (fm(c)t) has been on the negotiation agenda since 1996, but has seen little progress. This is due to a fundamental disagreement over whether emphasis should be placed on nuclear disarmament or nuclear non-proliferation. Several delegations perceive the fm(c)t as a tool to draw in states from outside the non-proliferation regime, while others understand it to be a disarmament measure that reduces quantities of fissile materials for nuclear weapons. They however, regard the unwillingness of nuclear weapon states to engage toward this end as deeply unjust. Additional disagreements also concern justice: Should there be different standards of verification? May some states continue to produce unverified military fuel? As long as the nuclear weapon states only push their interests through pure power instead of respecting the notion of justice, no progress can be expected and the non-proliferation regime will further erode.

Affiliations: 1: Peace Research Institute FrankfurtBaseler Str. 27–31, 60329


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Acheson Ray "“The Conference on Disarmament in 2009: Could Do Better.”" Disarmament Diplomacy 2009 Vol 91 Summer 2009
2. Becker-Jakob Una , Müller Harald , Seidler-Diekmann Tabea Müller Harald , Wunderlich Carmen "“Regime Conflicts and Norm Dynamics: Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons,”" Norm Dynamics in Multilateral Arms Control: Interests, Conflicts, and Justice 2013 Athens, GA University of Georgia Press 51 81
3. Bidway P. , Vanaik A. "“After the ctb. . . India’s intentions.”" The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 1997 March/April Vol 1997: 49
4. Bragin Victor , Carlson John , Hill John "“Viewpoint: Verifying A Fissile Material Production Cut-Off Treaty.”" The Non-proliferation Review 1998 Fall 97 107
5. Chellaney Brahmah "“If pushed over Test Ban Pact, India could really ‘Go Nuclear’.”" iht 1996 September 7 8 1996
6. Cowan Simon "“Future Submarine Project Should Raise Periscope for Another Look.”" cisPolicy Monographs 2012 130
7. Ewing Philip "“Nuclear submarines for Canada?”" DoD Buzz Online Defense and Acquisition Journal 2011 October 28
8. Franceschini Giorgio , Schaper Annette Nuclear Weapons Research and Modernization without Nuclear Testing. The ctbtin Danger? 2006 Vol PRIF Report No. 77 Frankfurt/M., 2006
9. Fischer Wolfgang , Stein Gotthard "“On-Site Inspections: Experiences from Nuclear Safeguarding,”" Disarmament Forum: On-site Inspections: Common Problems, Different Solutions 1993 Vol 3 45 54
10. Harvey Cole J. At Sea Over Naval heu: Expanding Interest in Nuclear Propulsion Poses Proliferation Challenges 2010 ntiWebsite, Nov. 29,
11. Hibbs Mark The Plan for iaeaSafeguards 2012 Carnegie Endowment Article, November 20, online publication:
12. Hosseinian Zahara , Dahl Frederick "“Iran Plans Nuclear-Powered Submarine: Report.”" Reuters 2012 June 12
13. iaeaWebsite "International Atomic Energy Agency" The Safeguards System of the International Atomic Energy Agency iaea-Website:
14. iaeaWebsite "International Atomic Energy Agency" A Cut-off Treaty and Associated Costs – An iaeaSecretariat Working Paper on Different Alternatives for the Verification of a Fissile Material Production Cut-Off Treaty and Preliminary Cost Estimates Required for the Verification of these Alternatives 1995 presented at the Workshop on a Cut-Off Treaty, Toronto, Canada, 17–18 January
15. infce International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation 1980 137 180 Working Group 8, Advanced Fuel Cycle and Reactor Concepts, International Atomic Energy Agency, 1980, p 43, see also Chapter 4: Research Reactors: Subgroup 8C
16. ipfm "International Panel on Fissile Material" Global Fissile Material Report 2008: Scope and Verification of a Fissile Material (Cutoff) Treaty 2008
17. ipfm "International Panel On Fissile Materials" A Fissile Material (Cut-Off) Treaty ( fmct) – A Treaty Banning the Production of Fissile Materials for Nuclear Weapons or Other Nuclear Explosive Devices 2009 February 5 2009
18. Johnson Rebecca "“Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty: The Endgame.”" Acronym 1996 April Vol No. 9 1996
19. Keller Stefan "“Some striking similarities and some telling dissimilarities between a cutoff convention and a ctbt.”" prifReports 1997 Vol No. 48 Presentation at the workshop on “The Cut-Off-Convention – Interest, Scope, Verification and Problems”, Session “Questions and Problems,” Bonn, December 12, 1996, reprinted in Annette Schaper: A Treaty on the Cutoff of Fissile Material for Nuclear Weapons What to Cover? How to Verify? 1997
20. Kessler Christian "“Technical negotiations and a political environment – Why the Hexapartite Safeguards Project Succeeded.”" Non-proliferation Review 2013 Vol 20 3 493 508
21. Kuperman Alan , von Hippel Frank "“Highly Enriched Danger.”" The New York Times 2014 March 21
22. McGoldrick Fred "“United States, in: International Panel on Fissile Material,” in International Panel on Fissile Materials" Banning the Production of Fissile Materials for Nuclear Weapons: Country Perspectives on the Challenges to a Fissile Material (Cutoff) Treaty 2008 Vol 54
23. McGoldrick Fred "“The Road Ahead for Export Controls: Challenges for the Nuclear Suppliers Group.”" Arms Control Today 2011a January/February
24. McGoldrick Fred Limiting Transfers of Enrichment and Reprocessing Technology: Issues, Constraints, Options 2011b Report Cambridge, MA Project on Managing the Atom, Harvard University
25. Meier Oliver "“The US-India Nuclear Deal: The End of Universal Non-Proliferation Efforts?”" Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft 2006 Vol 4 28 43
26. Mian Zia , Nayyar A.H. "“Playing the Nuclear Game: Pakistan and the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty.”" Arms Control Today 2010 April
27. MITRE/JASON Drell (Chair) S. , Dyson F. , Eardley D. , Garwin R. , Jeanloz R. , LeLevier R. , Panofsky W. , Schwitters R. , Treiman S. Subcritical Experiments 1997 Report MITRE/JASON, jsr-97-300,
28. Moltz James Clay "“Viewpoint: Closing The nptLoophole on Exports of Naval Propulsion Reactors.”" The Non-proliferation Review 2008 Fall 110 114
29. Müller Harald Multilateral Nuclear Fuel-Cycle Arrangements 2006 Paper commissioned by the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, No. 35
30. ntion fmct Proposed Fissile Material (Cut-off) Treaty ( fmct) online-publication:
31. ntion Brazil Submarines Brazil Submarine Import and Export Behaviour 2013 July 18 online-publication:
32. Pakistan " Pakistan’s views pursuant to resolution 67/53 entitled: “Treaty banning the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons and other explosive devices,” " 2013 adopted by the unGeneral Assembly on 03 December 2012 (on Website of unog2013)
33. Pakistan "Statement by Ambassador Zamir Akram at the Conference of Disarmament" Informal Discussions on agenda items 1 and 2 with a general focus on the ban of the production of fissile materials for nuclear weapons and other nuclear explosive devices – on the issue of scope 2014 June 05 Geneva
34. Rauf Tariq , Desjardins Marie-France "Canada’s Nuclear Submarine Program: A New Proliferation Concern" Arms Control Today 1988 December 13 18
35. Schaper Annette A Treaty on Fissile Material: Just Cutoff or More? 2011 prifReport No. 109, Frankfurt/M
36. Schaper Annette Highly Enriched Uranium, a Dangerous Substance that Should Be Eliminated 2013 prifReport No. 124, Frankfurt/M
37. Spiegel Wünsche Begehrliche Der Spiegel 2008 April 28
38. Tape James The State-Level Approach: Moving Beyond Integrated Safeguards 2008 la-ur-08-6/14, inmm/ esardaWorkshop Tokyo, October 2008
39. Tannenwald Nina "“Justice and Fairness in the Nuclear Non-proliferation Regime.”" Ethics & International Affairs 2013 Vol 27 299 317
40. ukMoD "Ministry of Defence" Historical Accounting for ukDefence Highly Enriched Uranium, A report by the Ministry of Defence on the role of historical accounting for Highly Enriched Uranium for the United Kingdom’s Defence Nuclear programmes 2006 March 2006
41. unog Views of Member States on a treaty banning the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices 2013
42. u.s.DoE 1996 United States Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Plutonium: The First 50 Years: United States Plutonium Production, Acquisition, and Utilization from 1944 through 1994, 1996
43. u.s.DoE 2006 United States Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, “Highly Enriched Uranium: Striking A Balance. A Historical Report on the United States Highly Enriched Uranium Production, Acquisition, and Utilization Activities from 1945 through September 30, 1996,” January 2001, publicly released 2006
44. Welsh Nancy "“Fairness: Perceptions of Fairness in Negotiation.”" Marquette Law Review 2004 Vol 87 754 767
45. Yudin Yury "“Multilateralization of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle – A Long Road Ahead,”" unidir 2011 2011/5

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    International Negotiation — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation