Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Reporting and Information Systems in International Environmental Agreements as a Means for Dispute Prevention – The Role of "International Institutions"

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Non-State Actors and International Law
For more content, see International Community Law Review.

Since the first United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in 1972 the number of international environmental agreements has increased steadily. These treaties not only provide for rules concerning the environment, but also establish institutions that have the function to promote the implementation of the agreement in question. The increase in international environmental agreements raised questions concerning the implementation of and the compliance with these rules. In this context suggestions were made to elaborate mechanisms and procedures which would further implementation and compliance and thus also would prevent disputes between Parties to international environmental agreements. Reporting and information systems have become a standard element of international environmental agreements. Although there are various reasons for development it has to be acknowledged that reporting and information systems have been an important means in encouraging implementation of and compliance with international environmental agreements. But certain difficulties should not be overlooked such as the burden reporting puts on parties. In particular, the increase of reporting obligations due to the growth of international and regional environmental agreements might be a drain on a country's limited resources. Harmonisation and streamlining reporting requirements under various environmental agreements might help to overcome some of the difficulties experienced by parties. On the other hand, reporting provisions have helped to increase transparency. A broader public is informed about national measures taken in implementation of international regulations by parties as well as on their effectiveness to address environmental issues. Moreover, discussion of the reports or synthesis reports prepared by secretariats in meetings of parties, such as the Conference of the Parties, draw the attention to shortcomings in implementation and compliance.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Non-State Actors and International Law — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation