Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Arguing International Law in the South China Sea Disputes: The Haiyang Shiyou 981 and USS Lassen Incidents and the Philippines v. China Arbitration

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

This article focuses on how international law is argued by the parties to the South China Sea disputes and in what context these legal arguments are presented. To this end, the article analyses three recent issues in the South China Sea: the incident involving the Haiyang Shiyou 981 drilling rig, which operated in a maritime area in dispute between Vietnam and China; the passage of the USS Lassen in the vicinity of Subi Reef, which is occupied by China; and the arbitration between the Philippines and China under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The article concludes that looking at what legal arguments are or are not made and in what broader context those arguments are placed can contribute to a better understanding of the role of international law in the South China Sea disputes.

Affiliations: 1: Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea, School of Law, Utrecht UniversityThe NetherlandsK.G. Jebsen Centre for the Law of the Sea, University of TromsøNorway

1 I would like to thank Nigel Bankes, Øystein Jensen, Erik Molenaar, Frans-Paul van der Putten, Don Rothwell and an anonymous peer reviewer for their comments on an earlier version of this article. Any errors or omissions remain the sole responsibility of the author. This article is a revised and updated version of the paper ‘Three takes on international legal argumentation in the South China Sea disputes: the Haiyang Shiyou 981 and USS Lassen incidents and the Philippines v. China arbitration’ that will be published in the proceedings of the 7th South China Sea International Conference; Cooperation for Regional Security and Development (Vung Tau City, Vietnam; 23 and 24 November 2015). I would like to thank the Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam for agreeing to the publication of this version.
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718085-12341396
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15718085-12341396
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718085-12341396
2016-06-03
2017-12-11

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation