Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Open Access “Why Should I Question a Patient’s Wish?”A Comparative Study on Physicians’ Perspectives on Their Duties to Respect Advance Directives

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

“Why Should I Question a Patient’s Wish?”A Comparative Study on Physicians’ Perspectives on Their Duties to Respect Advance Directives

  • HTML
  • PDF
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of European Journal of Health Law

This article explores factors that impede the implementation of advance directives to refuse treatment (ADs) in three European countries: England, Germany and France. Taking into account socio-cultural and legal aspects, the article shows the extent, to which the law can, and does, influence physicians’ decisions to implement ADs. The findings presented are based on qualitative interviews exploring physicians’ sense of duty to respect ADs and the reasons given for failing to implement the law. It will be argued that this depends on: 1) how strictly the legal status of ADs is defined, and 2) whether the law actually addresses the reasons why physicians may hesitate to implement ADs (e.g. uncertainty about validity, importance of patient preferences). The article emphasises the importance of doctor-patient communication and shows how the implementation of ADs could be improved by making discussions about treatment preferences a legal requirement.

Affiliations: 1: University of Oxford OxfordUK

This article explores factors that impede the implementation of advance directives to refuse treatment (ADs) in three European countries: England, Germany and France. Taking into account socio-cultural and legal aspects, the article shows the extent, to which the law can, and does, influence physicians’ decisions to implement ADs. The findings presented are based on qualitative interviews exploring physicians’ sense of duty to respect ADs and the reasons given for failing to implement the law. It will be argued that this depends on: 1) how strictly the legal status of ADs is defined, and 2) whether the law actually addresses the reasons why physicians may hesitate to implement ADs (e.g. uncertainty about validity, importance of patient preferences). The article emphasises the importance of doctor-patient communication and shows how the implementation of ADs could be improved by making discussions about treatment preferences a legal requirement.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/journals/15718093/24/5/15718093_024_05_s002_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/15718093-12341437&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/15718093-12341437
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15718093-12341437
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718093-12341437
2017-11-10
2017-11-18

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation