Cookies Policy
Cookie Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Khan v. The United Kingdom

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

$30.00+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Human Rights Case Digest

At the time of the interference with the applicant's conversations, there had existed no statutory system to regulate the use of covert listening devices in the United Kingdom. The Home Office Guidelines which existed were neither legally binding nor were they directly publicly accessible. Moreover, none of the remedies open to the applicant to challenge the alleged lack of an adequate basis in law for surveillance complied with the requirement of that a remedy must allow the competent national authority to deal with the substance of the Convention complaint and to grant appropriate relief. However, the Court's role is to determine whether, in all the circumstances of the case, including the way in which evidence was obtained, the proceedings as a whole were unfair. The Court would not exclude as a matter of principle and in the abstract that unlawfully obtained evidence might be admissible.


Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Create email alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Human Rights Case Digest — Recommend this title to your library

    Thank you

    Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation