Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Atlan v. The United Kingdom

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

$30.00+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Human Rights Case Digest

Article 6, Section 1 required in principle that the prosecution authorities should disclose to the defence all material evidence in their possession for or against the accused. However, in some cases it might be necessary to withhold certain evidence so as to preserve the fundamental rights of another individual (such as an informer whose life might be in danger) or to safeguard an important public interest (such as the need to keep secret police methods of investigation). Such non-disclosure would be acceptable under Article 6 only where strictly necessary and only where any difficulties caused to the defence were sufficiently counterbalanced by the procedures followed by the courts. The trial judge is best placed to decide whether or not the non-disclosure of public interest immunity evidence would be unfairly prejudicial to the defence.


Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to email alerts
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Human Rights Case Digest — Recommend this title to your library

    Thank you

    Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation