Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

All the King's Horses…: Probabilities and Possibilities for the Implementation of the New Title IV EC Treaty

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of European Journal of Migration and Law

After the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty, the EC Treaty will in Title IV provide the base for the development within a small number of years of EC immigration and asylum law. This is a unique opportunity to model common rules in this field according to two basic principles underlying EC law: respect for the individual and the rule of law.

However, EC Member States already adopted a large number of legal instruments relating to immigration and asylum. In this article it is investigated whether the existing acquis is suited to implement the new Title IV EC. Therefore, the acquis will be dealt with in two ways. First, a description will be given of the different ‘sources’ of European immigration and asylum law: the Amsterdam Treaty itself, the pre-Maastricht and Third Pillar acquis, the Schengen acquis and a number of proposals of the European Commission. Then the same legal instruments will be regrouped according to subject and an attempt will be made to sketch the features of existing European law with regard to abolition of internal border control, common external border control, asylum, admission and residence. Here, it will appear what the ambiguity of the past — the desire to control the number of persons coming to Europe through cooperation with other EC Member States but without restriction to sovereign powers — has brought about, or has failed to bring about. Respect for the individual and for the rule of law is no basic principle underlying the existing acquis.

This article was concluded in November 1998.

Affiliations: 1: Institute of Immigration Law, University of Leiden

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718169920958432
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15718169920958432
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718169920958432
1999-01-01
2016-12-10

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    European Journal of Migration and Law — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation