Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Self-Legitimacy, Organisational Commitment and Commitment to Fair Treatment of Prisoners: An Empirical Study of Prison Officers in Slovenia

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Recent work on legitimacy within criminal justice systems have drawn attention to self-legitimacy; that is, criminal justice professionals’ own recognition of their entitlement to power. The evidence on this aspect of legitimacy remains sparse and mainly from police studies. We know almost nothing about the self-legitimacy of prison officers. This paper contributes to filling this gap, with an empirical focus on prison officers in Slovenia. Specifically, it explores the correlates of officer self-legitimacy and the implications of self-legitimacy for commitments to the rights of prisoners and to the organisation. Results from multiple regression analyses show that quality of interpersonal relationships among officers, perceived audience legitimacy (that is, officers’ sense of their moral standing among prisoners), and distributive justice predicted self-legitimacy. Self-legitimacy was associated with increased commitment to fair treatment of prisoners but it was irrelevant to organisational commitment. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Affiliations: 1: Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, University of Maribor, Kotnikova 8, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia ; 2: Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DA, UK ; 3: School of Justice Studies, Eastern Kentucky University, 521 Lancaster Avenue, 467 Stratton, Richmond, KY 40475, USA

10.1163/15718174-25012104
/content/journals/10.1163/15718174-25012104
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718174-25012104
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Aebi M.F.,, Tiago M.M., and Burkhardt C., space i—Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2014 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2015).
2. Barker R., Legitimating Identities: The Self-Presentation of Rulers and Subjects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).
3. Bottoms A.E., ‘"Interpersonal violence and social order in prisons"’, Vol 26 Crime & Justice (1999) 205281.
4. Bottoms A., and Tankebe J., ‘"Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice"’, Vol 102 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology (2012) 119170.
5. Bottoms A., and Tankebe J.,, ‘“"Voice within”: power-holders’ perspectives on authority and legitimacy"’, in Tankebe J., and Liebling A. (eds), Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 6082.
6. Bradford B.,, Jackson J., and Hough M.,, ‘"Police futures and legitimacy: redefining good policing’", in Brown J.M. (ed.), The Future of Policing (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014a), pp. 79100.
7. Bradford B.,, Quinton P.,, Myhill A., and Porter G., ‘"Why do ‘the law’ comply? procedural justice, group identification and officer motivation in police organizations"’, Vol 11 European Journal of Criminology (2014b) 110131.
8. Crawford A.,, ‘"Plural policing in the uk: policing beyond the police"’, in Newburn T. (ed.), Handbook on Policing , 2nd edn. (Collumpton: Willan Publishing, 2008), pp. 147181.
9. Crewe B., The Prisoner Society: Power, Adaptation and Social Life in an English Prison (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2009).
10. Crewe B., ‘"Soft power in prison: implications for staff-prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy’", Vol 8 European Journal of Criminology (2011) 455468.
11. Flander B., and Meško G., ‘"Penal and prison policy on the ‘sunny side of the alps’: the swan song of Slovenian exceptionalism?’", European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research (2016) in press, doi:10.1007/s10610-015-9299-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-015-9299-1
12. Genders E., and Player E., Grendon: A Study of a Therapeutic Prison (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
13. Gilbert M.J., ‘"The illusion of structure: a critique of the classical model of organisation and the discretionary power of correctional officers"’, Vol 22 Criminal Justice Review (1997) 4964.
14. Hacin R., ‘"Pregled slovenskega penološkega raziskovanja od sredine petdesetih let dvajsetega stoletja’", Vol 66 Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo (2015) 235252.
15. Hepburn J.R., ‘"The exercise of power in coercive organisations: a study of prison guards’", Vol 23 Criminology (1985) 145164.
16. International Centre for Prison Studies (2015) World Prison Brief . Available online at (accessed 24 March 2016).
17. Kaminski M.M., and Gibbons D.C., ‘"Prison subculture in Poland’", Vol 40 Crime and Delinquency (1994) 105119.
18. Kauffman K., Prison Officers and their World (Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 1988).
19. Liebling A., ‘"Prison officers, policing and the use of discretion"’, Vol 4 Theoretical Criminology (2000) 333357.
20. Liebling A., ‘"Distinctions and distinctiveness in the work of prison officers: legitimacy and authority revisited’", Vol 8 European Journal of Criminology (2011) 484499.
21. Liebling A., and Price D., An Exploration of Staff-Prisoner Relationships at hmp Whitemoor , Research Report No. 6 (London: Prison Service, 1999).
22. Liebling A., and Price D., The Prison Officer (Wotton-under-Edge: hmp Leyhill, 2001).
23. Liebling A,, Arnold H., and Straub C., Psychological Survival Revisited: The Experience of Long-Term Imprisonment in Conditions of Maximum Security (Oxford: Unviersity Press, 2011).
24. McDermott K., and King R., ‘"Mind games: where the action is in prisons"’, Vol 28 British Journal of Criminology (1988) 357377.
25. Meško G.,, Valentinčič D., and Umek P.,, ‘"Self-assessment of professional capacity, competence and values of prison officers in Slovenian prisons’", in Meško G.,, Pagon M., and Dobovšek B. (eds), Policing in Central and Eastern Europe, Dilemmas of Contemporary Criminal Justice (Ljubljana: Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, 2004) pp. 535547.
26. Meško G.,, Fields C., and Smole T., ‘"A concise overview of penology and penal practice in Slovenia: the unchanged capacity, new standards, and prison overcrowding’", Vol 91 The Prison Journal (2011) 398424.
27. Meško G.,, Tankebe J.,, Čuvan B., and Šifrer J., ‘"Samozaznava legitimnosti policistov in pravosodnih policistov v Sloveniji: perspektive postopkovne pravičnosti nadrejenih, odnosov s sodelavci in zaznane legitimnosti policije v javnosti’", Vol 65 Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo (2014) 221231.
28. Modic M.,, Lobnikar B., and Dvojmoč M., ‘"Policijska dejavnost v Sloveniji: analiza procesov transformacije, pluralizacije in privatizacije’", Vol 16 Varstvoslovje (2014) 217241.
29. Nye J., Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York, ny: Public Affairs, 2004).
30. Pilling J., Back to Basics: Relationships in the Prison Service. Eve Saville Memorial Lecture (London: istd, 1992).
31. Reisig M.D., and Meško G., "‘Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner misconduct’", Vol 15 Psychology, Crime & Law (2009) 4159.
32. Shapira R., and Navon D., ‘"Staff-inmate co-operation in israeli prisons: towards a non-functionalist theory of total institutions"’, Vol 15 International Review of Modern Sociology (1985) 131146.
33. Sparks J.R., and Bottoms A.E., ‘"Legitimacy and order in prisons"’, Vol 46 British Journal of Sociology (1996) 4562.
34. Sparks J.R.,, Bottoms A.E., and Hay W., Prisons and the Problem of Order (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).
35. Stern V., Bricks of Shame (London: Penguin. 1987).
36. Tankebe J., ‘"Viewing things differently: the dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy’", Vol 51 Criminology (2013) 103135.
37. Tankebe J., Rightful Authority: Exploring the Structure of Police Self-Legitimacy (Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Institute of Criminology, 2014), available online at (accessed 20 April 2016).
38. Tankebe J., and Meško G.,, ‘"Police self-legitimacy, use of force, and pro-organizational behavior in Slovenia"’, In Meško G., and Tankebe J. (eds), Trust and Legitimacy in Criminal Justice: European Perspectives (Cham: Springer, 2015), pp. 261278.
39. Tyler T.R., Why People Obey the Law (London: Yale University Press, 1990).
40. Tyler T.R., ‘"Trust and legitimacy: policing in the usa and Europe"’, Vol 8 European Journal of Criminology (2011) 254266.
41. Tyler T.R., and Blader S., Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement (Philadelphia, pa: Psychology Press, 2000).
42. Tyler T.R.,, Braga A.,, Fagan J.,, Meares T., and Sampson R.,, ‘"Legitimacy and criminal justice: international perspectives’", in Tyler T.R. (ed.), Legitimacy and Criminal Justice (New York, ny: Russell Sage Foundation, 2008), pp. 929.
43. Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij (ursiks), Letno poročilo 2015 (Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za pravosodje, 2016).
44. Wolfe S.E., and Nix J., ‘"The alleged “Ferguson Effect” and Police willingness to engage in community partnership’", Vol 40 Law and Human Behavior (2016) 110.
45. Zakon o izvrševanju kazenskih sankcij (ziks-1, Enforcement of Criminal Sanctions Act) (2006), Uradni list rs (110/06).
46. Zakon o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o izvrševanju kazenskih sankcij (zsd-ziks-1, Amendments of the Enforcement of Criminal Sanctions Act). (2008), Uradni list rs (76/08).
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15718174-25012104
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718174-25012104
2017-01-12
2017-05-24

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation