Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

To their Fullest Potential?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Conceptualising the Adequacy of Children’s Living Standards for their Development

image of The International Journal of Children's Rights

In this paper a framework is proposed for conceptualising ‘fullest potential’ towards which, according to the Convention on the Rights of the Child (crc), children’s education should be directed (Article 29). Children’s development to their fullest potential is linked explicitly to their right to a standard of living adequate for their development (Article 27). The paper argues that focus on ‘fullest potential’ as a human rights issue exposes a tension between the rights of children, the obligations of parents to their children and the obligations of the state to support all children’s development.

Affiliations: 1: School of Social and Policy Studies, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia, gerry.redmond@flinders.edu.au

10.1163/15718182-02203005
/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02203005
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02203005
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Arneson R. J. , ‘ "Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare"’. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition Vol 56( 1) ( 1989): 7793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00646210
2. Atkinson A. B. , Poverty and Social Security ( Hemel Hempstead (uk): Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989).
3. Atkinson A. B. ,, ‘ "Social Exclusion, Poverty and Unemployment"’, In Exclusion, Employment and Opportunity , Atkinson A. B. ,and Hills J. , eds. ( London School of Economics: Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion, 1998).
4. Barry, B., Social Exclusion, Social Isolation and the Distribution of Income , Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, case/12, .
5. Becker G. , A Treatise on the Family , ( Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 1981).
6. Berges S. , ‘ "Why the Capability Approach is Justified"’. Journal of Applied Philosophy Vol 24( 1) ( 2007): 1625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00368.x
7. Bourdieu P. , Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste , ( Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1984).
8. Bourdieu P. , ‘The (Three) Forms of Capital’, in Handbook of Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education , Richardson, J. G., ed. (New York: Greenwald Press, 1986).
9. Bourdieu P. ,, and Passeron J.-C. , Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture . Translated by R. Nice, R. ( London: Sage, 1990).
10. Bowers Andrews A. ,, ‘ "Securing Adequate Living Conditions for Each Child’s Development"’, in Implementing the un Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Standard of Living Adequate for Development , Bowers Andrews A. ,and Kaufman N. Hevener , eds. ( Westport, Connecticut and London: Praeger, 1999).
11. Brighouse H. ,, and Swift A. , ‘ "Legitimate Parental Partiality"’. Philosophy & Public Affairs Vol 37( 1) ( 2009): 4380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.01145.x
12. Brighouse H. ,, and Unterhalter E. ,, "‘Primary goods Versus Capabilities: Considering the Debate in relation to Equalities in Education"’, in Capabilities - Handlungsbefahigung und Verwirklichungschancen in der Erziehungswissenschaft , Otto H.-U. ,and Ziegler H. , eds. ( Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 2008).
13. Burchardt T. ,, Le Grand J. ,, and Piachaud D. ,, ‘ "Degrees of Exclusion: Developing a Dynamic Multidimensional Measure"’, in Understanding Social Exclusion , Hills J. ,, Julian L. G. ,and Piachaud D. , eds. ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
14. Burchardt T. ,, and Zaidi A. , ‘ "Comparing Incomes when Needs Differ: Equivalization for the Extra Costs of Disability in the u.k."’. Review of Income and Wealth Vol 51( 1) ( 2005): 89114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2005.00146.x
15. Chapman A. R. , ‘ "A “Violations Approach” for Monitoring the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights"’. Human Rights Quarterly Vol 18( 1) ( 1996): 2366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hrq.1996.0003
16. Committee on the Rights of the Child, The Aims of Education. (United Nations, 2001). Original edition.
17. Committee on the Rights of the Child, General comment No. 15 (2013) on the right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health (art. 24) , Geneva, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner on Human Rights, crc/c/gc/15, Adopted by the Committee at its sixty-second sexxion (14 January – 1 February 2013), .
18. Conger R. D. ,, and Donnellan M. B. , ‘ "An Interactionist Perspective on the Socioeconomic Context of Human Development"’. Annual Review of Psychology Vol 58( 1) ( 2007): 175199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551
19. Craven M. , The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Perspective on its Development , ( Oxford Clarendon Press, 1995).
20. Deneulin S. , ‘ "Perfectionism, Paternalism and Liberalism in Sen and Nussbaum’s Capability Approach"’, Review of Political Economy Vol 14( 4) ( 2002): 497518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0953825022000009924
21. Hatcher R. , ‘ "Class Differentiation in Education: Rational Choices?"’. British Journal of Sociology of Education Vol 19( 1) ( 1998): 524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142569980190101
22. Himmelfarb G. , The Idea of Poverty: England in the Early Industrial Age ( New York: Knopf, 1984).
23. Hodgkin R. ,, and Newell P. , Implementation Handbook for the Convention on the Rights of the Child . 3rd ed, ( New York: UNICEF, 2007).
24. Hurka T. , Perfectionism , ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).
25. Johnstone R. L. ,, and Ámundadóttir A. , 2011. "Defending Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Iceland’s Financial Crisis". The Yearbook of Polar Law Online , .
26. Lareau A. , Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003).
27. Levitas R. ,, Pantazis C. ,, Fahmy E. ,, Gordon D. ,, Lloyd E. ,and Patsios D. , The Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Social Exclusion , Bristol, Department of Sociology and School for Social Policy, Townsend Centre for the International Study of Poverty, and Bristol Institute for Public Affairs, University of Bristol, January 2007, .
28. Lister R. , Poverty , ( Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2004).
29. mceetya , Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians , Carlton, Vic., Ministerial Council on Education Employment Training and Youth Affairs, December 2008, .
30. Murray C. , Losing Ground: American Social Policy 1950–1980 , ( New York: Basic books, 1984).
31. Murray C. , Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960–2010 Crown Forum, 2012).
32. Nolan A. 2013. "Economic and Social Rights, Budgets and the Convention on the Rights of the Child". The International Journal of Children’s Rights , .
33. Nussbaum M. , Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach , ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
34. Nussbaum M. C. , ‘ "Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice"’. Feminist Economics Vol 9( 2–3) ( 2003): 3359.
35. Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights, Human Rights and Poverty Reduction: A Conceptual Framework, Geneva and New York, United Nations, HR/PUB/04/1,
36. Pogge T. , ‘ "Can the Capability Approach Be Justified?"’. Philosophical Topics Vol 30( 2) ( 2002): 167228. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philtopics200230216
37. Pogge T. , World Poverty and Human Rights ( Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2008).
38. Redmond G. ,, ‘ "Poverty and Social Exclusion"’, in Handbook of Child Well-being , Ben-Arieh A. ,, Frones I. ,, Casas F. ,and Korbin J. , eds. ( Dordrecht: Springer, 2013): 1387–1426.
39. Robeyns, I., The Capability Approach: An Interdisciplinary Introduction, University of Amsterdam, Department of Political Science, and Amsterdam School of Social Sciences Research.
40. Rogers G. ,, ‘ "What is Special About a Social Exclusion Approach?"’, in Social Exclusion: Rhetoric, Reality, Responses , Rogers G. ,, Gore C. ,and Figueredo J. B. , eds. (Geneva: International Institute of Labour Studies, United Nations Development Programme, 1995).
41. Ruggeri Laderchi C. ,, Saith R. ,and Stewart F. , ‘ "Does it matter that we do not agree on the definition of poverty? A comparison of four approaches"’. Oxford Development Studies Vol 31( 3) ( 2003): 243272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360081032000111698
42. Saito M. , ‘ "Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach to Education: A Critical Exploration"’. Journal of Philosophy of Education Vol 37( 1) ( 2003): 1733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.3701002
43. Sen A. , ‘ "A Sociological Approach to the Measurement of Poverty: A Reply to Professor Peter Townsend"’. Oxford Economic Papers Vol 37( 4) ( 1985): 669676.
44. Sen A. , The Standard of Living ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).
45. Sen A. , Inequality Re-examined ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992).
46. Sen A. , Development as Freedom ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
47. Sen A. , ‘ "Why Health Equity?"’, Health Economics Vol 11( 8) ( 2002): 659666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.762
48. Sen A. , ‘ "Elements of a Theory of Human Rights"’. Philosophy & Public Affairs Vol 32( 4) ( 2004): 315356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00017.x
49. Sen A. , The Idea of Justice ( London: Allen Lane, 2009).
50. Stewart F. , ‘ "Basic Needs Strategies, Human-Rights, and the Right to Development"’. Human Rights Quarterly Vol 11( 3) ( 1989): 347374. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/762098
51. u.s. Department of Education, Blueprint for Reform: The Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act , Washington, DC, United States Department of Education, March 2010, .
52. United Nations, Convention on the Rights of the Child , Adopted and Opened for Signature, Ratification and Accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25, 20 November 1989, .
53. White S. , ‘ "Being, Becoming and Relationship: Conceptual Challenges of a Child Rights Approach in Development"’, Journal of International Development Vol 14( 8) ( 2002): 10951104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jid.950
54. Wolff J. ,, and de-Shalit A. , Disadvantage , ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02203005
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02203005
2014-10-27
2018-07-18

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    The International Journal of Children's Rights — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation