Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Conditional Residence for Unauthorised Immigrant Parents

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Responding to the Social Membership Claims of their Children

In this article, I argue that states have a long-term public policy interest in applying the best interests of the child standard that they use for domestic child welfare determinations in immigration cases that involve deportable non-citizen parents. But I also recognise that the interests of existing citizens in effective immigration regulation and enforcement need to be taken into consideration. The burden lies with parents who entered and continued to reside without authorisation in a country to show that their right to remain is of benefit to existing citizens. This means that unauthorised immigrant parents should only be given conditional permission to stay in their children’s country of long-term residence to raise them. Otherwise deportable parents should not be immediately legalised outright. Rather, they should be held to account for discharging their duty to their children in the same manner as immigrants whose residence is conditional for other reasons.

Affiliations: 1: Assistant Professor, Graduate International Relations Department, St. Mary’s University, San Antonio, tx, USA, msullivan6@stmarytx.edu

10.1163/15718182-02204003
/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02204003
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02204003
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. 8 c.f.r. §240.21(a)(1), “ "Cancellation of Removal"”, Federal Immigration Laws and Regulations . ( St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 2011).
2. Abrams K. , “ "Immigration Status and the Best Interests of the Child Standard”", Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law 2006( Vol 14( 1)), 87102.
3. Abrams K. , “ "Immigration Law and the Regulation of Marriage”", Minnesota Law Review 2007( Vol 91( 6)), 16251709.
4. Acosta v. Gaffney, 558 F.2d 1153 ( u.s.3 rdCir. 1977).
5. Adoption and Safe Families Act, H.R. 867” 105 thCongress, 1 stSession. 19 November 1997.
6. Stat Alaska . § 47.05.065(4)–(5) (LexisNexis through 2007 1st Sess.).
7. Alba R. ,and Waters M.C. , The Next Generation: Immigrant Youth in a Comparative Perspective . ( New York: NYU Press, 2011).
8. Alston P. ,and Gilmour-Walsh B. , The Best Interests of the Child: Towards a Synthesis of Children’s Rights and Cultural Values ( Florence, Italy: Unicef, 1996).
9. Appell A.B. , “ "Protecting Children or Punishing Mothers: Gender, Race and Class in the Child Protection System",” South Carolina Law Review 1997( Vol 48( 3)), 577613.
10. Baum J. ,, Jones R. ,and Barry C. , In the Child’s Best Interest? The Consequences of Losing a Lawful Immigrant Parent to Deportation ( Berkeley, CA: University of California, International Human Rights Clinic, 2010).
11. Bark v. Immigration and Naturalization Service 511 F.2d 1200 ( u.s. 9th Cir. 1975).
12. Bean F.D. et al., “ "The Educational Legacy of Unauthorised Migration: Comparisons Across u.s.Immigrant Groups in How Parents’ Status Affects their Offspring”", International Migration Review 2011( Vol 45( 2)), 348385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2011.00851.x
13. Belliveau M. , “ "Gendered Matters: Undocumented Mexican Mothers in the Current Policy Context”", Affilia 2011( Vol 26( 1)), 3246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886109910392534
14. Bhabha J. , “ "The Mere Fortuity of Birth: Are Children Citizens?" Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 2004( Vol 15( 2)), 91117.
15. Bhabha J. (2009a), “ "Arendt’s Children: Do Today’s Children Have the Right to Have Rights”", Human Rights Quarterly 2009a( Vol 31( 2)), 410451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0072
16. Bhabha J. ,( 2009b), “ "The Mere Fortuity of Birth"”, in Benhabib S. ,and Resnik J. , eds., Migrations and Mobilities: Citizenship, Borders, and Gender . ( New York: NYU Press, 2009): pp. 187227.
17. Blake C. , “ "Citizenship, Law and the State: The British Nationality Act of 1981”", Modern Law Review 1982( Vol 45( 2)), 179197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1982.tb02476.x
18. Bledsoe C. H. ,and Sow P. ., “ "Back to Africa: Second Chances for the Children of West African Immigrants”", Journal of Marriage and the Family 2011( Vol 73( 4)), 747762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00843.x
19. Bloemraad I. ,and de Graauw E. , “ "Immigrant Integration and Policy in the United States: A Loosely Stitched Patchwork"”, Working Paper Series, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, ucBerkeley . 7 April 2011. Available Online: , last accessed: 10 September 2013.
20. Boehm D. ,, “ "Here/Not Here: Contingent Citizenship and Transnational Mexican Children"”, Coe Cati ,, Reynolds Rachel R. ,, Boehm Deborah A. ,, Meredith Hess Julia ,and Rae-Espinoza Heather eds., Everyday Ruptures: Children, Youth and Migration in Global Perspective . ( Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 2011): pp. 161173.
21. Brabeck K. ,and Xu Q. , “ "The Impact of Detention and Deportation on Latino Immigrant Children and Families: A Quantitative Exploration”", Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Studies 2010( Vol 32( 3)), 341361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739986310374053
22. Breen C. , The Standard of the Best Interests of the Child ( The Hague: Brill | Nijhofff, 2002).
23. Brilmayer L. ,and Starr S. , “ "Family Separation as a Violation of International Law”", Berkeley Journal of International Law 2003( Vol 21), 213287.
24. Capps R. et al., Paying the Price: The Impact of Immigration Raids on America’s Children ( Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 2007).
25. Carreón G.P. ,, Drake C. ,and Barton A.C. , “ "The Importance of Presence: Immigrant Parents' School Engagement Experiences”", American Educational Research Journal 2005( Vol 42( 3)), 465498. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312042003465
26. “ "Changes to Citizenship by Birth in New Zealand 2006 faqs"”, The New Zealand Department of
27. Affairs Internal , available online: , last accessed: 10 September 2013.
28. Chaudry A. , et al., Facing Our Future: Children in the Aftermath of Immigration Enforcement ( Urban Institute: Washington, DC, 2010).
29. Chaudry A. , “ "Children in the Aftermath of Immigration Enforcement”", Journal of the History of Children and Youth 2011( Vol 4( 1)), 137154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hcy.2011.0010
30. Dettlaff A.J. , “ "Latino Children of Immigrants in the Child Welfare System: Preliminary Findings From the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being"”, The Intersection of Immigration and Child Welfare: Emerging Issues and Implications ( Conference Proceedings, Chicago, Ill. 13April 2008).
31. “ "Development, Relief and Education Act for Minors of 2011, S. 952"” (United States Senate), 112 thCongress, 1 stSession, 11 May 2011.
32. Eichner M. , The Supportive State . ( New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).
33. Elster J. , “ "Solomonic Judgments: Against the Best Interests of the Child”", University of Chicago Law Review 1987( Vol 54( 1)), 145. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1599714
34. Feere J. , Birthright Citizenship in the United States: A Global Comparison . ( Washington, DC: Center for Immigration Studies, 2010).
35. Ferguson A. , “ "Not Without My Daughter: Deportation and the Termination of Parental Rights”", Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 2007( Vol 22( 1)), 85104.
36. Gandara P. ,and Contreras F. , The Latino Education Crisis: The Consequences of Failed Social Policies . ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).
37. Gibson M.A. ,, Hidalgo N.E. , “ "Bridges to Success in High School for Migrant Youth"”, Teachers College Record . 2009( Vol 111( 3)), 683711.
38. Glen P. , “ "The Removability of Non-Citizen Parents and the Best Interests of Citizen Children"”, Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper 1121( 2011).
39. Goldstein J. ,, Solnit A.J. ,, Goldstein S. ,and Freud A. . The Best Interests of the Child: The Least Detrimental Alternative ( New York: The Free Press, 1996).
40. Guttin A. , “ "The Criminal Alien Program",” Immigration Policy Center Special Report (February, 2010). Available Online: , last accessed: 10 September 2013.
41. Hall C. E. , “ "Where Are My Children … And My Rights? Parental Rights Termination as a Consequence of Deportation"”, Duke Law Journal 2011( Vol 60( 6)), 14591503.
42. Hansen R. , “ "Immigration and Immigration Reform in the United States: An Outsider’s View”", The Forum 2009( Vol 7( 3)), 113.
43. Hernandez-Truyol B. , “ "Children and Immigration: International, Local and Social Responsibilities”", Boston University Public Interest Law Journal 2006( Vol 15), 297317.
44. Human Rights Watch, A Costly Move: Far and Frequent Transfers Impede Hearings for Immigrant Detainees in the United States ( Washington, DC: Human Rights Watch, 2011).
45. Honohan I. ,, “ "Bounded Citizenship and the Meaning of Citizenship Laws: Ireland’s Jus Soli Citizenship Referendum"” in Cardinal L. ,and Brown N. eds., Managing Diversity: Practices of Citizenship in Australia, Canada and Ireland . ( Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press, 2007): pp. 6387.
46. Honohan I. , “ "Reconsidering the Claim to Family Reunification in Migration”", Political Studies 2009( Vol 57( 4)), 768787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00761.x
47. Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments of 1986 ( imfa), Pub L. 99–639, 100 Stat. 3537, 10 November 1986.
48. “ "Immigration Act of 1990"”, Pub L. 101–649, 104 Stat. 4978, 5085–5086, 19 November 1990.
49. In re c-v-t- , 22 I. & N. Dec. 7 ( b.i.a. 1998).
50. In re Monreal-Aguinaga , 23 I. & N. Dec. 56 ( b.i.a. 2001).
51. Ignatius S. ,and Stickney E. ., Immigration Law and the Family: 2011 Edition . St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 2011.
52. Jastram K. ,, “ "Family Unity"” in Aleinikoff Alexander ,and Chetail Vincent et al. eds. Migration and International Legal Norms ( The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2003): 185201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-459-2_11
53. Johnson E. I. ,and Waldfogel J. ,, “ "Parental Incarceration: Effects on Child Welfare"” in Yarber Annice ,and Sharp Paul L. eds., Focus on Single Parent Families: Past and Future ( abc- cilo: Santa Barbara, ca, 2010): 8699.
54. Joppke C. , Citizenship and Immigration ( London: Polity Press, 2010).
55. Kelly J.B. , “ "The Best Interests of the Child: A Concept in Search of Meaning”", Family Court Review 1997( Vol 35( 4)), 377387.
56. Kohm L.M. , “ "Tracing the Foundations of the Best Interests of the Child Standard in American Jurisprudence”", Journal of Law and Family Studies 2008( Vol 10), 337376.
57. Kremer J.D. ,, Moccio K.A. ,and Hammell J.W. ., Severing a Lifeline: The Neglect of Citizen-Children in America’s Enforcement Policy . ( Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 2009).
58. Legomsky S.H. , “ "Rationing Family Values in Europe and America: An Immigration Tug of War Between States and their Supra-National Associations",” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 2011( Vol 25( 4)), 807858.
59. Lopez D. ,, “ "Wither the Flock"” in Alba Richard ,, Raboteau Albert J. ,and DeWind Josh , Immigration and Religion in America: Comparative and Historical Perspectives . ( New York: NYU Press, 2009): pp. 7198.
60. Lopez M.P. , “ "A Tale of Two Systems: Analyzing the Treatment of Noncitizen Families in State Family Law Systems and Under the Immigration Law System”", Harvard Latino Law Review 2008( Vol 11), 229246.
61. Martinez-Cabrera A. , “ "Deported Woman Reunited With Citizen-Children"”, El Paso Times , 8 July 2011. Available online: , last accessed: 10 September 2013.
62. Matter of Marin , 16 I. & N. Dec. 581 (B.I.A. 1978).
63. McAdam J. , “ "Seeking Asylum Under the Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Case for Complementary Protection”", International Journal of Children’s Rights 2006( Vol 14), 251275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181806778458130
64. McClain L. , The Place of Families ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).
65. McCollum I. W. (Bill), Jr., “ "Comments on H.R. 3737, Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments of 1986"”, 26 September 1986. Congressional Record. ( Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986), H27015-H27017.
66. McFarland M. ,and Spangler E.M. , “ "A Parent’s Undocumented Status Should Not Be Considered Under the Best Interests of the Child Standard”", William Mitchell Law Review 2008( Vol 35( 1)), 247282.
67. Mendelson M. ,, Strom S. ,and Wishnie M. , Collateral Damage: An Examination of ice’s Fugitive Operations Program . ( Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute, 2009).
68. Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 u.s.390 ( 1923).
69. Morton J. , Deportation of Parents of u.s.-Born Citizens Fiscal Year 2011 Report to Congress Second Semi-Annual Report , ( US Immigration and Customs Enforcement: Washington, DC, 2012).
70. Mullally S. , “ "Citizenship and Family Life in Ireland: Asking the Question ‘Who Belongs’”", Legal Studies 2005( Vol 25), 578600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2005.tb00685.x
71. Nessel L.A. , “ "Families at Risk: How Errant Enforcement and Restrictionist Integration Policies Threaten the Immigrant Family in the United States and Europe"”, Hofstra Law Review ( Vol 36( 4)), 12711302.
72. Oforji v. Ashcroft , 354 F.3d 609, 620–621 ( u.s.7 thCir. 2003).
73. Olivares M. , “ "A Final Obstacle: Barriers to Divorce for Immigrant Victims of Domestic Violence”", Hamline Law Review 2011( Vol 34( 2)), 149204.
74. Parham v. J. R ., 442 u.s.584 ( 1979).
75. Passel J. ,, and Cohn D. . “ "Unauthorized Immigrant Population: National and State Trends 2010"”, Pew Hispanic Center Reports . ( Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center, February 2011). Available online: , last accessed 10 September 2013.
76. Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 u.s.510 ( 1925).
77. Plyler v. Doe, 457 u.s.202 ( 1982).
78. Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 u.s.158 ( 1944).
79. Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 u.s.246 ( 1978).
80. Rabin N. , “ "Disappearing Parents: Immigration Enforcement and the Child Welfare System"”, Connecticut Law Review 2011( Vol 44( 1)), 99160.
81. Rubenstein K. , “ "Citizenship and the Centenary: Inclusion and Exclusion in 20 thCentury Australia”", Melbourne University Law Review 2000( Vol 24( 3)), 576608.
82. Ruffer G.B. , “ "Pushed Beyond Recognition? The Liberality of Family Reunification Policies in the eu”", Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 2011( Vol 37( 6)), 935951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2011.576196
83. Santosky v. Kramer, 455 u.s.745 ( 1982).
84. Schuck P.H. , “ "The Morality of Immigration Policy”", San Diego Law Review 2008( Vol 45( 4)), 865898.
85. Seminara D. , “ "Hello, I Love You, Won’t You Tell Me Your Name: Inside the Green Card Marriage Phenomenon"”, Center for Immigration Studies Backgrounder ( 2008).
86. Sherlock C. ,, “ "Gender, Family Unity and Migration: Discourses and Dilemmas”"in Stalford Helen ,, Currie Samantha ,and Velluti Samantha , eds., Gender and Migration in 21 st Century Europe(Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2009): pp. 223240.
87. Skinner R.L. , Removals Involving Illegal Alien Parents of u.s. citizen-children . ( Washington, DC: Office of the Inspector General, 2009).
88. Stanley v. Illinois, 405 u.s.645 ( 1972).
89. Tangeman A.S. , Endgame: Office of Detention and Removal Strategic Plan, 2003–2012: Detention and Removal Strategy for a Secure Homeland ( Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2003).
90. Taylor P. , et al., Unauthorized Immigrants: Length of Residency, Patterns of Parenthood ( Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center, 2011).
91. Thompson G. , “ "After Losing Freedom, Some Immigrants Face Loss of Custody of Their Children"”, The New York Times , 22 April 2009. Available online: , last accessed: 10 September 2013.
92. Thronson D. , “ "Choiceless Choices: Deportation and the Parent-Child Relationship”", Nevada Law Journal 2006( Vol 6( 3)), 11651214.
93. Thronson D. , ( 2008a), “ "Creating Crisis: Immigration Raids and the Destabilization of Immigrant Families”", Wake Forest Law Review 2008a( Vol 43( 2)), 391418.
94. Thronson D. , ( 2008b), “ "Custody and Contradictions: Exploring Immigration Law as Federal Family Law in the Context of Child Custody",” Hastings Law Journal 2008 ( Vol 59( 3)), 453514.
95. Thronson D. ,, “ "Clashing Values and Cross Purposes: Immigration Law’s Marginalization of Children and Families”"in Bhabha Jacqueline , ed., Children Without a State(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011): pp. 238254.
96. Thronson D. ,, and Sullivan F.P. , “ "Family Courts and Immigration Status”", Juvenile and Family Court Journal 2012( Vol 63( 1)), 118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2011.01068.x
97. Troxel v. Granville, 530 u.s.57 ( 2000).
98. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, Fraud Referral Sheet ( Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security, 2010). Available online: , last accessed 10 September 2013.
99. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, Instructions for I–751, Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence ( Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security, 2013). Available online: , last accessed 10 September 2013.
100. u.s.Department of Health and Human Services, Determining the Best Interests of the Child: Summary of State Laws ( Washington, DC: Child Welfare Information Gateway, 2008).
101. u.s.State Department, “ "Visa Bulletin for October 2013"”, Vol. Vol 9, Number 61.” Available online: , last accessed 10 September 2013.
102. Velazquez S.C. ,and Dettlaff A.J. , “ "Immigrant Children and Child Welfare in the United States: Demographics, Legislation, Research, Policy, and Practice Impacting Public Services”", Child Indicators Research 2011( Vol 4( 4)), 679695. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12187-011-9111-9
103. “ "Violence Against Women Act"”, u.s.Pub. L. 103–322, 108 Stat. 1796, 1902–1955 ( 1994).
104. Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act”, u.s.Pub. L. No. 109–162 ( 2005).
105. Walzer M. , Spheres of Justice . ( New York: Basic Books, 1983).
106. Warburton W. , et al., “ "The Impact of Placing Adolescent Males into Foster Care on their Education, Income Assistance and Incarceration"”, izaDiscussion Paper 5429 (January 2011). Available online: , last accessed 10 September 2013.
107. Warner R. S. , “ "The Role of Religion in the Process of Segmented Assimilation”", Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2007( Vol 612), 100115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716207301189
108. Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 u.s.702 ( 1997).
109. Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 u.s.205 ( 1972).
110. Yoshikawa H. , Immigrants Raising Citizens: Undocumented Parents and their Young Children . ( New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2011).
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02204003
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02204003
2014-12-01
2018-04-21

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    The International Journal of Children's Rights — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation