Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Theorising Children’s Rights and Child Welfare Paradigms

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

By employing the principles and standards of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), this paper explores the significance and implications of children’s rights for child welfare, with a specific focus on theoretical paradigms of practice. Reform discussions in child welfare scholarship often have centred on deficiencies in the Anglo-American child protection paradigm associated with liberal welfare states. Alternative paradigms are contrasted, most notably the family service approach to child welfare generally found in Nordic, social democratic welfare states. Whilst the CRC supports a family service paradigm, the paper highlights disturbing tendencies in reform discussions that are traceable to theoretical roots in the widely adopted and referenced Esping-Andersen/Gilbert classifications of cultures and child welfare paradigms. Whilst the classifications have proven to be useful, the paper explores the need for a more nuanced and complex characterisation of cultures and paradigms, to avoid misunderstandings and conceptual confusion. In particular, children’s rights often are associated only with liberal welfare states and child protection paradigms, and therefore adopting a family service paradigm is conceptualised as moving away from a children’s rights or child protection focus. In fact, a children’s rights framework for child welfare would establish provision, protection and participation as equal and interrelated priorities, whilst still emphasising the importance of a child-centred analysis.

Affiliations: 1: Nipissing University, Bracebridge, on, Canada, tomw@nipissingu.ca

10.1163/15718182-02401007
/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02401007
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02401007
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. An-Na’im A. A. (ed.), Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011).
2. An-Na’im A., “"Cultural Transformation and Normative Consensus on the Best Interests of the Child"”, International Journal of Law and the Family Vol 8 (1994): 6281.
3. Alcock P., and Craig G. (2nd Executive Director,.), International Social Policy: Welfare Regimes in the Developing World (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).
4. Alston P., and Goodman R. International Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).
5. Andersen J. G.,, Guillemard A.,, Jensen Per H., and Pfau-Effinger B., The Changing Face of Welfare. Consequences and outcomes from a citizenship perspective (Bristol: The Policy Press, 2005).
6. Andersson G. Child and Family Welfare in Sweden in Freymond, N. and Cameron, G., Towards Positive Systems of Child and Family Welfare (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006): 171190.
7. Bronfenbrenner U., "Ecological Systems Theory". Annals of Child Development , Vol 6 (1989):187249.
8. Cameron G.,, Coady N., and Adams G., Moving Toward Positive Systems of Child and Family Welfare (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2007).
9. Clapman A., Human Rights: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
10. Conway J., The Canadian Family in Crisis (Toronto: James Lorimer & Company Ltd., 2003).
11. Covell K., and Howe R. B., The Challenge of Children’s Rights for Canada (Waterloo, on: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2001).
12. Covell K., and Howe R. B., Children, Families and Violence: Challenges for Children’s Rights (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2009).
13. Daniel P., and Ivatts J., Children and Social Policy (London: Macmillan, 1998).
14. Donnelly J., Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice , 3 rd edn. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013).
15. Eichler M., Family Shifts: Families, Policies and Gender Equality (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1997).
16. Esping-Andersen G., The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (London: Polity Press, 1990).
17. Eydal G. B., and Satka M., “"Social Work and Nordic Welfare Policies for Children – Present Challenges in the Light of the Past"”, European Journal of Social Work , Vol 9 (3) (2006): 305322.
18. Gilbert N. (ed.), Combatting Child Abuse: International Perspectives and Trends (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).
19. Gilbert N.,, Parton N., and Skivenes M. (eds.), Child Protection Systems: International Trends and Orientations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).
20. Goodyer A., Child-Centred Foster Care: A Rights-Based Model for Practice (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2011).
21. Gornick J., and Meyers M., “"Creating Gender Egalitarian Societies: An Agenda for Reform”", Politics and Society , Vol 36 (3) (2008): 313349.
22. Hammarberg T., “"The un Convention on the Rights of the Child – and How to Make It Work"”, Human Rights Quarterly , Vol 12 (1990): 97105.
23. Hetherington R.,, Cooper A.,, Smith P., and Wilford G., Protecting Children: Messages from Europe (Dorset: Russell House Publishing Limited, 1997).
24. Hetherington R.,, “"Learning from Difference: Comparing Child Welfare Systems"” in Freymond N., and Cameron G., Towards Positive Systems of Child and Family Welfare (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006): 2750.
25. Hetherington R., and Nurse T., “"Promoting Change from ‘Child Protection’ to ‘Child and Family Welfare’: The Problems of the English System"” in Freymond, N. and Cameron, G., Towards Positive Systems of Child and Family Welfare (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006): 5383.
26. Howe R. B., “"Implementing Children’s Rights in a Federal State: The Case of Canada’s Child Protection System”", International Journal of Children’s Rights , Vol 9 (2001): 361382.
27. Howe R. B., and Covell K. (eds.), Children’s Rights in Canada: A Question of Commitment (Waterloo, on: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2007).
28. Kufeldt K.,, “"Inclusive Foster Care: Implementation of The Model"” in McKenzie B., Current Perspectives on Foster Family Care for Children and Youth (Toronto: Wall and Emerson, 1994): 84100.
29. Leira A., “"Updating the ‘Gender Contract’? Childcare Reforms in the Nordic Countries in the 1990s"”, nora , Vol 2 (10) (2002): 8189.
30. Macpherson C. B., The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).
31. McDougall D., “"Children’s Rights: An Evaluation of the Controversy"” in Levitt, K. and Wharf, B., The Challenge of Child Welfare (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1985): 266275.
32. Morgan K., “"The Political Path to a Dual Earner/Dual Carer Society: Pitfalls and Possibilities"”, Politics and Society ,Vol 36 (3) (2008): 403420.
33. oecd , Society at a Glance 2011: oecd Social Indicators (Paris: oecd Publishing, 2011).
34. Pateman C., The Disorder of Women (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989).
35. Ploug N,. “"The Nordic Child Care Regime – History, Development and Challenges"”, Children and Youth Services Review , Vol 34 (2012): 517522.
36. Rawls J., A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971).
37. Shestack J. J., “"The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights”", Human Rights Quarterly Vol 20 (1998): 201234.
38. Skevik A.,, “"The State – Parent – Child Relationship After Family Break-Ups: Child Maintenance in Norway and Britain"” in Flora P. et al. (eds.), The State of Social Welfare (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998).
39. Skevik A., “"Children of the Welfare State: Individuals with Entitlements, or Hidden in the Family?" ”, Journal of Social Policy , Vol 32 (3) (2003): 423440.
40. Spitz D. (ed.), On Liberty: John Stuart Mill . A Norton Critical Edition (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1975).
41. Strong-Boag V., “"Getting to Now: Children in Distress in Canada’s Past"” in Wharf, B., Community Work Approaches to Child Welfare (Peterborough, Broadview Press, 2002): 2946.
42. Twining W. (ed.), Human Rights, Southern Voices: Francis Deng, Abdullahi An-Na’im, Yash Ghai and Upendra Baxi (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
43. unicef , Convention on the Rights of the Child – Frequently Asked Questions (2005): .
44. unicef Office of Research, “"Child Well-being in Rich Countries: A Comparative Overview"”, Innocenti Report Card 11 (Florence: unicef Office of Research, 2013).
45. United Nations General Assembly, u.n. Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989), Document: a/res/44/25.
46. United Nations General Assembly, Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children (2010), Document: a/res/64/142.
47. United Nations Treaty Collection, Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989): .
48. Waldock T.,, “"The Rights of Children in Care: Consistency With the Convention?”" in Howe R. B., and Covell K. (eds.), Children’s Rights in Canada: A Question of Commitment (Waterloo, on: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2007): 287319.
49. Waldock T., “"Enhancing the Quality of Care in Child Welfare: Our Obligation under the un Convention on the Rights of the Child”", Relational Child and Youth Care Practice , Vol 24 (3) (2011): 5061.
50. Waldock T., “"Apologize … For Goodness Sake: Canada’s ‘Home Children’ and Our History of Discrimination Against Marginalised Children"”, Relational Child and Youth Care Practice , Vol 25 (2) (2012): 6975.
51. Young S.,, McKenzie M.,, Schjelderup L.,, More C., and Walker S., “"What Can We Do to Bring the Sparkle Back into this Child’s Eyes? Child Rights/Community Development Principles: Key Elements for a Strengths-based Child Protection Practice"”. Child Care in Practice , Vol 20 (1) (2014): 135152.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02401007
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02401007
2016-07-23
2017-10-22

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    The International Journal of Children's Rights — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation