Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Children’s Participation Rights in Film Classification Systems

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Film classification helps countries meet their obligations to protect children under Article 17(e) of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Classifying films is an administrative proceeding that affects children, by limiting and setting conditions on what they can view. Therefore, children should have their interests represented or otherwise participate, as required by Article 12. This paper researches the degrees and methods of child participation in film classification systems, primarily by a survey of agencies. Based on data from 22 agencies in 17 countries, 73 per cent have some degree of child participation. This ranges from providing a website for children, to children’s panels reviewing and discussing classification for pre-screened films. Comparison with other international data sets suggests countries with a high degree of child participation in film classification are those which are generally making good progress implementing children’s rights.

Affiliations: 1: Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, timothy.covell@carleton.ca

10.1163/15718182-02502005
/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02502005
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02502005
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Biltereyst D.,, “"Film Censorship in a Liberal Free Market Democracy: Strategies of Film Control and Audiences’ Experiences of Censorship in Belgium"” in Biltereyst D., and Vande Winkel R. (eds.), Silencing Cinema: Film Censorship around the World (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).
2. Blakey S., Rated Argyle (Vancouver: Consumer Protection bc, 2010): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2MfrVwqVL0.
3. Brand J., A Comparative Analysis of Ratings, Classification and Censorship in Selected Countries around the World (Australia: Centre for New Media Research and Education, Bond University, 2002): http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1886&context=hss_pubs.
4. Büttner C., “"The Protection of Minors Against Harmful Media Content in Europe: How European Film Classifiers View Childhood and Adolescence"”, Nordicom Review 2005, no. 1 (Vol 2005): 12130.
5. Covell K.,, and Howe R.B., The Challenge of Children’s Rights for Canada (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2006).
6. Covell K.,, Howe R.B.,, and Blokhuis J.C., The Challenge of Children’s Rights for Canada , 2nd edn. (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, forthcoming).
7. Covell T., Film Classification in Canada and the United States: The Freedom of Government Control? Master’s thesis (Ottawa: Carleton University, 2015): https://curve.carleton.ca/ff904586-bd5a-4a56-acf3-a7eb515a76f2.
8. Dean M., Censored! Only in Canada: The History of Film Censorship – The Scandal Off the Screen (Toronto: Virgo, 1981).
9. Ford C., No Guidance (Toronto: Ontario College of Art and Design, 2009): https://youtu.be/LoZ-W4qwG48.
10. Gayle D., “"uk to Censor Online Videos of ‘Non-Conventional’ Sex Acts"”, The Guardian 23 November 2016: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/23/censor-non-conventional-sex-acts-online-internet-pornography.
11. Healy W., The Individual Delinquent: A Text-book of Diagnosis and Prognosis for All Concerned in Understanding Offenders (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1915).
12. Leone R.,, and Barowski L., “"mpaa Ratings Creep"”, Journal of Children and Media Vol 5, no. 1 (1 February 2011): 5368.
13. Leone R.,, and Houle N., “"21st Century Ratings Creep: pg-13 and R"”, Communication Research Reports Vol 23, no. 1 (1 June 2006): 5361.
14. Loiperdinger M.,, “"Film Censorship in Germany: Continuity and Change through Five Political Systems"” in Biltereyst D., and Vande Winkel R. (eds.), Silencing Cinema: Film Censorship around the World (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).
15. Lundy L.,, Kilkelly U.,, Byrne B.,, and Kang J., The un Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Study of Legal Implementation in 12 Countries (London: unicef-uk, 2012): https://www.unicef.org.uk/publications/child-rights-convention-2012-report/.
16. Munro E.R.,, Pinkerton J.,, Mendes P.,, Hyde-Dryden G.,, Herczog M.,, and Benbenishty R., “"The Contribution of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child to Understanding and Promoting the Interests of Young People Making the Transition from Care to Adulthood"”, Children and Youth Services Review Vol 33, no. 12 (December 2011): 241723. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.025
17. New Zealand Office of Film and Literature Classification, “"Our Video Public Service Announcements"”, New Zealand Office of Film and Literature Classification News (Wellington: oflc, 2014): http://www.classificationoffice.govt.nz/news/latest-news/our-video-psas.html.
18. Sklar R., Movie-Made America: A Cultural History of American Movies , rev. edition (New York: Vintage, 1994).
19. Talbot H., Comparing Classifications: Feature Films and Video Games 2012 & 2013 (Wellington: Information Unit at the Office of Film and Literature Classification, 2014): http://www.classificationoffice.govt.nz.
20. Thompson K.M., and Yokota F., “"Violence, Sex, and Profanity in Films: Correlation of Movie Ratings With Content"”, Medscape General Medicine Vol 6, no. 3 (12 July 2004): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1435631/.
21. Tropiano S., Obscene, Indecent, Immoral & Offensive: 100+ Years of Censored, Banned, and Controversial Films (New York: Limelight Editions, 2009).
22. Waguespack D.M., and Sorenson O., “"The Ratings Game: Asymmetry in Classification"”, Organization Science Vol 22, no. 3 (1 June 2011): 54153. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0533. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0533
23. Walsh D.A., and Gentile D.A., “"A Validity Test of Movie, Television, and Video-Game Ratings"”, Pediatrics Vol 107, no. 6 (1 June 2001): 13028. doi:10.1542/peds.107.6.1302. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.6.1302
24. Ward K., and Talbot H., Comparing Classifications: Feature Films and Video Games 2010 & 2011 (Wellington: Information Unit at the Office of Film and Literature Classification, 2013): http://www.classificationoffice.govt.nz.
25. Wilson B.J.,, Linz D.,, and Randall B., “"Applying Social Science Research to Film Ratings: A Shift from Offensiveness to Harmful Effects"”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media Vol 34, no. 4 (1 September 1990): 44368. doi:10.1080/08838159009386754. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159009386754
26. Wise W., “"History of Ontario’s Film Industry, 1896 to 1985"”, Take One 22 June 2000: http://www.thefreelibrary.com/History+of+Ontario per cent27s+film+industry per cent2c+1896+to+1985.-a030574580.
27. Young D., Motion Pictures; a Study in Social Legislation (Philadelphia: Westbrook, 1922): http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001437898.
28. United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (a), Summary Record of the 660th Meeting – Initial report of the Marshall Islands (United Nations crc/C/sr.660 30 November 2000 ge.00-44726 (E), 29 September 2000): http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CRC per cent2fC per cent2fSR.660&Lang=en.
29. United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (b), Periodic reports of States parties due in 1998 – Addendum – Denmark (United Nations CRC/C/70/Add.6 31 March 2000 GE.00-41239 (E), 15 September 1998): http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CRC per cent2fC per cent2f70 per cent2fAdd.6&Lang=en.
30. United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, Third and fourth periodic reports of States Parties due in 2007 – France (United Nations crc/C/fra/4 21 February 2008 ge.08-40766 (ext), 11 September 2007): http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CRC per cent2fC per cent2fFRA per cent2f4&Lang=en.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02502005
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02502005
2017-08-08
2017-09-23

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    The International Journal of Children's Rights — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation