Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Teaching and Learning Traditions in Children’s Human Rights

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Curriculum Emphases in Theory and Practice

The aim of this paper is to develop educational theoretical concepts for analyses and descriptions of the teaching and learning traditions in children’s human rights and to illustrate its diversity. The paper suggests viewing human rights as a subject field for research and education and using curriculum theory – particularly the concept of curriculum emphases – as a tool for the analyses. Drawing on the results of a previous international study (Brantefors and Quennerstedt, 2016), four teaching and learning traditions of rights are identified: (1) the participation emphasis; (2) the empowerment emphasis; (3) the awareness of rights emphasis; and (4) the right respecting emphasis. With the curriculum emphases concept it is possible to define the main motives for teaching and learning, and also to see what is emphasised in education. In the last section, the traditions are applied and tested on empirical examples. The conclusion is that the emphases concept is a fruitful analytical instrument that makes the different traditions of the teaching and learning of children’s human rights visible.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Education, Uppsala University, Sweden, lotta.brantefors@edu.uu.se ; 2: Department of Educational studies, Karlstad University, Sweden, nina.thelander@kau.se

10.1163/15718182-02502009
/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02502009
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02502009
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Brantefors L., & Quennerstedt A., “"Teaching and learning children’s human rights. A research synthesis”", Cogent Education 2016 (3), 1247610: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.12476.
2. Englund T., Curriculum as a political problem: changing educational conceptions, with special reference to citizenship education (Uppsala: Uppsala University, 1986).
3. Englund T.,, "“Undervisning som meningserbjudande” [“Teaching and learning as offering of meaning”]", in Uljens M. (ed.), Didaktik – teori, reflektion och praktik [Didactics – theory, reflection and practice] (Lund: Studentlitteratur 1997).
4. Englund T., “"Om relevansen av begreppet didaktik” [“On the relevance of the concept of Didaktik”]", Acta Didactica Norge 2007 (Vol 1(1)), 112.
5. Goodson I.F., School subjects and curriculum change (London: Falmer 1987).
6. Gundem B.B., Europeisk didaktikk: tenkning og viten [European didactics: imagination and knowing] (Oslo: Universitetsforl. 2011).
7. I’Anson J., Educational research as counterpoint: Reflections on the uncrc at 25 (Paper presented in ecer, Porto, Portugal, 2014).
8. Östman L., Socialisation och mening: No-utbildning som politiskt och miljömoraliskt problem [Socialisation and meaning: Science education as political and environmental and moral problem] (Uppsala: Uppsala University 1995).
9. Philips L.,, Quennerstedt A.,, Robinson C., The Refraction of Children’s and Young People’s Human Rights in National Curricula in Australia, England and Sweden (Paper presented in ecer, Porto, Portugal, 2014).
10. Pinar W., Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists (Berkeley: Mc Cutchan 1975).
11. Quennerstedt A., “"The construction of children’s rights in education – a research synthesis"”, International Journal of Children’s Rights 2011 (Vol 19), 661678.
12. Quennerstedt A., and Quennerstedt M., “"Researching children’s rights in education: Sociology of childhood encountering educational theory"”, British Journal of Sociology of Education 2014, (Vol 35 (1)), 115132.
13. Reynaert D.,, Bouverne-De Bie M., and Vandevelde S., “"A Review of Children’s Rights Literature Since the Adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”", Childhood 2009 (Vol 16(4)), 518534.
14. Roberts D., “"Developing the concept of ‘curriculum emphases’ in science education”", Science Education 1982 (Vol 62(2)), 243260.
15. Roberts D., and Östman L., Problems of meaning in science curriculum (New York and London: Teachers Collage Press 1998).
16. Schüllerqvist B.,, “"Ämnesdidaktisk lärarforskning – ett angeläget forsknigsfält” [“Teacher research on subject didactics – an important field of research”]", in Schüllerqvist B., & Osbeck C. (eds.), Ämnesdidaktiska insikter och strategier [Insights and strategies in subject didactics] (Karlstad: Karlstad University Press 2009).
17. Swedish National Agency for Education, Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre (Lgr 11) (Stockholm: Ministry of Education in Sweden 2011).
18. Thelander N., We are all the same, but … Kenyan and Swedish school children’s views on children’s rights (Karlstad: Karlstad University 2009).
19. Thelander N.,, “"Human Rights Education: teaching children’s human rights–a matter of why, what and how"” in Gillett-Swan J., and Coppock V. (eds.), Children’s Rights, Educational Research and the uncrc, past, present and future (Oxford. Symposium Books 2016).
20. United Nations, Convention on the Rights of the Child , General Assembly resolution 44/25, 20 Nov. 1989. u.n. Doc. a/res/44/25.
21. United Nations, un Committee on the Rights of the Child, General comment no. 1 on the aims of education , crc/gc/2001/1 (Geneva, United Nations 2001).
22. un; unesco and Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Plan of Action,. World Programme for Human Rights Education. First Phase (New York/Geneve, 2006).
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02502009
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15718182-02502009
2017-08-08
2017-11-20

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    The International Journal of Children's Rights — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation