Cookies Policy
Cookie Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Once more: debet or debetur in Gai 4,73?

MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

$30.00+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

Contrary to the manuscript tradition, the active form debet in Gai. 4,73 is to be read as the passive debetur. Against the background of semantic and syntactic analysis, this passage makes sense only under the assumption of a corrupted abbreviation (as can frequently be found in the Veronese Codex). For only then is the passage coherent and in conformity with parallel juridical sources. Considerations as to a Roman double entry booking based on the active debet are faced with objections in the sources everywhere.


Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Create email alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review — Recommend this title to your library

    Thank you

    Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation