Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Towards a Contemporary View of Islamic Criminal Procedures: A Focus on the Testimony of Witnesses

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Arab Law Quarterly

This paper challenges the traditional conception of Islamic criminal law and provides alternatives to the rules of criminal procedures that are both compatible with modern life and the sprit of Shari'ah. The first part of the article provides a brief explanation of the four main sources of Islamic law. The second part focuses on the different classifications of crimes in Islamic law and explains Shari'ah's classical rules of evidence. It gives answers to some complicated legal questions by examining the law's underlying rationales. For example, the author challenges the conservative view that calls for the imposition of the death penalty onto apostates and clarifies that such punishment has no foundation in Shari'ah. He also explains why, from an evidentiary standpoint, the crime of rape should be qualified as haraba as opposed to zina, which both entails a harsher penalty for the perpetrator and more lenient evidentiary requirements from prosecutors. Finally, the author contests the traditional stream of Islamic thinking by arguing that in criminal matters, the testimony of female witnesses should be equal to that of males and that in hudūd crimes, scientific evidence should be given the same status as the testimony of eye witnesses.

Affiliations: 1: Human Rights Lawyer, Cairo, Egypt;, Email: tarek.badawy@mail.mcgill.ca

10.1163/157302509X454717
/content/journals/10.1163/157302509x454717
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/157302509x454717
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/157302509x454717
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/157302509x454717
2009-07-01
2016-12-11

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Arab Law Quarterly — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation