Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

To Claim Damages for Wrongful Attachment, the Plaintiffs Must Prove Bad Intention and That the Damages Were Intended

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the Brill platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Arab Law Quarterly

In an action filed before the Dubai Court, where the plaintiffs claimed damages for wrongful attachment, the court held that the plaintiffs are not entitled to claim damages as the plaintiffs who had brought action against them in the main action and obtained an order for an attachment against the plaintiffs assets did not intend to cause damages. The court held that litigation and using the court process is a right granted to all persons and the plaintiff to such an action will not be liable to pay damages if he uses his rights as any other average person according to the law. However, if the plaintiff intended damages or seeks illegal benefits out of the proceedings, damages will be awarded. Otherwise damages will not be awarded when a person is seeking legal protection under the law, even if his action caused damage to other persons.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation