Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Suretyship in German and Polish Law: A Comparative Analysis

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Review of Central and East European Law
For more content, see Review of Socialist Law.

This paper analyzes the institution of suretyship in the German and Polish legal systems. It highlights both differences and similarities of the main characteristics, such as conditions to validity, scope of liability, defences available to the surety and the recourse by the surety in case of payment. The analysis is based not only on the relevant legal provisions, jurisprudence and doctrine, but also on their application in the business practice of the two countries.

The comparative overview of the suretyship permits the conclusion that both legal systems regulate the principal features of this institution rather similarly. However, there are also a number of significant differences. Notably, German jurisprudence and doctrine appear to adopt a more flexible approach to this institution than the prevailing position in Polish law. On the other hand, the liability of the surety is more rigorously shaped under Polish law. Whereas German law and practice seem in many respects to be more protective of the surety than Polish law and jurisprudence, the latter provides the surety with far less possibilities to be released from the assumed liability.

10.1163/157303506X129422
/content/journals/10.1163/157303506x129422
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/157303506x129422
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/157303506x129422
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/157303506x129422
2006-07-01
2016-12-04

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Review of Central and East European Law — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation