Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Two Defining Features of Russian Tort Law: Their Rationale and Legal Effect

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Review of Central and East European Law
For more content, see Review of Socialist Law.

There are two aspects of Russian tort law that set it apart from that of other countries: the recognition of a general reversal of the burden of proof regarding fault in delictual obligations, and the existence of a general clause of strict liability. Such features are not only unique to Russian law but, also, constitute the very core of tort law in Russia today.Despite the significance of these two features, this is a gravely understudied area of research. One of the main reasons for this lies in the lack of interest in (and access to) Soviet legal literature and case law. However, without examining such sources, it is impossible to grasp the rationale behind such atypical legislation, which in turn, makes it difficult to understand Russian tort law in general. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the legislative history of Russia’s past era.Equally important is the legal effect that features may have in modern Russian tort law. This article will focus on the impact that a general reversal of the burden of proof has had on the outcome of tort cases in Russia. The author also will compare the general clause of strict liability in the Russian Civil Code with the regulation of sources of heightened danger in selected countries, a topic that deserves special attention, given Russia’s extensive experience in the field. In addition, all these questions will be examined against the backdrop of other contemporary jurisdictions and European harmonization initiatives in the area of tort law.

Affiliations: 1: Research Professor, Korea University, Office of Research Affairs, Lecturer, Korea University, School of Law, Seoul, Korea

10.1163/15730352-00000015
/content/journals/10.1163/15730352-00000015
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15730352-00000015
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15730352-00000015
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15730352-00000015
2014-08-20
2017-09-21

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Review of Central and East European Law — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation