Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Geometrization of Motion: Galileo’s Triangle of Speed and its Various Transformations

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Early Science and Medicine

This article analyzes Galileo’s mathematization of motion, focusing in particular on his use of geometrical diagrams. It argues that Galileo regarded his diagrams of acceleration not just as a complement to his mathematical demonstrations, but as a powerful heuristic tool. Galileo probably abandoned the wrong assumption of the proportionality between the degree of velocity and the space traversed in accelerated motion when he realized that it was impossible, on the basis of that hypothesis, to build a diagram of the law of fall. The article also shows how Galileo’s discussion of the paradoxes of infinity in the First Day of the Two New Sciences is meant to provide a visual solution to problems linked to the theory of acceleration presented in Day Three of the work. Finally, it explores the reasons why Cavalieri and Gassendi, although endorsing Galileo’s law of free fall, replaced Galileo’s diagrams of acceleration with alternative ones.

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/157338210x516279
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 03080188 2004; Vol 29: 259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/030801804225018873
2. british journal for the history of science. 00070874 1969; Vol 4: 340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400010244
3. Physis, 01037331 1974; Vol 16: 309
4. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 00039519 1974; Vol 13: 103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00327483
5. Early Science and Medicine 13837427 1999; Vol 4: 269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157338299X00076
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/157338210x516279
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/157338210x516279
2010-01-01
2016-12-04

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Early Science and Medicine — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation