Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Les débats sur les fondements de la perspective linéaire de Piero della Francesca à Egnatio Danti: un cas de mathématisation à rebours

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

In the Quattrocento and Cinquecento the rise of linear perspective caused many polemics which opposed the supporters of an artificial geometrisation of sight to those who were praising the qualities of the drawing according to nature, or were invoking some arguments on a physiological basis. These debates can be grouped according to the four alternatives that form their central concerns: restricted vs. broad field of vision; ocular immobility vs. mobility; curvilinear vs. planar picture; monocular vs. binocular vision. By retaining the first terms of these four alternatives, the history of perspective eliminated many heterodox constructions. From the viewpoint of mathematisation the interest of these debates is that they succeeded, rather than preceded, the adoption of a perspective system defined by the intersection of the visual pyramid. Thus the history of linear perspective constitutes a genuine case of a posteriori justification, or, put differently, it gives us a case of upside down mathematisation.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 09574239 2003; Vol 13: 101
2. Proceedings of the British Academy 00681202 1984; Vol 70: 89
3. Renaissance Studies 02691213 1997; Vol 11: 61
4. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 00754390 1986; Vol 49: 66
5. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 00754390 1986; Vol 49: 150
6. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 00393681 1987; Vol 18: 1
7. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 00754390 1988; Vol 51: 190
8. Archives d'Ophtalmologie 03994236 1971; Vol 31: 189
9. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 09574239 2003; Vol 13: 79
10. Janus 00214264 1958; Vol 47: 79
11. Physis 01037331 1976; Vol 18: 117
12. Centaurus 00088994 1991; Vol 34: 44

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Early Science and Medicine — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation