Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Full Access 'Still Arguing Over Cost': Bargaining, Etiquette and the Modern Patient in Republican Beijing

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

'Still Arguing Over Cost': Bargaining, Etiquette and the Modern Patient in Republican Beijing

  • PDF
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Asian Medicine

In this article I have endeavoured to show how conflicting notions of consumer etiquette and patient behaviour played out during negotiations between social workers and patients at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMC) in the 1930s. Organisational technologies such as quantification, record keeping, statistics, standardisation and systematisation were essential aspects of the American-style scientific medicine that PUMC aimed to introduce to China in the Republican period. Chinese patients brought assumptions of their own to the American hospital, however. Wealthy women in particular insistently bargained over the price of treatment, thereby adopting a selective approach to hospital therapies. In response, hospital social workers, who were allowed considerable flexibility about the manner of negotiating prices, adapted payment customs to satisfy this class of patients. At the same time, social workers wielded their control over resources with an eye toward disciplining patients in various ways. They investigated patients' financial circumstances, gathering evidence in order to compel more truthful self-disclosure, or a posture of deference toward scientific and institutional authority. In Republican Beijing a 'modern' Chinese patient role thus evolved through a process of mutual, if asymmetrical, negotiation. Themes that become visible in the process of negotiating payment are suggestive of ways PUMC, as a model of administrative modernity and scientific organisation, was both linked to—and diverged from—consumer practices and concepts of distributive justice rooted in a distant society.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation