Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Are all the commentaries on Matthew really necessary?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

$30.00+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Religion and Theology

In this article three new commentaries on Matthew are discussed, namely Blomberg (1992), Hagner (1993), and Luck (1993). Different sections from the three commentaries are compared: first the Introduction, and then the commentary on two pericopes, namely Matthew 1:18-23 and Matthew 8:23-27. From the comparison a few conclusions are drawn and the necessity of the abundance of Matthean commentaries since the previous decade is questioned.


Article metrics loading...


Affiliations: 1: Department of New Testament University of South Africa PO Box 392 Pretoria 0001 Republic of South Africa


Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to email alerts
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Religion and Theology — Recommend this title to your library

    Thank you

    Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation