Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Ghana Trips Over the TRIPS Agreement on Plant Breeders’ Rights

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of African Journal of Legal Studies

The premise under which the global Intellectual Property Right (IPR) system is validated has often focused on a traditional materialistic approach. While this seems to find legitimate support in economic reasoning, such a fundamental view also appears to contradict a related social norm claim, which dictates that society ought to be shaped by appropriate values rather than economic rubrics. Although Ghana is not a signatory member of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants Convention (UPOV Convention), there is explicit evidence that the Plant Breeders’ Rights (PBRs) Bill under consideration in the Ghanaian Parliament contains provisions modelled on the UPOV Act 1991 rather than the potentially flexible and effective sui generis system in TRIPS. This paper aims to contribute to a recently active area of discussion on the topic by examining the consequences of stringent legislation on PBRs in the absence of adequate safeguard measures to protect the public interest. Consequently, the hypothesis of this paper rests on the argument that every system needs checks and balances and the legislative system is no exception. The conclusion is that Ghana should not ignore the effective sui generis system under TRIPS for the PBRs modelled around the UPOV Convention because the latter does not entail adequate safeguard provisions and stands to devalue the public interest.

Affiliations: 1: Centre for Commercial Law StudiesQueen Mary University of London t.manu@herts.ac.uk

10.1163/17087384-12342070
/content/journals/10.1163/17087384-12342070
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/17087384-12342070
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/17087384-12342070
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/17087384-12342070
2017-06-29
2017-11-21

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    African Journal of Legal Studies — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation