Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Matthew as Performer, Tradent, Scribe

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

A Review of Alan Kirk’s Q in Matthew

image of Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus

This is a review essay of Alan Kirk’s LNTS monograph, Q in Matthew: Ancient Media, Memory, and Early Scribal Transmission of the Jesus Tradition (Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2016).

Affiliations: 1: Johnson University, School of Bible and Theology, 7900 Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37998, USA, RRodriguez@JohnsonU.edu

10.1163/17455197-01502003
/content/journals/10.1163/17455197-01502003
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/17455197-01502003
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Eve Eric,. “"Reconstructing Mark: A Thought Experiment".” Pages 89114 in Questioning Q: A Multidimensional Critique . Edited by Goodacre Mark, and Perrin Nicholas. Downers Grove, il: ivp Academic, 2004.
2. Foley John Miles. The Theory of Oral Composition: History and Methodology . Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988.
3. Goodacre Mark,. “"Taking Our Leave of Mark-Q Overlaps: Major Agreements and the Farrer Theory".” Gospel Interpretation and the Q Hypothesis . Edited by Müller Mogens, and Omerzu Heike. lnts 573. London: T&T Clark, forthcoming.
4. Goodacre Mark. The Case Against Q: Studies in Markan Priority and the Synoptic Problem . Harrisburg, pa: Trinity Press International, 2002.
5. Goodacre Mark,, and Perrin Nicholas, eds. Questioning Q: A Multidimensional Critique . Downers Grove, il: ivp Academic, 2004.
6. Hurtado Larry W. “"Oral Fixation and New Testament Studies? ‘Orality’, ‘Performance’ and Reading Texts in Early Christianity".” nts Vol 60 (2014): 32140.
7. Hurtado Larry W. The Earliest Christian Artifacts: Manuscripts and Christian Origins . Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006.
8. Iverson Kelly R. “"Oral Fixation or Oral Corrective? A Response to Larry Hurtado".” nts Vol 62 (2016): 183200.
9. Kelber Werner H. The Oral and the Written Gospel: The Hermeneutics of Speaking and Writing in the Synoptic Tradition, Mark, Paul, and Q . Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983.
10. Kirk Alan. Q in Matthew: Ancient Media, Memory, and Early Scribal Transmission of the Jesus Tradition. lnts 564. London: T&T Clark, 2016.
11. Kirk Alan,. “"Social and Cultural Memory".” Pages 124 in Memory, Tradition, and Text: Uses of the Past in Early Christianity . Edited by Kirk Alan, and Thatcher Tom. SemeiaSt 52. Atlanta: sbl Press, 2005.
12. Kirk Alan,. “"The Johannine Jesus in the Gospel of Peter: A Social Memory Approach".” Pages 31321 in Jesus in Johannine Tradition . Edited by Fortna Robert T., and Thatcher Tom. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001.
13. Kirk Alan,, and Thatcher Tom, eds. Memory, Tradition, and Text: Uses of the Past in Early Christianity . SemeiaSt 52. Atlanta: sbl Press, 2005.
14. Lord Albert B,. “"The Gospels as Oral Traditional Literature".” Pages 3391 in The Relationships Among the Gospels: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue . Edited by Walker William O.Jr. San Antonio, tx: Trinity University Press, 1978.
15. Lord Albert B. The Singer of Tales . Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.
16. Poirier John C.,, and Peterson Jeffrey, eds. Marcan Priority Without Q: Explorations in the Farrer Hypothesis . lnts 455. London: T&T Clark, 2015.
17. Robinson James M.,, Hoffmann Paul,, and Kloppenborg John S., eds. The Critical Edition of Q . Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2000.
18. Rodríguez Rafael. Oral Tradition and the New Testament: A Guide for the Perplexed . London: T&T Clark, 2014.
19. Rodríguez Rafael. Structuring Early Christian Memory: Jesus in Tradition, Performance, and Text . "European Studies on Christian Origins, lnts 407". London: T&T Clark, 2010.
20. Sanders E.P. “"The Overlaps of Mark and Q and the Synoptic Problem".” nts Vol 19 (1973): 45365.
21. Schwartz Barry. Abraham Lincoln and the Forge of National Memory . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
22. Schwartz Barry. Abraham Lincoln in the Post-Heroic Era: History and Memory in Late Twentieth-Century America . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
23. Stock Ann-Kathrin,, Gajsar Hannah,, and Güntürkün Onur,. “"The Neuroscience of Memory".” Pages 36991 in Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity . Edited by Galinsky Karl. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
24. Talbert Charles H,. “"Oral and Independent or Literary and Interdependent? A Response to Albert B. Lord".” Pages 93102 in The Relationships Among the Gospels: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue . Edited by Walker William O.Jr. San Antonio, tx: Trinity University Press, 1978.
25. Weaks Joseph A. “"Mark without Mark: Problematizing the Reliability of a Reconstructed Text of Q".” PhD dissertation, Brite Divinity School, 2010.
26. Weissenrieder Annette,, and Coote Robert B., eds. The Interface of Orality and Writing: Speaking, Seeing, Writing in the Shaping of New Genres . wunt 260 . Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.
27. Zerubavel Eviatar. Time Maps: Collective Memory and the Social Shape of the Past . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
28. Zumthor Paul,. “"Body and Performance".” Pages 21726 in Materialities of Communication . Edited by Gumbrecht Hans Ulrich, and Ludwig Pfeiffer K.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994.
29. Zumthor Paul,. Oral Poetry: An Introduction . Translated by Murphy-Judy Kathryn. "Theory and History of Literature 70". Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1990.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/17455197-01502003
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/17455197-01502003
2017-12-11
2018-06-20

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation