Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Full Access Intentions and Discrimination in Hiring

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Intentions and Discrimination in Hiring

  • PDF
  • HTML
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Moral Philosophy

Fundamentally, intentions do not matter to the permissibility of actions, according to Thomas Scanlon (among others). Yet, discriminatory intentions seem essential to certain kinds of direct discrimination in hiring and firing, and appear to be something by virtue of which, in part at least, these kinds of discrimination are morally impermissible. Scanlon's account of the wrongness of discrimination attempts to accommodate this appearance through the notion of the expressive meaning of discriminatory acts and a certain view about how permissibility relates to the meaning of actions. This paper explores the scope, strengths and weaknesses of this account. Specifically, it challenges the view that discrimination reflecting hierarchical value judgments necessarily involves a wrong that renders such discrimination more objectionable than other forms.

Affiliations: 1: Institut for Statskundskab, Aarhus University Bartholins Allé 7, bygning 1332, lokale 118, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark

10.1163/174552411X612065
/content/journals/10.1163/174552411x612065
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading

Fundamentally, intentions do not matter to the permissibility of actions, according to Thomas Scanlon (among others). Yet, discriminatory intentions seem essential to certain kinds of direct discrimination in hiring and firing, and appear to be something by virtue of which, in part at least, these kinds of discrimination are morally impermissible. Scanlon's account of the wrongness of discrimination attempts to accommodate this appearance through the notion of the expressive meaning of discriminatory acts and a certain view about how permissibility relates to the meaning of actions. This paper explores the scope, strengths and weaknesses of this account. Specifically, it challenges the view that discrimination reflecting hierarchical value judgments necessarily involves a wrong that renders such discrimination more objectionable than other forms.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/17455243/9/1/17455243_009_01_S05_text.html;jsessionid=1PuVuZ2mXUIvwnf9JM7VErCw.x-brill-live-02?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/174552411x612065&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/174552411x612065
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/174552411x612065
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/174552411x612065
2012-01-01
2016-12-11

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation