Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Thickness and Evaluation

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Moral Philosophy

This is a review essay devoted to Pekka Väyrynen’s The Rude, the Lewd and the Nasty. Väyrynen’s book, concerned with thick terms and thick concepts, argues for a pragmatic view on the evaluativeness associated with these terms and concepts. The essay raises a number of critical questions regarding what Väyrynen’s arguments for his view actually show. It deals with, for example, thick properties, the fact-value distinction, what it is for terms and concepts to be (semantically) evaluative, and whether Väyrynen’s arguments generalize to thin evaluative concepts.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University,


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Alfano Mark, and Loeb Don: 2014, “Experimental Moral Philosophy”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . .
2. Anscombe Elizabeth: 1958, “"Modern Moral Philosophy"”, Philosophy Vol 33: 119.
3. Bedke Matt: 2014, “"Review of Pekka Väyrynen", The Lewd, the Rude and the Nasty”, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews .
4. Blackburn Simon: 1992, “"Through Thick and Thin"”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society , Suppl. Vol. Vol 66: 28499.
5. Brink David: 1989, Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Dancy Jonathan: 1993, Moral Reasons , Blackwell, Oxford.
7. Eklund Matti: 2011, “"What are Thick Concepts?”", Canadian Journal of Philosophy Vol 41: 2549.
8. Eklund Matti: 2013, “"Evaluative Language and Evaluative Reality"”, in Kirchin (2013), pp. 16181.
9. Elstein Daniel, and Hurka Tom: 2009, “"From Thick to Thin: Two Moral Reduction Plans”", Canadian Journal of Philosophy Vol 39: 51536.
10. Foot Philippa: 1958, “"Moral Arguments”", Mind Vol 67: 50213.
11. Hurley Susan: 1989, Natural Reasons , Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Hursthouse Rosalind,: 1996, “"Normative Virtue Ethics”", in Crisp Roger (ed.), How Should One Live? , Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1936.
13. Kirchin Simon: 2010, “"The Shapelessness Hypothesis”", Philosophers’ Imprint Vol 10: 128.
14. Kirchin Simon (ed.): 2013, Thick Concepts , Oxford University Press, Oxford.
15. McNaughton David, and Rawling Piers,: 2000, “"Unprincipled Ethics”", in Hooker Brad, and Little Margaret (eds.), Moral Particularism , Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 25675.
16. Platts Mark: 1979, Ways of Meaning , Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
17. Putnam Hilary: 2002, The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays , Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
18. Roberts Debbie: 2011, “"Shapelessness and the Thick”", Ethics Vol 121: 489520.
19. Roberts Debbie: 2015, “"Review of Pekka Väyrynen", The Lewd, the Rude and the Nasty”, Ethics 125: 910–5.
20. Väyrynen Pekka: 2013, The Lewd, the Rude, and the Nasty , Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. Wiggins David: 1976, “A Sensible Subjectivism”, in Needs, Values, Truth , 3rd edn, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 185214.
22. Williams Bernard: 1985, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy , Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
23. Zangwill Nick: 2013, “"Moral Metaphor and Thick Concepts"”, in Kirchin (2013), pp. 197209.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Journal of Moral Philosophy — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation