Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Old Migrants, New Immigration and Anti-Chinese Discourse in Suriname

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Chinese Overseas

The highly visible Fuidung'on Hakka group has dominated the Surinamese retail sector as an urban trader minority for more than a century (since the days of indenture), and yet has never comprised more than two percent of the total Surinamese population of not quite half a million. Since the early 1990s, however, the worldwide trend of New Chinese Migrants/xin yimin has become plainly visible to the Surinamese public. Ethnic Chinese in Suriname are now no longer exclusively Hakka from the Fuidung'on region in Guangdong Province, but from almost every coastal region in the People's Republic, from Hainan to the Northeastern (Dongbei) Provinces. Despite a certain continuity, these latest migrants quickly have become controversial and Chinese are said to be flooding Suriname. The issue of “Chinesenes” has eventually become important enough to influence foreign policy, migration policy, citizenship discourse, and multiculturalist thinking. Chinese ethnic identity is renegotiated in the face of a growing anti-Chinese public discourse in which Chinese symbolize everything that is perceived as wrong about immigration and the Surinamese political system. The re-articulation of deep-seated anti-Chinese stereotypes might initially seem a response to immigration, but may also be primarily a form of popular dissatisfaction with or even resistance to the government. Chinese identity is renegotiated within Surinamese ethnic discourse; a category of “New Chinese” is added to the existing categories of assimilated Chinese (laiap) and established Fuidung'on Hakka migrants, while laiap Hakka redefine themselves as “real Chinese” in the local context i.e. Surinamese-Chinese.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Journal of Chinese Overseas — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation