Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Sir Hersch Lauterpacht’s Idea of State Sovereignty ‐ Is It Still Alive?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of International Community Law Review

This article explores Lauterpacht’s understanding of state sovereignty and its importance today. To this end, it presents intellectual roots of Lauterpacht’s legal thought that is both negative inspiration of his teaching (legal positivism) and the leading role in his work of Grotian and Victorian tradition embodying ideas of natural law, liberalism and progress, supported by Kelsen’s epistemology. Lauterpacht rejects legal positivism, which underlines a freedom of action of states, and, consequently, dependence of international law on state sovereignty. What he deems as relevant is the inverse dependence ‐ sovereignty stems from international law. The idea of sovereignty performs an important cognitive function by indicating the absence of legal interdependencies between states. Sovereignty is not an absolute, rigid category, but a bundle of rights conferred on states by international law. Such a nominalist approach to sovereignty is today noteworthy all the more because it counters mythology of state and its sovereignty. Yet, the more crucial aspect of Lauterpacht’s idea of sovereignty concerns the position of individuals. His view that human beings should be treated as ultimate subjects of law and that sovereignty means not only rights but also state responsibility is today strongly supported in academia and by some political initiatives.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Public International Law, UMCS Lublin Poland

10.1163/187197311X552901
/content/journals/10.1163/187197311x552901
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187197311x552901
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/187197311x552901
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187197311x552901
2011-01-01
2016-12-03

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    International Community Law Review — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation