Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Natural Resources in Situations of Armed Conflict: Is there a Coherent Framework for Protection?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

This article examines the legal regime regulating the protection of natural resources in situations of armed conflict. The first part considers the extent to which the enforceable content of jus in bello applies to natural resource use including environmental damage in armed conflict especially those of an internal character. The second part of the article examines the extent to which the concept of "permanent sovereignty" as a residual category, provides a yardstick against which resource exploitation is to be measured. It is argued that permanent sovereignty has a particular resonance beyond decolonization. It provides an international standard against which natural resource exploitation by all parties to a conflict stand to be assessed. The relevant of Security Council Resolutions in this area is also considered. These resolutions, although they have as their desiderata the maintenance of international peace and security, also play a secondary role in protecting and preserving natural resources in conflict zones. The main shortcomings of the existing legal framework is assessed and proposals for reform put forward.

Affiliations: 1: Queen Mary, University of London

10.1163/187197407X231235
/content/journals/10.1163/187197407x231235
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187197407x231235
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/187197407x231235
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187197407x231235
2007-10-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    International Community Law Review — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation