Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Full Access Hayden White’s “Theory of the Historical Work”: A Re-examination*

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Hayden White’s “Theory of the Historical Work”: A Re-examination*

  • HTML
  • PDF
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of the Philosophy of History

Abstract Hayden White’s Metahistory is best known for its “theory of tropes”; but Metahistory also put forward a distinct “theory of the historical work”, which has received rather less attention, and indeed has tended to be swallowed up by White’s tropology. This is a symptom of a wider problem, that the theory has been apprehended in paraphrase and synopsis rather than in the terms in which it was actually articulated. This paper seeks to redress these oversights through an exegetical analysis, embracing the structure of the theory, its rhetoric, and its relationship to the “theory of tropes”. The results bring several surprises, not the least of them being that Metahistory’s well-known relativism was accompanied by a hidden naïve realism; and it is shown that the book’s anti-epistemological stance was unfounded. Nevertheless some of the theory’s main concepts remain fertile, and even its limitations are instructive.

Affiliations: 1: University of Leeds a.f.wilson@leeds.ac.uk

10.1163/18722636-12341243
/content/journals/10.1163/18722636-12341243
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading

Abstract Hayden White’s Metahistory is best known for its “theory of tropes”; but Metahistory also put forward a distinct “theory of the historical work”, which has received rather less attention, and indeed has tended to be swallowed up by White’s tropology. This is a symptom of a wider problem, that the theory has been apprehended in paraphrase and synopsis rather than in the terms in which it was actually articulated. This paper seeks to redress these oversights through an exegetical analysis, embracing the structure of the theory, its rhetoric, and its relationship to the “theory of tropes”. The results bring several surprises, not the least of them being that Metahistory’s well-known relativism was accompanied by a hidden naïve realism; and it is shown that the book’s anti-epistemological stance was unfounded. Nevertheless some of the theory’s main concepts remain fertile, and even its limitations are instructive.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/18722636/7/1/18722636_007_01_S02_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/18722636-12341243&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/18722636-12341243
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18722636-12341243
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18722636-12341243
2013-01-01
2018-06-24

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation