Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Applying D. K. Lewis’s Counterfactual Theory of Causation to the Philosophy of Historiography

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of the Philosophy of History

A theory of causation suitable for historiography must accommodate the many types of causal claims historians make. In this paper, I examine the advantages of applying D. K. Lewis’s counterfactual theory of causation to the philosophy of historiography. I contend that Lewis’s possible world semantics offers a superior framework for making sense of historical causation, and that it lays the foundation for historians to look at history as causal series of events, remaining agnostic as to whether there may be historical regularities or laws. Lewis’s theory can also accommodate important notions often used by historians, such as absences as causes, historical necessity and contingency, and the role they play in the formulation of historical counterfactuals.

Affiliations: 1: The University of AucklandNew Zealand


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Atkinson R. F. Knowledge and Explanation in history: An Introduction to the Philosophy of History 1978 London Macmillan [Crossref]
2. Ben-Menahem Y."“Historical Contingency”" Ratio 1997Vol 10 99 107 [Crossref]
3. Bowie G. L."“The Similarity Approach to Counterfactuals: Some Problems”" Noûs 1979Vol 13 4 477 498 [Crossref]
4. Brien J."“The Role of Causation in History”" History in the Making 2013Vol 2 1 72 81
5. Elster J."“Counterfactuals and the New Economic History”" Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds 1978 Chichester Wiley 175 232
6. Fine K."“Critical notice: Counterfactuals”" Mind 1975Vol 84 451 458 [Crossref]
7. Funkhouser E."“Three Varieties of Causal Overdetermination”" Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 2002Vol 83 335 351 [Crossref]
8. Garrett B. What is this thing called metaphysics? 2011 New York Routledge 77 89
9. Hume D. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding 1777 London A. Millar [Crossref]
10. Illari P., Russo F. Causality: Philosophical Theory Meets Scientific Practice 2014 Oxford University Press
11. Lewis D. K. Counterfactuals 1973 Oxford Blackwell
12. Lewis D. K."“Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow”" Philosophical Papers 1986aVol Vol. II Oxford University Press 32 52
13. Lewis D. K."“Causation”" Philosophical Papers 1986bVol Vol. II Oxford University Press 159 213
14. Lewis D. K."“Causal Explanation”" Philosophical Papers 1986cVol Vol. II Oxford University Press 214 240
15. Lewis D. K."“Events”" Philosophical Papers 1986dVol Vol. II Oxford University Press 241 270
16. Lewis D. K."“Causation as Influence”" The Journal of Philosophy 2000Vol 97 4 182 197 [Crossref]
17. Lewis D. K. Collins J. , et al"“Void and Object”" Causation and Counterfactuals 2004a Cambridge (MA) MIT Press 277 290
18. Lewis D. K. Collins J. , et al"“Causation as Influence”" Causation and Counterfactuals 2004b Cambridge (MA) MIT Press 75 106
19. Mackie J. L."“Causes and Conditions”" American Philosophical Quarterly 1965Vol 12 245 265
20. Menzies P. Collins J. , et al"“Difference-making in Context”" Causation and Counterfactuals 2004 Cambridge (MA) MIT Press 139 180
21. Menzies P."“Counterfactual Theories of Causation”" Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2009
22. Reiss J."“Counterfactuals, Thought Experiments, and Singular Causal Analysis in History”" Philosophy of Science 2008Vol 76 712 723 [Crossref]
23. Suetonius J. Rolfe J. C. The lives of the twelve Caesars 1913 Harvard University Press
24. Tucker A."“Historiographical Counterfactuals and Historical Contingency”" History and Theory 1999Vol 38 264 276 [Crossref]
25. Tucker A. Our Knowledge of the Past: A Philosophy of Historiography 2004 Cambridge (UK) University Press [Crossref]
26. Tucker A."“Causation in History”" A Companionship to the Philosophy of History and Historiography 2011 Chichester Wiley-Blackwell 98 108
27. van Inwagen P."Ability and Responsibility. The Philosophical Review" 1978Vol 87 201 224
28. Weber M. Weber M., Shils E., Finch H."‘Objective Possibility and Adequate Causation in Historical Explanation’" The Methodology of the Social Sciences 1949 Glencoe Free Press 164 188

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Journal of the Philosophy of History — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation